Over time one thing led to another, and the Mepis project tried an Ubuntu code base for a while, which did not work out so well. Later on, the project coordinator moved Mepis back to its Debian base as Ubuntu's proved to be problematic. Unfortunately by the time this had happened, too much time had passed without any real new clear benefit from the Mepis camp and many users appeared to have jumped ship for other distributions.
Despite the fact that today SimplyMepis is back and in full swing with a beta available of SimplyMepis 8, most people would never know this due to the incredible lack of media coverage. After all, Linux is never spoken of these days without the name Ubuntu accompanying it. With any luck, this article will work to change this.
Mepis has some great things to offer, despite its shaky history of its maintainer going for a few months without a word.
Putting the past behind us
In the past, I have been hard on the SimplyMepis project. Not due to its not keeping up, rather the fact that at the time, I felt like it had turned into abandonment-ware.
Yet today as I stare at a very promising SimplyMepis 8, I cannot help but wonder: could SimplyMepis have been the better "Ubuntu-like" distribution had things not gone south after its developer took some time off?
Considering that SimplyMepis is faster and more stable, I feel like even if the project lost its traction to Ubuntu, it may very well come back swinging. As Ubuntu (and even Kubuntu for that matter) become more bug filled, users are desperately looking for alternatives. This has driven some users to options like PCLInuxOS/Mandriva or even OpenSuSE. Unfortunately, none of these match SimplyMepis with regard to actually taking into account what users want, out of the box.
Quote: "By user request, fglrx driver 8.43.2-1 and gtk2-engines 2.12.2-1 are now in the MEPIS 7.0 pool."
Now I cannot speak for everyone, but when was the last time Ubuntu development gave a rats behind about what the users really wanted? I have a list of bug reports marked "unimportant" that will backup my ill feelings to that end. Remembering that the release schedule takes precedence over everything else in Ubuntu-land, it is no surprise that stability goes right out the window with most Ubuntu releases.
Yet even with all that Ubuntu has going against it, there are some things it does right. Unfortunately, these things are difficult to appreciate thanks to its insane release schedule that generally produces serious bugs that often go unresolved for months.
Ubuntu's success will benefit Mepis in the long run
Even though today's SimplyMepis project has opted to return to its Debian roots, the distribution still pulls some code from the Ubuntu sources. In my mind, this is wise on two fronts.
1. Take the time to see what Ubuntu does wrong with their latest release, watch for the bug reports creating the new issues. Then react accordingly.
2. The slower release schedule provides stability, while still keeping things moving forward enough to prevent the distribution from becoming stagnant.
In other words, Ubuntu becomes SimplyMepis' crash test dummy, despite the fact that most of the code is coming from Debian stable! It could over time prove to be a promising relationship even if the two distributions have no real interaction with one another.
Despite this rosy outlook, Mepis is not completely free and clear from its share of bugs. Some of them are relatively minor while others are outright ridiculous.
One of the ways around the issues of security and control that make some businesses wary of cloud computing is to build a private cloud -- one that remains within the corporate firewall and is wholly controlled internally. Private clouds also increase the agility of IT an organization's IT infrastructure and make it easier to roll out new technology projects. Download this eBook to get the facts behind the private cloud and learn how your organization can get started.