As first reported by internetnews.com, several major technology companies have united under the Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF) to create a standard for making infrastructure from various vendors interoperate in utility computing environments.
The work of the group shares common characteristics with a consortium led by EDS,
Instead, DMTF President Winston Bumpus said Cisco Systems,
plans to work with the DCML group to improve the interoperability of present day data center environments.
After all, both groups share the belief that improving multi-vendor integration will reduce IT management costs, which cost-budget-strapped customers are looking to do.
“We have been actively discussing this with them,” Bumpus told internetnews.com. “I’ve been in contact with the board members of EDS, Opsware and Computer Associates.”
For now though, Bumpus said members of the Utility Computing Working Group will work to create common object models for utility computing services under the auspices of the DMTF’s Common Information Model (CIM)
Utility computing, or on-demand computing, in which companies can pay for computing resources as they need it with regard to ebbs and flows in business demand, has become one of the hottest trends in the industry for companies looking to cut costs by automating the infrastructure in their data centers.
But one of the pitfalls associated with this grand undertaking is the number of disparate products from competing vendors in the data center. While IT administrators have worked around running say, IBM software on servers from Sun with adapters and plug-ins, new interoperability tactics are required for utility computing models.
Rivals HP, IBM, Sun Microsystems and VERITAS are all spearheading their own utility computing models, with different approaches and architectures. But the fact that they are working together to crack the interoperability issue demonstrates the importance for assuaging customers’ concerns.
Bumpus said Cisco, Oracle and EMC chose to participate for their close ties to DMTF.
As for overlap with the DCML, Bumpus acknowledged he is only familiar with that endeavor at a high level. But he is not concerned with any industry fragmentation, which is the threat associated with so-called competing standards.
Jack Kudale, director brand strategy at Computer Associates, agreed that the DCML and Utility Computing Working Group can co-exist and be complementary to each other.
Kudale told internetnews.com that although both groups are in fairly nascent stages — DCML was born last October — he didn’t think overlap would be an issue and sees the new group as complementary to the DCML.
“I think their approach is a little different, and the problems they are trying to address are a little different,” Kudale said. DCML has 4 different working groups focused on complexity and provisioning, but at the end of the day both efforts are designed to give customers a more efficient way of managing their infrastructure. This is just the beginning. I’m sure they will have a set standards that will encompass both DCML’s and Utility Computing Working Group’s work.”
Bumpus agreed. “Both are so new, I’m not sure how they will align at this point,” Bumpus said. “But hopefully the best ideas will come forward and customers will support them.”
Bumpus said the Utility Computing Working Group is working with the Global Grid Forum (GGF) to see how its Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA) for grid computing
IBM’s Ellen Stokes and VERITAS’ Roger Reich are serving as interim co-chairs for the group.