The Agony and Ecstasy to eDiscovery

When a company faces litigation, understanding the complexities of eDiscovery becomes critical.
Posted September 14, 2010

Sonny Discini

Electronic discovery, or eDiscovery, can play a central role in the corporate litigation process, and is increasingly expensive as companies retain more data and employees store that data in diverse locations.

Unlike regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley, which placed many new requirements directly on organizations with a deadline for compliance, the electronic discovery amendments affect them only through the litigation process. Many companies faced with tight budgets aren't preparing in advance for litigation. This is clearly their right to do so. This bad decision can lead to astronomical costs of litigation when it finally does occur.

Penalties for failing to comply with a duty to preserve data range from monetary sanctions all the way to an "adverse inference" instruction. In this situation, a jury is instructed to assume any files and communications not produced were harmful to the defendant. Such an instruction all but guarantees defeat for a defendant.

Increasingly, judges are also holding attorneys themselves responsible for the negligent acts of their clients in preparing for discovery.

Read the rest at Enterprise IT Planet.

Tags: data storage, data storage management, compliance, Sarbanes-Oxley, eDiscovery

0 Comments (click to add your comment)
Comment and Contribute


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.