Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Things I’d Like to See Fixed in Leopard Server

Having had a chance to really test Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Server, I’m still impressed. I still think it’s the best server release Apple has ever had, especially from the SMB point of view. However, like every bit of software ever released anywhere, it’s not perfect, and there are some things I’d like to see improved, and/or fixed.

Eliminate the install silos

Apple Mac Columns

Apple Arrogance Unleashed!

Review: the iPod Touch

Leopard is Good (but it ain’t no threat to Microsoft)

Top 10 Mac Productivity Enhancements

FREE Tech Newsletters

One of the cool things Apple did with Mac OS X 10.5 Server is to make setting it up simpler for those with simple needs, i.e. the “Workgroup” setup. The problem is, the setup types are fairly siloed. For example, if you use the Workgroup setup because you want some really cool features, like importing Active Directory users for augment records, or ease of setting up iCal Server, you’re unable to get to any features outside of what you get in Server Preferences. If you attach to the server in Server Admin, and you say you want to now use it in “Advanced” mode, you can’t use Server Preferences with it. No big deal, right? Well, it is if you want to create more augmented users, because in “Advanced” mode, you have to use Workgroup Manager for user management, and Workgroup Manager can’t import Active Directory users to create augment records.

If you install simple, you can go advanced, but you can’t go back. If you install advanced, you can’t use any of the simple features. In my world “Advanced” doesn’t mean “more crippled than simple.” Sure, you can create augment records manually, but why? This is silly. Even worse, to even see augmented users, you have to enable “Show All Records” in the preferences, and then manually find the “augments” entry, to even see them. “Advanced” is not synonymous with “make it harder than it needs to be.”

Eliminate “almost” setting up services

As a few people know, I’m a big fan of SNMP, and in Mac OS X 10.5, and Mac OS X 10.5 Server, SNMP got a huge update. But still, to set it up on server, the only thing you can do with Server Admin is to turn it on. To configure it, you’re deep into snmpconf and the .conf files. Really, it’s not hard to put a decent UI on this. If Apple was smart, they could lead the way towards encouraging the use of SNMPv3, which allows for encryption and “real” authentication. NTP setup? On/off. No way to set any options. Same thing with SSH.

Make Directory a bit less restrictive

The Directory application: Great way to set up groups, resources, etc., in Mac OS X 10.5 Server. However, if you have more than 500 people/groups/etc. in your directory service, well, good luck browsing that list. Directory will not display all records if there are more than 500 entries in what you’re displaying. You can’t even manually select it.

Continued: iCal server, Groupware services…

More flexibility/ease of use for external directory users in iCal server

iCal server is a neat product, but if you have users hosted with other directory services, such as Active Directory, or eDirectory, there’s some silly pain there. For example, you have Kerberos v5 to authenticate for external directory users, but that’s not all that clear. When setting up access, even in iCal for external directory users, even though the standard default port for iCal server is 8008, if you don’t manually put that in the URL string, you can’t connect, and the error message looks more like a Kerberos message than a wrong port message. Oh, and if there’s a way to get delegation to work in iCal between Open Directory and Augment users, I’ve yet to figure it out.

Apple Mac Columns

Apple Arrogance Unleashed!

Review: the iPod Touch

Leopard is Good (but it ain’t no threat to Microsoft)

Top 10 Mac Productivity Enhancements

FREE Tech Newsletters

Need an OWA layer for groupware services

Yes, I know, Apple isn’t here to push Windows software. Except for Safari…or iTunes. But honestly, the state of CalDAV clients on Windows sucks. Point blank. There are some plugins for Outlook in work, but that’s an annoying solution to manage and support if you have a lot of Windows boxes. A better idea that would make using Mac OS X 10.5 Server easier in heterogenous shops would be an Outlook Web Access, or OWA layer for Mac OS X 10.5 Server’s groupware. That way, you would just point Outlook 2003 or later, or Entourage at a single URL, and as far as their concerned, it’s just an odd version of Exchange. No software to install or manage, no plugin interactions to support. It’s a “Win” for everyone (pun fully intended).

Still too hard to visualize and create Open Directory structures

One of the biggest complaints with Apple’s tools is that actual directory management with them is really tedious compared to other directory services. For example, with Active Directory, I can easily view all my containers (CNs), and organizational units (OUs), as a single tree. If I want to create a containter or OU, it’s a single right click operation. If I want to move users in and out of structures, dead simple. With Apple’s tools, you can’t really view your overall directory structure at all. Creating OUs is especially tedious, but even creating CNs isn’t as easy as it should be. Moving items around the directory is counterintuitive for the native structures Apple users, and for custom OUs or CNs, it’s even worse. This is something that’s a serious problem for Open Directory, especially in situations where it has to go up against better implementations like Active Directory and eDirectory.

Overall, Mac OS X 10.5 Server is a big improvement, but it’s not completely done yet.

Similar articles

Latest Articles

Data Belongs in the...

In 2012, IBM made an oft-quoted claim that 90 percent of the world's data has been created in the last two years. They grossly...

Google Cloud Rolling Out...

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Google Cloud is helping the government sector with zero trust. The set of services are designed to help U.S. federal, state, and...

CFOs Committing to Digital...

STAMFORD, Conn. — More CFOs are planning to increase their spending on digital than any other part of the business in 2021. Eighty-two percent of...

SAP and IBM Partnering...

WALLDORF, Germany and ARMONK, N.Y. — SAP and IBM are working together to help financial institutions accelerate cloud adoptions and “modernize operations.” SAP plans to...