META: Microsoft to Offer Server Apps on Linux?

Linux operating system server shipments are forecast to be on a high growth
track, which is likely to convince Microsoft to begin
moving some of its proprietary application enablers to the Linux
environment by 2004, according to research firm META Group.

Microsoft has not made a definitive answer one way or the other. “Microsoft will not be engineering server software expressly for Linux, and continues to make its strategic bets on the Windows platform,” a Microsoft spokesperson told internetnews.com Tuesday afternoon.

Meanwhile, META’s
predictions indicate that Linux on the server is currently more of a threat
to UNIX than to Windows. The rising tide of Linux shipments (the OS
currently commands between 15 percent and 20 percent of shipments, and is
expected to be on 45 percent of new servers by 2006/2007, according to
META) is likely to make the OS an attractive market for Microsoft.

META predicted that by late 2004, Microsoft will begin moving application
enablers like .NET components to the Linux environment, and will follow-up
gradually with major back-office products like SQL Server, IIS and
Exchange.

“We also believe Microsoft will reprice and/or separate the Windows server
OS (e.g., into kernel and “add-on” components), so it can be favorably
compared against “free” Linux,” META said Monday. “As a result of Linux’s
growing market share, and the support of IBM, Oracle, HP, Dell, et al., we
believe systems management, networking, application development, and
applications in general will increasingly be available on Linux platforms
during the next 12-18 months.”

META said Linux is more likely to cannibalize UNIX sales rather than
Windows sales, at least at first, because the total cost of ownership of
Linux servers remains higher than that of Windows servers.

“The Linux OS itself is nominally free, but data center-ready Linux
distributions (e.g., RedHat, SuSE) are not,” according to META analyst
Brian Richardson, who focuses on Server Infrastructure Strategies. “Our
research indicates that the most significant cost differences are between
RISC and Intel server hardware, and between DBMSs (Oracle on Linux vs. SQL
Server on Windows). Other “Lintel” versus “Wintel” costs are about the same
(e.g., storage, servers, middleware, applications, support), but Linux
“shadow” IT costs will likely be higher. Until 2004, we believe Linux will
be a larger threat to UNIX (particularly Solaris) than to Windows.”

Unsurprisingly, Microsoft agreed with that assessment. “Windows provides greater business value and lower long-term costs for customers than competing platforms, including Linux,” the spokesperson said.

In fact, while Linux is expected to increase its penetration in the
enterprise data center — from 3 percent currently to 11 percent in 2007 —
Windows will also be moving in, reaching 38 percent by 2007, as compared to
Unix, with 40 percent and zOS with 11 percent.

“Our analysis indicates that, by 2012, driven by Intel platform economics,
Linux will grow to a 26 percent presence (Windows will move to 51 percent;
UNIX and zOS will contract to 20 percent and 3 percent, respectively), said
Rich Evans, Enterprise Data Center Strategies, META Group.

Indeed, Evans predicted that of all the players, Intel will be the true
winner.

“Reflecting the market’s continued drive for cost-effective hardware,
2007-2012 platform demographics will reflect Intel’s expanded dominance
(from 54 percent to 82 percent) at the expense of both RISC (falling from
35 percent to 15 percent) and CISC (IBM’s complex instruction set
computers — falling from 11 percent to 3 percent),” he said.

RELATED NEWS AND ANALYSIS

• Ethics and Artificial Intelligence: Driving Greater Equality

  FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
  December 16, 2020

• AI vs. Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  December 11, 2020

• Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  December 04, 2020

• Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 18, 2020

• Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  November 10, 2020

• Top 10 AIOps Companies

  FEATURE |  By Samuel Greengard,
  November 05, 2020

• What is Text Analysis?

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 02, 2020

• How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 29, 2020

• Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 23, 2020

• The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 16, 2020

• Top 10 Chatbot Platforms

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  October 07, 2020

• Finding a Career Path in AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  October 05, 2020

• CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  September 25, 2020

• Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 25, 2020

• Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2021

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  September 22, 2020

• NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 18, 2020

• Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 14, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 13, 2020

• IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 11, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality

  FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
  September 09, 2020