Though it didn’t win any licenses in the Federal Communications Commission’s recent multi-billion-dollar spectrum auction, Google said it is pleased with the results — and vows to continue pressing for greater network openness.
The comments come as the first from the online giant following the end of a federally mandated quiet period that now leaves participants in the FCC’s 700MHz spectrum auction free to dish on the their bidding strategies and future plans.
For Google, (NASDAQ: GOOG) those plans involve working with regulators as the FCC decides how to address issues lingering in the wake of the largest spectrum sell-off in history.
“The end of the auction certainly doesn’t mark the end of our efforts toward greater wireless choice and innovation,” Richard Whitt, Google’s Washington telecom and media counsel, and Joseph Farber, Google’s corporate counsel, wrote yesterday in a company blog post.
While Verizon Wireless walked away the winning bidder in the spectrum’s premium C Block, Google’s participation proved instrumental. The company’s bidding helped to trigger rules requiring the block’s winner to open the network they create to all types of devices and applications.
Fiercely resisted by Verizon, the FCC’s open-access requirements were a key victory for Google, which is working to build support for its Android mobile application platform through the Open Handset Alliance.
While Google remained tight-lipped on its intentions heading into the auction, many observers believed the company’s motivations were less about spending billions on licenses to build a nationwide wireless network, and more about forcing open access.
Whitt and Farber this week confirmed those suspicions.
“Google’s top priority heading into the auction was to make sure that bidding on the so-called ‘C Block’ reached the $4.6 billion reserve price that would trigger the important ‘open applications’ and ‘open handsets’ license conditions,” they wrote.
To ensure C Block bidding hit the necessarily price, Google raised its bid in 10 rounds of the auction even when it was faced no opposing bidders, Whit and Farber wrote.
They added that Google had been prepared to shell out for the licenses in the event that no one topped its bids.