Would Do-Not-Spam List Benefit the Enterprise?

The increased energy behind the consumer push to stop spam through federal legislation and

the equivalent of a do-not-call list could help businesses, which have been fighting the

spam battle for years, according to industry analysts.

A study released this week shows what no one is surprised about: People hate spam. What some

analysts say is more surprising is that 79 percent of consumers want spam banned or limited

by law, according to a report from the ePrivacy Group and the Poneman Institute. And 74

percent want a federal do-not-spam list, much like the do-not-call list that recently went

up, limiting telemarketing. Another 59 percent of consumers want spammers to be punished.

”The emailing public has been at the mercy of spammers for way too long,” says Senator

Charles E. Schumer (D, N.Y.), who is pushing for a do-not-spam registery. ”My bill fights

spam on two fronts: It gives email users the ability to put their names on a list to stop

getting spammed and gives law enforcement the ability to go after those spammers who send

this junk.”

The do-not-spam list would go beyond the individual consumer, and be an added weapon in the

enterprise fight against spam, says Vincent Schiavone, president of the ePrivacy Group,

which is based in Philadelphia.

”A lot of bulk mail is aimed at corporate networks,” notes Schiavone. ”A company could

put it’s domain name on the list. For the first time IBM.com could say no unsolicited

marketing material. Any list should enable domain-wide opting out. For the enterprise, this

should take care of a lot of spam.”

But not everyone is convinced that a do-not-spam list would actually work.

Schiavone explains that the list would affect legitimate U.S. companies that are in the

‘grey area’ of spamming. They’re real companies doing real business. But maybe they haven’t

updated their databases or they’re not working with a strong opt-in and opt-out policy.

Those companies would be the ones most likely to be pulled into line by a federal law or an

enforceable do-not-spam list.

But that accounts for only a portion of spam.

What about all of those get rich quick, grow more hair, have better sex and pornographic

emails? What about all the spam that comes from other fraudulent organizations from other

countries?

What would this list mean to them? Not much.

Haff says federal legislation is apt to be more effective.

”If a legitimate company sends out an email that wasn’t requested, this law would affect

them,” says Haff. ”Hopefully, it would make them reconsider their actions before the email

goes out. But any law would have to be carefully crafted so it’s not so stringent that

legitimate companies are fighting it rather than welcoming it. Ford Motor Co. or United

Airlines are not the problem when it comes to spam. We should be able to agree on that.”

ePrivacy’s Schiavone says solving the spam puzzle will take a combination of technology, federal legislation and industry policy.

”A combination of tools and laws is the only way to get a handle on it,” says Schiavone, who promotes the idea of digital signatures on emails and other sender verifications. ”There is no trust or accountability in email… Corporate America is under more pressure from spam than the general public is. The cost of not solving the problem is huge.”

RELATED NEWS AND ANALYSIS

• Ethics and Artificial Intelligence: Driving Greater Equality

  FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
  December 16, 2020

• AI vs. Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  December 11, 2020

• Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  December 04, 2020

• Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 18, 2020

• Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  November 10, 2020

• Top 10 AIOps Companies

  FEATURE |  By Samuel Greengard,
  November 05, 2020

• What is Text Analysis?

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 02, 2020

• How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 29, 2020

• Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 23, 2020

• The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 16, 2020

• Top 10 Chatbot Platforms

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  October 07, 2020

• Finding a Career Path in AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  October 05, 2020

• CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  September 25, 2020

• Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 25, 2020

• Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2021

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  September 22, 2020

• NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 18, 2020

• Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 14, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 13, 2020

• IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 11, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality

  FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
  September 09, 2020