Bush and Kerry Debate Technology

The IT industry is a vital driver in the U.S. economy, according to

presidential candidates Sen. John Kerry (D.-Mass) and President George

W. Bush. Both claim to focus on the importance of the high-tech world,

but some industry analysts wonder how much impact either will have on

the tech sector.

With the Nov. 2 election about a week away, the presidential hopefuls

remain neck-and-neck in the polls. Technology workers across the country

watch the candidates for an indication of which one will place more

value on the IT industry, which has been struggling to regain its

footing the past several years.

A recent survey, designed by the Computing Technology Industry

Association (CompTIA), asked the candidates camps a variety of

questions regarding the role of technology in the U.S. economy. The 12

questions range from their plans for keeping American high-tech workers

competitive in the global marketplace to spam and cyber security.

Candidates on Jobs, Spam, Security Questions

Mike Wendy, manager of media relations at CompTIA, says he hopes the

survey will act as a voting aid for the information technology sector.

He and his team want to provide the candidates a forum to speak to

technology workers about some of the issues they’re dealing with.

”These issues haven’t really been debated in the [presidential]

debates,” Wendy says.

He adds that CompTIA does not side with either camp but he rather hopes

readers will utilize the survey’s results and form their own opinions.

When responding to the survey question about the importance of the IT

industry to the growth and development of the U.S., Bush says he sees

the sector as a driving force behind the economy.

”In a rapidly changing global economy, one thing is for certain:

innovation will drive America’s economic success and prosperity,” Bush

writes in his response. ”We must adapt to the reality that the same

telecommunication networks that integrate nations into the global

economy also bring new competitors to our doorstep.”

John Bailey, deputy policy director of technology issues for the Bush

campaign, says the president plans to invest in the tech sector to

ensure its stability and competitiveness. He says the Bush

administration plans to increase funding for the Federal Research and

Development Tax Credit. He also says Bush will try to make the tax

credit affordable for the private sector.

Bailey also says Bush plans to continue to pursue free trade agreements

that open up tech markets in other nations.

”This will help tech companies expand and tap into markets overseas,

while insuring that they have the proper protections,” Bailey says.

However, Kerry’s Technology Advisor, Tom Kalil says it is clear the Bush
administration does not consider the tech industry a high priority.

”They are not focused on these issues at all,” he says. ”Only during

the heat of the campaign did they talk about it. Where were they in the

last three and a half years?”

Kalil says Kerry plans to focus heavily on the IT industry. Sen. Kerry

has said he will implement a number of plans to help the tech sector,

such as diminishing the tax credit given to IT companies for shipping

jobs overseas, and instead creating a tax credit for companies creating

new jobs here in the U.S.

Kalil also says Kerry supports the Research and Development Tax Credit

and will work with Congress to make it a permanent fixture.

Robert Atkinson, vice president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a
Washington D.C.-based research and education institute and liberal

think-tank, says the Kerry camp values the IT industry more than Bush

does.

”The president talks a good game, is long on rhetoric, but he is short

on follow-through,” Atkinson says.

Kerry surrounds himself with a lot of people focused on and

knowledgeable about information technology, Atkinson maintains. He says

it is hard to find similar people in the Bush administration.

”They are just not there,” Atkinson says. ”He [Bush] just did not

place IT at a high level.”

”I have had many personal conversations on IT with Kerry, and I get a

sense that he’s pretty interested and knowledgeable about IT,” Atkinson

adds.

Bailey disagrees. He says the Bush administration will continue to

consider the IT industry a top concern and will listen to and act on

things that people in the IT sector request.

Continue on to see how each candidate responds to issues, like cyber security, spam, and job losses.

Debating the Issues

Spam has become a major IT issue, requiring companies to devote

sometimes teams of tech workers to deal with this bandwidth-clogging

problem. It overflows inboxes, crashes email servers, and increasingly

carries a payload of damaging viruses.

Kerry’s technology advisor says spam is a tricky issue and Kerry’s
administration would allow the tech market to come up with solutions for

it.

”He would rely as much as possible on the marketplace for solutions

and creating new technologies that empower users,” says Kalil.

To help combat the growing spam problem, last year Bush signed the

CAN-Spam Act into law. For one thing, the law calls for spammers to

provide an opt-out link within the body of the message. The act also is

designed to help level civil and criminal penalties on spam offenders.

”The new law establishes important ‘rules of the road’ for civil

enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), other federal

agencies, state attorneys general, and ISPs to help curb Spam,” Bush

wrote in response to CompTIA’s question.

However, Atkinson of the Progressive Policy Institute says the CAN-Spam

Act hasn’t decreased the amount of spam hitting his inbox.

”It is a highly ineffective and compromised bill,” he says. ”No one

should be surprised to see spam continue to increase. It never even

hiccupped.”

Bailey says that while more needs to be done in the battle against spam,

the act was a good stepping stone.

”It was an important first step,” Bailey says. ”It wasn’t the last

step, and not the only step, but a necessary step.” Bailey adds that it

is too soon to tell if the act has had any effect on the amount of spam

circulating the Internet.

Shawn McCarthy, senior analyst and program manager for government IT

spending at IDC, an industry analyst firm based in Framingham, Mass.,

says the CAN-Spam act hasn’t done the job.

”It has made a slight difference, but that’s not enough,” McCarthy

says. ”Spam amounts dipped modestly, but only temporarily.”

McCarthy says he thinks it will be difficult for an administration to

halt spam without eliminating all advertising emails.

Dealing with Job Loss

Over the past three years, many American IT workers have lost their jobs

because U.S. companies moved the work to foreign shores, taking

advantage of lower pay scales in countries like India, China and the

Philippines. This offshoring trend began with call center and

entry-level programming jobs, but it’s moving up the IT ladder now with

mid-level and even some upper-level technology jobs disappearing here in

the U.S.

And with high-end, high-paying jobs on the line, offshoring has become a

political hot button. What should, and can, be done is being hotly

debated.

”Today’s jobs tend to move to where they can be done more

effectively,” says Gordon Haff, an analyst with Illuminata, a Nashua,

N.H.-based industry analyst firm. ”There is not a great deal a

government can or should do about that movement.”

Both candidates say they recognize that offshoring of U.S. tech jobs is

an inevitable aspect of the global economy, however their approaches to

dealing with the issue differ.

”This is a business trend,” Bailey says. ”We may see it taper off a

bit. No one really knows how many jobs are being moved overseas.”

Thomas Lenard, Ph.D, vice president for research at The Progress and

Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank based in Washington D.C.,

says he thinks the Bush administration is handling the outsourcing issue

well.

”They reacted well to the trend,” Lenard says. ”This is a part of

international trade that benefits us all.”

Bailey says Bush is concerned when any American worker loses his job,

regardless of the reason. He says the Bush administration is focused on

job-training services that aid the American worker in finding a new

career.

Kalil, though, says the Bush administration has created a massive amount

of job loss.

”Look at the results,” Kalil says. ”There are 800,000 lost IT jobs in

the US. Bush is the first president since Hoover that we see a net

decline in the private sector.”

Kerry will work to create 12 million new jobs if elected, Kalil says.

Many analysts think IT workers should be awarded the same benefits,

counseling and job retraining given to manufacturing workers when their

jobs began moving overseas in previous decades.

Haff says these actions are vital in easing the job displacement

process.

”Those kinds of programs can only ease the pain and relocation

somewhat,” Haff says. ”They are never going to eliminate the burden of

these shifts, but they are certainly well-worth doing.”

Kalil says that while there will always be job loss due to outsourcing,

Kerry’s administration would take steps to curb this trend and support

unemployed Americans. He says Kerry would diminish the tax breaks given

to companies for sending jobs overseas and create tax credits for new

jobs.

But Bailey notes that during his presidency, Bush has increased the

Training Assistance Adjustment budget by 150 percent. He also has upped

job-training funds by 12 percent.

Bush also plans to propose a Personal Re-employment Account that will

grant displaced workers funds toward finding a new job. If the person

lands a new job within 13 weeks, the balance goes into their pocket,

Bailey says.

Building Cyber Security

Malware, industrial spies and black hat hackers cause massive amounts of
damage to enterprise networks every year. Now foreign-based hackers are

being added to that mix. Without a viable solution neutralizing these

attacks, the candidates also voiced concerns about cyber security and

just how to handle it.

”We need a president who will devote the energy of the White House to

making our networks — our 21st century infrastructure — stronger and

more secure,” Kerry wrote in response to CompTIA’s question. ”That

means supporting a Cyber Security Intelligence System ready to detect

these threats.”

Kalil says Kerry’s Cyber Security Intelligence System refers to ways to

stomp out new kinds of worms and viruses. He says Kerry plans on

increasing funding for research and development so the IT industry can

design technologies and solutions for these dangers.

The Bush camp takes a slightly different stance.

”The investments being made today in securing our nation’s cyber

infrastructure and in cyber security R&D are working to ensure that

future generations of network software and hardware are less vulnerable

to an attack and can maintain critical operations even when

compromised,” Bush writes.

** To discuss the election and how its outcome might affect the IT industry, check out our IT Forum.

RELATED NEWS AND ANALYSIS

• Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  December 04, 2020

• Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 18, 2020

• Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  November 10, 2020

• Top 10 AIOps Companies

  FEATURE |  By Samuel Greengard,
  November 05, 2020

• What is Text Analysis?

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  November 02, 2020

• How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 29, 2020

• Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 23, 2020

• The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  October 16, 2020

• Top 10 Chatbot Platforms

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  October 07, 2020

• Finding a Career Path in AI

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Guest Author,
  October 05, 2020

• CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science

  FEATURE |  By Guest Author,
  September 25, 2020

• Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 25, 2020

• Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2020

  FEATURE |  By Cynthia Harvey,
  September 22, 2020

• NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 18, 2020

• Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 14, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By James Maguire,
  September 13, 2020

• IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 11, 2020

• Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality

  FEATURE |  By James Maguire,
  September 09, 2020

• Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs

  FEATURE |  By Rob Enderle,
  September 05, 2020

• The Critical Nature Of IBM’s NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |  By Rob Enderle,
  August 14, 2020

  SEE ALL
ARTICLES