The events of the past few months have brought disasters back to the 
front of corporate agendas.
Unfortunately, not all organizations realize the critical need to 
internalize planning and may figure they will let the government help 
them if the time comes. What they don’t realize is that even if a 
disaster strikes, there may not be aid. They must take care to preserve 
their own business continuity.
Organizations simply must take control of their own recovery plans.
Hurricanes like Katrina and Rita are vivid in peoples’ minds right now as 
is the outcry for assistance from the government and private 
organizations. However, assistance isn’t always forthcoming.
In September, Wisconsin was struck by 27 tornados that damaged 400 homes. 
Their request to be declared a federal disaster area to get government 
assistance was denied. Accusations are being leveled that the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is spread too thin and can not help 
Wisconsin, though they would have in times past.
Can you gamble on getting assistance?
Despite living in a city that was below sea level, many in New Orleans 
did not have flood insurance, yet were covered for hurricanes — or so 
they thought. Heated debate and lawsuits are arising from carriers 
declining claims based on arguements that the property damage was not 
caused by the hurricane directly, which would be covered. Some claim the 
storm surge and subsequent flooding is what caused the damage and that 
would not be covered by insurance policies.
The issue is that flooding requires a separate rider that many did not 
buy. If those families and businesses do not get reimbursed from 
insurance, how will they fair? Have you checked your insurance policies 
lately against your most likely risks to make sure you have the 
appropriate coverage to ensure that recovery is possible?
To worsen many already dire situations, some organizations in New Orleans 
dutifully sent their backup media to offsite storage sites located around 
the city. Not only did some groups lose their on-site data, but the 
offsite data was destroyed, as well.
Given your most likely risks, do you have a backup process that 
safeguards your data from regional incidents? Do you need to guard 
against regional disasters, and if so, how far away must the backups 
travel?
The Need for Planning
With just these few examples in mind, when was the last time you and your 
team sat down and ran through the most likely scenarios that threaten 
your organization? The careful review should move beyond abstracted risks 
and focus on layered situations. Move past ”what if we lose power?” and 
instead focus on realistic matters such as ”whatif lightning takes out 
both the primary and secondary grids that feed our facility?”.
The power company’s communication structure is in disarray and an 
estimated time to recover is not even available. What must be done 
immediately? What do we do 30 minutes into the outage? What do we do an 
hour in? At what time do we begin powering down systems and in what 
order? How do we inform employees?
The idea is to use realistic situations to foster dialogue and to capture 
and formalize ideas that are scattered through the team. The end result 
must be a disaster recovery plan that covers the most likely scenarios.  
Whether there are three, five or 20 scenarios, the exact count will 
depend on the organization and the risks that confront it.
The goal is to plan to the level that management feels is adequate.
Whenever a disaster strikes, even a small one, take the time to review 
lessons learned. Determine what worked well, what did not and revise  
plans accordingly.
Business Continuity
Moving beyond disaster recovery is the idea of business continuity.
How will you keep the business running during some kind of disaster? If 
disaster recovery is concerned about restoring a given service back into 
production, business continuity planning is concerned with the holistic 
issues surrounding keeping the business running or getting back up and 
running as quickly as possible to minimize impacts.
Some organizations get hit by a disaster and disappear. We, of course, 
don’t want that to happen to us. If we return to our power example from 
above, think about what business processes are most critical to our 
ability to stay operating. What is needed to operate? If the automated 
systems are down, can they run manually?
These questions are aimed at understanding the organization’s 
requirements and then layering IT’s capabilities in to support the 
business. Organizations must review their risks and then develop options 
to mitigate continuity risks.
For details, there are many resources on the Web that have been quietly 
evolving. There is a wealth of recommended practices out there to aid in 
your planning, including recommendations in ITIL and ISO 17799.  
Furthermore, discuss matters with your team and industry association to 
get started.
There are many avenues to consider. Groups that haven’t dusted off their 
disaster recovery and business continuity plans since Y2K should get them 
out and run through them, thinking about the disasters most likely to 
strike. The scenarios should be detailed enough that responses are 
gauged, corrective actions defined and investments approved.
Organizations can’t take their responses for granted. If they do, they 
might be faced with the day when planning would have made the difference 
between being in or out of business.
Here are some additional resources:
 Continuity Central;
 Full OGC Business Continuity Planning Guide;
 FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet;
 NC State University;
 OGC Guidelines for BCP;
 Texas BCP Guidance.
- 
Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think
FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
December 04, 2020
 
- 
Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
November 18, 2020
 
- 
Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA
FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
November 10, 2020
 
- 
Top 10 AIOps Companies
FEATURE |  By Samuel Greengard,
November 05, 2020
 
- 
What is Text Analysis?
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
November 02, 2020
 
- 
How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
October 29, 2020
 
- 
Dell Technologies World:  Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
October 23, 2020
 
- 
The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media
FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
October 16, 2020
 
- 
Top 10 Chatbot Platforms
FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
October 07, 2020
 
- 
Finding a Career Path in AI
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
October 05, 2020
 
- 
CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science
FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
September 25, 2020
 
- 
Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future
FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
September 25, 2020
 
- 
Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2020
FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
September 22, 2020
 
- 
NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
September 18, 2020
 
- 
Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
September 14, 2020
 
- 
Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
September 13, 2020
 
- 
IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI
FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
September 11, 2020
 
- 
Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality
FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
September 09, 2020
 
- 
Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs
FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
September 05, 2020
 
- 
The Critical Nature Of IBM’s NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
August 14, 2020
 
 
SEE ALL
ARTICLES