Datamation content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.
A record number of instant messaging worm mutations is undermining
network security, according to new analysis.
Security and IT administrators have been aware of IM worms and viruses
for some time now. How seriously they have been taking that threat just
might be another issue, according to some analysts.
And some say it’s time to pick up the vigilance.
”Administrators probably need to ratchet up their concern,” says
Patrick Hinojosa, CTO of Panda Software U.S., an anti-virus company. ”I
see some concern out there, but I don’t see probably as much attention on
it as there should be… It’s punching a hole through the front-end
defenses and then it goes directly back to the network.”
The IMLogic Threat Center, an arm of IMlogic Inc., an instant messaging
management and security company, reports that 88 percent of IM worms
tracked have mutated at least once in the last 11 months. They also
report that there have been a record number of IM threat mutations —
meaning the malware attacking instant messaging software is increasingly
producing variants.
Art Gilliland, vice president of products at IMLogic, says there are a
few IM worms that have produced more than 100 variants over the last 10
or 11 months. Kelvir is one of them, mutating 123 times this year.
In addition, traditional email worms have begun spreading through IM. For
example the email Rbot worm, which has produced more than 600 variants
since first being discovered in email, now has more than 13 mutations
using IM for distribution.
Gilliland says between October 2004 and the same month in 2005, IM
malware grew by 1,500 percent. And comparing all of 2004 to January
through mid-November of 2005, IM malware has jumped 2,200 percent. That
adds up to 2,002 unique viruses that have been identified so far this
year, compared to 134 that were identified last year.
Gilliland adds that IM viruses pose a unique threat because of how
quickly they can spread over this particular communication software.
Email sees slower distribution. An IM malware, according to Gilliland,
could spread as quickly as to 2,000 or 3,000 machines in 15 minutes.
”We’ve seen quite a bit of activity on the mutli-variant front with IM
worms, without a doubt,” says Ken Dunham, a senior engineer for VeriSign
iDefense Intelligence based in Mountain View, Calif. ”Hackers recognize
that it’s trivial to create multiple variants. It’s easy pickin’s for
people to pick off the low-hanging fruit in the IM environment. Low
hanging fruit is the consumer on their home computer… and companies
allowing for non-compliant installation of software. They’re definitely
more at risk. If you allow people to do what they want on their computer,
then you’re at a much higher risk than admin who lock down the desktop.”
But Dunham points out that millions more people use email compared to
those using instant messaging. And since people also use a variety of IM
software — AIM, Yahoo, MSN — that also makes it harder for a hacker to
target a wide swath of IM users.
But Panda’s Hinojosa says as IM usage increases, so will the threats.
”As IM usage increases, it will continue to be more dangerous,
especially on the corporate side because it’s largely an uncontrolled
means of communication,” he says.
