Laying the Groundwork for OS Systems Management

Datamation content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More .

The systems management space has been dominated by proprietary vendors like
IBM Tivoli and HP OpenView for years, though in recent years open source
upstarts are trying to make a dent. Among those upstarts are GroundWork and
Hyperic, both of whom are out this week with new product releases.

For GroundWork, the new release is GroundWork Monitor 5.2 as well as a new
Enterprise Edition that can scale to up to 10,000 servers. The Enterprise
Edition complements GroundWork’s existing Professional and Community
Editions.

GroundWork Monitor first took
the stage nearly two years ago as an integrated suite of open source
systems management tools, including the popular Nagios network monitoring
tool.

With the 5.2 release, GroundWork is adding new auto configuration and
discovery functionality as well as improved reporting features.

According to David Dennis, senior director of product marketing at
GroundWork the key competitor is HP’s OpenView. Dennis noted that they
rarely run into other vendors in competitive situations except for IBM
Tivoli. “The lion’s share of market is HP OpenView and that is where we feel we
offer the biggest benefit for the customer,” Dennis said.

On the other end of the spectrum is open source systems management vendor
Hyperic who is also out with a new release this week. Hyperic HQ 3.2
includes a new plug-in architecture which is intended to make the entire
platform more extensible.

“Largely this is a wrapper or extension of our APIs that is more
accessible/friendly to our users,” Paul Melmon, senior vice president of engineering at
Hyperic told InternetNews.com. “However, due to its modular design
and ease of use, it has changed our engineering development patterns. We can
develop faster, and provide additional components of functionality
independent of the core HQ management platform.”

For Melmon, the principal competition isn’t necessarily HP OpenView or IBM
Tivoli. Rather, it’s the build-versus-buy issue. Melmon argued that most of
Hyperic’s users have built their own Web-based applications using a broad
array of components, open source or otherwise. The mentality is since it’s
so custom, it needs a custom management approach as well.

“So, they turn to their own scripts or a hybrid of other open source basics
like Nagios,” Melmon said. “As they scale and change becomes more frequent,
these homegrown tools become brittle and require a lot of maintenance. This
is when they find Hyperic and realize that we can help them lower their cost
of service by providing a tailored, flexible and scalable monitoring and
management solution.”

This article was first published on InternetNews.com. To read the full article, click here.