Wednesday, April 14, 2021

Web 2.0: ‘Generally Worthless’

Reporter’s Notebook PALO ALTO — Talk about walking into the lion’s den.

Controversial author
Andrew Keen participated in a panel discussion before a roomful of
Web entrepreneurs, executives and online media types in the wrap-up session of the AlwaysOn conference here. If that wasn’t enough,
a giant screen onstage projected bloggers’ snide comments on the proceedings
in real time. Keen, author of The Cult of The Amateur: How Today’s
Internet is Killing Our Culture
, stuck to his guns in a spirited debate
with the equally iconoclastic tech analyst George Gilder.

Keen didn’t waste any time declaring most so-called Web 2.0 (define) content to be extremely poor and hard to monetize. “The vast
majority of Web video is un-watchable, the content unreadable and generally
worthless,” said Keen.

But Gilder had his own point to make: “The vast majority of culture is
worthless; what’s new about that?” he asked, noting that there’s still
plenty of quality content to be found on the Web. While he praised Keen’s
book as having “a lot of truth” and worth reading, he said it’s “a barren
and limited vision of what the Net has to offer.”

Cult of the Amateur

The cult of Web 2.0.


Source: ajkeen.com

In his own damning-with-faint-praise concession, Keen said he didn’t mean
to say there wasn’t anything on the Web worth viewing or reading.

“I’m not
saying all the content is bad, or that every single one of the 70 million
bloggers are bad. There are bound to be a few literate ones.” Of course he
also dismissed the rest as “user-generated amateurism.”

Keen’s larger point, which I think merits consideration, is not the rise
of user-generated content per se, but the possibility it will overwhelm the
kind of managed, edited, fact-checked and, dare I say, more reliable content that more traditional publishers provide.

“The really scary thing is when all that’s left is this
self-broadcasting culture,” said Keen. “No one knows who they are, and no
one knows who to believe. For kids coming online now, they aren’t
sophisticated or have the skepticism that’s required. This profoundly
affects our civic identity and culture.”

Ironically, the need for managed content was never more evident than on the panel itself.

The otherwise lively debate veered off course several times when an HP executive took the mic. Barbara Waugh, the company’s director of university relations, seemed extremely well-prepared. Only for a different panel. At a different conference.

On four different occasions she weighed in on the need for access to technology for children in Africa, a topic whiplash that, judging by their quizzical looks, utterly confounded the other panel members and the audience.

Still another panelist, marketing consultant Bill Cleary had some good, on point, comments. He noted the positive impact bloggers have had, such as exposing flaws in the recent case of the Duke Lacrosse players who were eventually cleared of rape charges.

Keen
conceded the mainstream media did a “disgraceful job” of covering the Duke
case. “The Internet is forcing mainstream media to be more honest,” he said.
“I’m all in favor of that.”

In a follow-up interview with internetnews.com, Keen said his book
is not meant as a balanced or objective view, but was written as a polemic
that’s intentionally provocative. “I expect there will be better books on
the topic now that I’ve got things started.”

Keen said he’s tentatively scheduled to appear on Comedy Central’s
Colbert Report, which should make for some interesting chatter if it
happens. If so, I predict Colbert will tweak Keen by over-the-top enthusiasm
for his book: “You’re RIGHT! This Internet thing must be stopped.”

For now, Keen is headed for a vacation at a family camp without wireless
or Internet access, which suits him fine. He said his book is an argument
against the “cult” of Web 2.0.

“Being online is not real; Second Life is not
real life. Real community is physical when you’re with people in the same
room.” He said if he could change one thing about the Web it would be the
anonymity of posters.

“We can’t expect the Internet to police itself. In America we should
require [when someone] joins a community they reveal who they are.
Conversations will become more civil.”

You can read more of Keen’s thoughts at, where else? His blog.

This article was first published on InternetNews.com.

Similar articles

Latest Articles

NVIDIA’s New Grace ARM/GPU...

This week is NVIDIA’s GTC, or GPU Technology Conference, and they likely should have changed the name to ATC because this year – it...

What is Data Segmentation?

Definition of Data Segmentation Data segmentation is the process of grouping your data into at least two subsets, although more separations may be necessary on...

The Conversational AI Revolution:...

One of the things I’m looking forward to seeing at next week’s NVIDIA GTC event is an update on their Conversational AI efforts. I’m fascinated...

Edge Computing

Edge computing is a broad term that refers to a highly distributed computing framework that moves compute and storage resources closer to the exact...