Waste Management Inc. has no intention of letting its name be dragged through the dirt by its new ERP system. The $12 billion, Houston-based firm — the largest solid-waste management company in the U.S.–recently began a $100-plus million installation of financial and human resources software from PeopleSoft Inc. of Pleasanton, Calif. It is determined, says Tom Smith, Waste Management’s CIO, to make the new system succeed.
The company’s current, AS/400-based system, had been built completely with proprietary, custom code. One of the keys to making the new system succeed, Waste Management realized, was using the software — as much as possible — just as it came from PeopleSoft.
The risks of installing big-ticket software applications are certainly clear. The complexity of installing enterprise-wide systems has led to some spectacular failures in recent years. High-flying shoemaker Nike Inc. stumbled last quarter, when problems related to a complex installation of supply chain software from i2 Technologies, Inc. forced it to write off $100 million in inventory and miss its sales goals. In the last two years, both Phoenix, Ariz.-based PETsMART, Inc. and Hershey, Penn.-based candy maker Hershey Foods Corp. saw revenues suffer as a result of problems implementing ERP systems from SAP.
|At a Glance|
“The lesson learned from failures like Nike is that having to customize complex environments can kill you,” says Joshua Greenbaum, principle of Enterprise Applications Group, in Daly City, Calif.
That’s a lesson that Waste Management is paying careful attention to. After a pilot last December, the company is now rolling out the PeopleSoft software to about 250 of its 1,500 locations each month, and expects to complete the installation by the end of 2001. In the process, it is keeping a tight reign on customizations, intentionally making it difficult for users to modify the system. “Any customizations required need to be approved at a higher level than the team working on it,” explains Smith. “We believe that we will greatly enhance our chances of success by keeping our system very plain vanilla.”
That doesn’t mean Waste Management can avoid customization altogether. The company has modified the PeopleSoft system, for example, to accommodate differences in contracts negotiated with different unions.
But custom programming will not make up a significant part of the total work involved in the project. Smith estimates the changes will make up about only about one percent of the total effort.
Deploying right out of the box
That is exactly what the ERP vendors like to hear. All of the major players encourage their customers to minimize customizations and deploy their software right out of the box whenever possible. For the vendors, simple installations mean less chance of failures that can be both embarrasing and potentially expensive; New York, NY-based clothing manufacturer Warnaco is suing SAP, for example, over a troubled R/3 installation. And it’s much easier for a vendor’s tech support engineers to provide support for standard installations than for ones that have been heavily modified.
To help nudge customers away from customizing their R/3 installations, in mid-1996 SAP introduced a rapid implementation program called AcceleratedSAP (ASAP)–now called ValueSAP–that promised faster, less expensive installations. Oracle’s similar FastForward program and PeopleSoft’s Select (now PeopleSoft Accelerated E-business Solutions) were both introduced in 1997. SAP estimates that 90% of its customers now make some use of its accelerated implementation methodology.
Initially, these rapid implementation programs were a way for the ERP vendors to expand their market to smaller companies, says Katherine Jones, managing director of Collaborative Business Applications at the Aberdeen Group in Boston, Mass. “They had cleaned out the Fortune 1000,” she says, “and they knew they couldn’t sell seven-year rollout plans to mid-market companies.”
The rapid implementation programs, Jones says, let smaller companies–those without programmers on staff to customize applications, or the budget to hire consultants to do the work–install ERP systems. “But now, the vendors are looking at the approach and saying ‘this may not be a bad idea for everyone,'” she says.
And indeed, Waste Management is not the only large company aiming to install ERP applications without extensive customization. GE Power Systems, for example, a $14 billion division of General Electric, is in the process of implementing Oracle’s manufacturing software–without making a single modification–according to Oracle CEO Ellison. That, says Ellison, should enable GE Power Systems to get the first factory up and running within five months of signing the contract.
Over time, ERP products have gained more and more functionality, which makes it easier to install them without customization. Oracle, which entered the application software market in 1987 with Oracle Financials, now sells some 75 different applications covering a broad spectrum of business requirements. SAP offers software specialized for 22 different industries, from paper mills to retail to oil and gas refining; PeopleSoft has tailored its applications for eight vertical markets, including government, education and telecommunications.
The danger with installing software without customization, of course, is that it may not do everything you need it to do. That is a tradeoff vendors, particularly Oracle, are urging their customers to make. “You are better off with an 80% solution installed and working in six months,” Oracle CEO Larry Ellison told users at Oracle’s AppsWorld conference in February, “than fantasizing about a 100% solution that you might finish in two years after you write lots and lots of custom code.”
(Tomorrow, going “vanilla” with your ERP software isn’t a one-scoop deal. Besides getting their initial installs up and running faster, companies are finding that new software upgrades with greater functionality are allowing them to replace some custom code with off-the-shelf software that their ERP vendor, not their in-house IT staff, will support.)
Dan Orzech is a Philadelphia-based writer specializing in technology. His work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, and many computer industry publications. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.