Data Storage vs. the Laws of Physics

Data storage hardware has improved, yet still strains at the limits. Data storage expert Henry Newman looks at the underlying science and discusses trends in storage capacity over a multi-year timespan. This is an update of one of my first articles for Enterprise Storage Forum from way back in 2002. The article was well received, […]

Written By
Henry Newman
Henry Newman
Published: Nov 4, 2010
Updated: Jan 28, 2021
3 minute read
Datamation content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Data storage hardware has improved, yet still strains at the limits. Data storage expert Henry Newman looks at the underlying science and discusses trends in storage capacity over a multi-year timespan.


This is an update of one of my first articles for Enterprise Storage Forum from way back in 2002. The article was well received, so I figured it was time to see what has changed – if anything – in our industry over the last 8 years. What I found is that things have only gotten worse when it comes to managing storage. Simple physics defines the limitations under which you have to work. The movement of data from applications to hardware devices is limited by physical constraints within the computer and its storage hardware.

First, let’s compare the fastest computers and the fastest storage disk storage devices from 1976, 2002, and today, to get a better understanding of the changes we’ve seen over the last 26 years.

YearCPU Performance *Disk Drive TypeDisk Drive SizeDisk Seek Plus LatencyTransfer Rate
1976CDC 7600 25 MFLOPs **Cyber 81980 MB24 ms3MBps half duplex
2002NEC Earth Simulator 40 TFLOPS ***Seagate Cheetah 10.6K RPM146GB7.94 ms ****200 MB/sec full Duplex******
2010Oak Ridge Lab Jaguar 1.75 PFLOPs ******Many vendors2TB 3.5 inch 10.7K RPM SATA; 146 GB 2.5-inch 15K RPM SAS; 600GB 2.5 inch 10K RPM SAS~13.6 ms write; ~5.3 ms write; ~7.5 ms write (Flash SSD average access time is 20 to 120 microseconds)800 MBps full Duplex********

* Though this might not be the best measure of throughput it is a good comparison ** Million Floating Point Operations Per Second *** Trillion Floating Point Operations Per Second **** Average seek and latency for read and write ***** Using FC RAID with 2 Gb interfaces and RAID-5 8+1 in ******According towww.top500.org6/2010 (A new machine from China is expected to be faster and will be announced in mid-November) ******* Using RAID-5/6 8+1 or 8+2

Read the rest at Enterprise Storage Forum.

Advertisement

  SEE ALL
ARTICLES
 

Henry Newman

Henry Newman is a ServerWatch contributor.

Datamation Logo

Datamation is the leading industry resource for B2B data professionals and technology buyers. Datamation's focus is on providing insight into the latest trends and innovation in AI, data security, big data, and more, along with in-depth product recommendations and comparisons. More than 1.7M users gain insight and guidance from Datamation every year.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.