While we're looking at Asterisk alternatives, we're going to take a tour of FreeSWITCH. Aside from the annoying capitalization, which is a contagious disease in the computer world, it's a first-class softswitch and telephony platform.
FreeSWITCH comes in two forms: a tarball containing just FreeSWITCH, and triXswitch, a bundle that includes FreeSWITCH, CentOS Linux, and WikiPBX, which is a sleek Web GUI control panel. triXswitch is the friendliest way to get acquainted with FreeSWITCH.
FreeSWITCH runs on Linux and other Unix-type operating systemsand Windows. The Windows version must be built from source code, and it comes with a nice helper application that makes it almost as easy as a binary installation. Once you get it installed, then what?
Something to keep in mind is that the VoIP space is still very young, and there is a sizable number of open-source applications and projects to choose from. The biggest opportunities and most potential for progress are in the programming space. Don't get locked in to some proprietary vendor who wants to own you and control what you can doshe who writes the code rules the world. Many open-source projects, like FreeSWITCH, are designed to welcome third-party modules and extensions. This makes it easy to customize your applications without having to start from scratch, or requiring a big team of super-elite coders. If you have super-elite coders then you can modify any part of it.
So even without having ace coders on call, FreeSWITCH can fill a lot of roles: media gateway, media server, PBX, session border controller, and wherever your ingenuity leads you. If you need a single phrase to describe it, call it "an open source communications platform."
FreeSWITCH already supports a whole lot of features, codecs, and protocols:
So Mr. Minessale had all these ideas just sitting around in his head, and ended up writing a new type of application that is more than just a PBX, but is a flexible modern communications platform.
The Asterisk 1.2 release was a bit of a watershed, because that was also when a number of other Asterisk developers left and forked Asterisk into OpenPBX, which is now called CallWeaver.
There are a number of issues with Asterisk: It's inflexible, CPU-intensive, has some core architectural limitations, and it doesn't scale up without a lot of help. Does this mean you should avoid Asterisk or Asterisk-based products? The definitive answer is "it depends." Asterisk is a popular product with a lot of support and an established company behind it, and it is the core of a lot of polished, fully featured application suites.
It is always smart to keep a little test lab going with alternatives such as CallWeaver and FreeSWITCH so you can stay current and judge their worthiness for yourself. But don't forget to also look at what's behind whatever projects you are evaluating: Is there an active developer and user community? Is it well-maintained and well-documented? Is it large enough so that it won't be derailed by the departure of one key person? The open source world is full of one-man-bands and abandoned, half-baked projects. Which is not a bad thing; the good projects bubble to the top, and the rest sink to the bottom and make a nourishing mulch. Or something poetic like that.
At any rate, I predict that FreeSWITCH is here to stay, so watch this space for some how-tos and interesting FreeSWITCH news.
This article was first published on EnterpriseVoIPPlanet.com.