Wednesday, April 14, 2021

Microsoft Sued Again After Infringement Verdict

It may seem like a déjà vu situation to Microsoft’s legal team. The software giant lost an important patent infringement lawsuit on Tuesday, but the winning parties aren’t satisfied yet.

So on Wednesday, the plaintiff — a small holding company called VirnetX from Scotts Valley, Calif. — sued Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) again, for the same infringement. However, this time VirnetX is going after Microsoft for using the infringed patents in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008, according to the plaintiff’s filing in the new case.

In the earlier case, the jury found the infringing productsto be Windows XP, Windows Vista, Live Communication Server, Office Communication Server, Windows Messenger, Live Meeting Console, and Microsoft Office Communicator.

However, Windows 7 and Server 2008 weren’t covered in the original suit because neither product yet existed when the suit was filed in 2007. Windows 7 and Server 2008 were not released until the second half of 2009.

If the jury’s verdict in the first case is upheld, Microsoft will be on the hook for $105.75 million. If a new jury finds similarly in the new case, the losses could add up quickly.

Microsoft plans to request that the judge toss out the jury’s verdict and the damages award in that case, and will argue that VirnetX’s two patents are invalid.

In the new case, Microsoft is taking a similar tack.

“While we can’t comment specifically about the new complaint because we have not been served, Microsoft respects intellectual property, and we believe our products do not infringe the patents involved,” Kevin Kutz, Microsoft’s director of public affairs, said in a statement e-mailed to InternetNews.com.

“We believe those patents are invalid [and] we will challenge VirnetX’s claims,” Kutz added.

Law firm has a track record versus Microsoft

The new case was filed in the same court as the original suit — U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.

The plaintiffs’ law firm — McKool Smith of Dallas — is also the same legal team that successfully sued Microsoft last year for infringing patents belonging to a small Toronto-based company, i4i.

Microsoft unsuccessfully appealed that verdict and award last year and is currently waiting to see if the appeals court will agree to rehear its appeal “en banc,” meaning by the entire appeals court at once.

Microsoft has not yet said whether, if the appeals court does not overturn the verdict in the i4i case, it will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Stuart J. Johnston is a contributing writer at InternetNews.com, the news service of Internet.com, the network for technology professionals.

Similar articles

Latest Articles

The Conversational AI Revolution:...

One of the things I’m looking forward to seeing at next week’s NVIDIA GTC event is an update on their Conversational AI efforts. I’m fascinated...

Edge Computing

Edge computing is a broad term that refers to a highly distributed computing framework that moves compute and storage resources closer to the exact...

Data-Driven Decision Making: Top...

The phrase data-driven decision making – certainly popular in the field of data analytics – may seem redundant. After all, nearly everything is driven...

Top Performing Artificial Intelligence...

As artificial intelligence has become a growing force in business, today’s top AI companies are leaders in this emerging technology. Often leveraging cloud computing and...