Is Enterprise Tape a 'Second Class' Citizen?

The data storage networking industry has been moving strongly toward disk tiers, but has anyone given any thought to doing the same for tape?
We have all heard for years about tiered data storage for disk arrays. Tier 1 is usually enterprise disk, which was once Fibre Channel but more and more is becoming SAS. Tier 2 is typically enterprise SATA, while tier 3 might be consumer-grade drives. And the last year or two has seen the rise of a tier 0 for flash-based solid state drives (SSDs).

There are big differences between each of the tiers in terms of reliability, performance, data integrity and cost, especially for tier 0 SSDs. Here is a quick review of some of the major differences between the disk tiers:

Drive type and interface Tier 1 FC and SAS Tier 2 SATA Tier 3 SATA
Performance Best transfer rates and best seek and latency time 2x seek and latency time; 25% less performance Seek time is the same as tier 2, but lower performance
Size 3.5 inch; moving to 2.5 3.5 inch 3.5 inch
Annualized Failure Rate Best Second best Worst
Bit Error Rate 1 sector in 10E16 bits 1 sector in 10E15 bits 1 sector in 10E14 bits
Cost Highest cost; usually about 8x per GB over tier 3 High cost; usually about 2x per GB tier 3 Lowest cost

This table does not include SSDs, of course, which have a wide range of reliability and performance and might need their own tiers.

Read the rest at Enterprise Storage Forum.

Tags: disk drives, storage networking, tape storage, enterprise storage, storage network

0 Comments (click to add your comment)
Comment and Contribute


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.