And then along comes YouTube, the agent of our destruction. And FaceBook. And BoingBoing. And Slashdot. And Digg. And Fark, the Drudge Report, Neatorama, Apple's Movie Trailers page, eBay, Flickr -- (I get paid by the word, so I'll just keep going) -- Break.com, Wikipedia, Craigslist, Amazon.com. Google, for crying out loud. (This is a reputable web site, so I won't mention porn, online poker and extreme-video sites.)
Whenever we've got something boring, unappealing or difficult to do, we know that passive, easy, fun, interesting and compelling content is just a click away.
The Internet is an incredible productivity tool that offers unprecedented access to information and communication with others. But it's also distracting. Really distracting. More alarmingly, it's getting increasingly distracting every day.
He also points out that distraction and work look and sometimes even feel the same. You've been at your computer for six hours straight. How much of that was productive work, and how much amusement? It's hard to say, accurately. If Internet-based distractions threaten our ability to get our work done and succeed in our careers, if they seek us out, and if they evolve like viruses to become more compelling and addictive, what does that mean?
Heres what it means:
1. We're not "preparing kids for the future." There is a strong push worldwide to prepare kids for the future by installing Internet-connected PCs in schools. Part of this effort is to bridge the digital divide between rich and poor. But maybe growing up without video games and a PC in your room is an advantage. Maybe the have nots will be better equipped than the haves to face the distraction super-virus of the future because they wont become addicted as children to the Internet-distraction impulse.
I have an Indian friend - an overachieving genius type - who graduated at the top of his class at IIT (Indian Institutes of Technology) and for the last decade has been launching startups in Silicon Valley. He now has two young kids of his own, who he hopes will follow in his footsteps. When he was growing up in Bangalore in the '70s and '80s, he had no Internet distractions and nothing all that compelling on TV or on the radio. Teens didnt have their own cars, or shopping malls to hang out at. All his cultural influences were teachers, parents and grandparents (some of whom with Ph.Ds), and fellow private-school, over-achieving classmates. The most entertaining thing in his life was math homework.
His kids will grow up in another world, one with Xbox 3,060 (complete with virtual reality helmet), 5,000 channels on TV, friends video-texting their holographic cell phones in the middle of the night and inconceivably addictive distractions online. What will it take for his kids to succeed the way he did? Will they even want to? And who had the better preparation for the future?
2. Training needs to include distraction coping mechanisms. Company training programs teach applications, and sometimes even productivity. But maybe its time to institute training programs that explicitly help people cope with online distractions.
4. We need to evolve our personal methods for coping with distraction, or the distractions win. Think of how distracting the Internet was 15 years ago - in 1993 - compared to now. (The answer: Not very.) Now try to imagine how distracting it will be 15 years from now. Each new Web 2.0 site, social network and video streaming site represents another assault on our ability to focus on productive work. How compelling, addictive and distracting will the Web 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 be? The techniques you succeed with today may not be good enough for tomorrow. We need to evolve constantly.
5. The individual, the company, the nation that is best at avoiding distractions in the future will have an enormous advantage in the competitive marketplace. Think about the obesity problem. A century ago, America had the worlds healthiest population, tallest people and best food. Fast forward to today. The quality of food has declined as the quantity has increased. Now 60 percent of Americans are overweight, and a quarter clinically obese. And low-quality food is also making us shorter. What happened?
The marketing of food - advertising, packaging, brand development - evolved like a virus. Our food-industrial complex learned to seduce us into radical over-consumption. This evolution outpaced our defenses against it. Kids are addicted to sugar, artificial flavors and junk-food brands before theyre even old enough to ride a bike. Adults compulsively consume packaged, processed foods despite daily warnings in the news about their ill effects. The junk food virus is literally killing us.
Is this where Internet distractions are taking us? Is there an intellectual or mental obesity epidemic on the horizon? Are we there already?
I dont know the answers to these questions, but Ive got a bad feeling that the evolving online distraction virus is an underappreciated threat that nobody is really dealing with.
Is there a cure? Probably not. But the first step - as with any addiction - is to recognized that weve got a problem.