While Internet telephony has become a hot topic in Washington over the last two months, the FBI has had the technology in its sights for more than a year. It doesn’t like what it sees, or more to the point, what it can’t hear.
The agency’s electronic surveillance experts worry that Voice over Internet Protocol
With regular phone calls, voice packet travels from one fixed point to another, making intercepting traffic fairly routine. VoIP calls, on the other hand, can travel several routes and even change direction as the network seeks the clearest path.
“The geo-location problem can’t be taken for granted,” Lee Tien, a senior attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a digital rights organization, told internetnews.com.
The FBI’s problem extends beyond the technology to the language of the law itself. In 1994, Congress passed the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) requiring phone companies to make their networks, at their own expense, uniformly accessible to wiretaps.
CALEA created a vast electronic surveillance infrastructure allowing agencies, with a court order, to quickly, easily and inexpensively tap phone conversations. The law, however, never anticipated VoIP.
Because of this, there are conflicting elements, a high-ranking FCC official said. On one hand, CALEA exempts information services (such as ISPs), but on the other, it includes services that are substantially the same as phone service.
The FCC is expected to issue its first proposed rules next week to determine what, if any, telecom rules should apply to VoIP.
If the FCC determines Internet-based telephony is an information service not a telecommunications carrier, the emerging technology would be free of many of myriad rules and regulations, including wiretap requirements, governing traditional telephone companies.
While VoIP technology clearly provides phone service, it does it by turning voice packets into data packets and does so over the virtually unregulated Internet instead of the heavily regulated public switched voice telephone networks (PSTN).
The VoIP industry claims it is not a telecom carrier since it does not deal in voice traffic and should not be subject to the usual taxes and regulations, including CALEA.
VoIP providers must walk a fine PR line . . . see page 2
The public relations problem for VoIP providers is to not appear unpatriotic or unwilling to comply with the spirit of the law while at the same time trying to block costly, regulatory intrusions into the nascent industry.
The providers have publicly stated they will cooperate with law enforcement on any wiretap request.
“I encourage you [the FCC] to give these voluntary approaches time to work. What you shouldn’t do is just dump legacy regulation on what is a fundamentally different technology,” Jeff Pulver, founder of VoIP service Free World Dialup, told the FCC in December.
More than a year ago, Pulver asked the FCC to rule that Free World Dialup does not meet the definitional requirements of a telecom carrier.
The FCC is expected to consider Pulver’s petition Thursday. According to a news report, the FCC put the matter on its agenda only after the FBI agreed to drop its wiretap concerns about Free World Dialup in return for the agency agreeing to make future wiretap decisions about VoIP retroactive.
For his part, Pulver said “cooperation is already underway” to create wiretap practices and standards, while another pioneer VoIP provider, Jeffrey Citron, CEO of Vonage, said there is ‘no immediate technical obstacle’ to providing wiretap cooperation for law enforcement officials.
Citron added, however, “The vast majority of voice-enabled Internet communications will forever remain outside the scope of CALEA.”
The FBI says that’s not good enough.
In a joint FBI-Department of Justice (DOJ) filing with the FCC last year, the agencies wrote they “are concerned that if certain broadband telecommunications carriers fail to comply with CALEA due to a misunderstanding of their regulatory status, criminals may exploit the opportunity to evade lawful electronic surveillance.”
Just last month, the DOJ wrote in another filing, “CALEA is vital to national security, law enforcement and public safety. Such a critically important statute should not be left to mere voluntary efforts. Furthermore, under a voluntary CALEA compliance scheme, law enforcement would have no enforcement mechanism against those VoIP providers who do not cooperate.”
Tien, the EFF attorney, said “it is unclear legally if [VoIP] is subject to CALEA. The scope of CALEA was limited to switched networks. It’s really a regulatory issue. Do you classify it as a carrier or as a service provider?”
The answer is worth millions to both the FBI and VoIP providers.
“CALEA is very costly to implement. It costs millions to go out to every switch in the country and modify it,” Tien said.
If the FCC rules VoIP is a carrier, many providers will have to retrofit their systems. If VoIP is ruled a communications service, the FBI will be forced to use costly surveillance methods such as its Carnivore packet sniffer to perform Internet snooping.
For the FBI, even with Carnivore, Internet surveillance is problematic without a wiretap friendly environment.
“Unless carriers are required to ensure such access, law enforcement surveillance capabilities will suffer a serious and dangerous gap,” the DOJ wrote in its FCC filing last year.
The FCC has clearly signaled it hopes to impose a light regulatory touch on VoIP, but issues such as CALEA shows the task may be more difficult than originally anticipated.
Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
December 04, 2020
Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 18, 2020
Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
November 10, 2020
FEATURE | By Samuel Greengard,
November 05, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 02, 2020
How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 29, 2020
Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 23, 2020
The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
October 16, 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
October 07, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
October 05, 2020
CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
September 25, 2020
Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 25, 2020
Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
September 22, 2020
NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
September 18, 2020
Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 14, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 13, 2020
IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 11, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality
FEATURE | By James Maguire,
September 09, 2020
Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 05, 2020
The Critical Nature Of IBM’s NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
August 14, 2020
Datamation is the leading industry resource for B2B data professionals and technology buyers. Datamation's focus is on providing insight into the latest trends and innovation in AI, data security, big data, and more, along with in-depth product recommendations and comparisons. More than 1.7M users gain insight and guidance from Datamation every year.
Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on Datamation and our other data and technology-focused platforms.
Advertise with Us
Property of TechnologyAdvice.
© 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this
site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives
compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products
appear on this site including, for example, the order in which
they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies
or all types of products available in the marketplace.