It seems like every time Ubuntu makes any sort of change, the Linux community finds itself up in arms as if the world is about to end. First, they expressed concern over Unity, then the Amazon search results inclusion and now Mir vs Wayland. Admittedly, I don't personally use Unity as my default desktop these days, as I don't use any of its features. That said, however, I'm a big fan of the Ubuntu base that I run with XFCE. This desktop environment serves me well, and my experience with the Ubuntu base has never given me any serious problems.
In this article, I'll examine some of the most common fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) surrounding Ubuntu, areas where Ubuntu has accomplished seemingly impossible feats and some other important considerations.
Frequently, I see open source community members express the idea that everything Ubuntu does should benefit the entire Linux ecosystem. For example, when Valve first began working with Canonical to provided support for Ubuntu, some within the Linux community were upset because their distro wasn't initially supported. Despite the fact that this had nothing to do with Ubuntu's goals, the community's expectation is that anytime Ubuntu makes strides to bring in a new player into the fold, that Canonical needs to ensure that other distros are included as well. Newsflash folks — this isn't Canonical's problem.
More importantly, when Ubuntu does make new strides to gain adoption with a product previously unavailable, other distributions of Linux are also free to reach out on their own behalf. In other words, stop blaming Ubuntu and Canonical for your distribution's lack of a decent outreach approach.
Without question, the most ridiculous Ubuntu FUD issue I've ever seen was the idea that Canonical should have "intervened" to keep Adobe Flash and AIR alive for Linux users. There are two things wrong with this: first, Flash is a horrible technology that eats CPUs alive because of its poor resource management. Secondly, Adobe AIR wasn't much better. Besides all of that, Google will be maintaining their own Flash offering for those who simply have to have it. And of course, there is the tiny issue that this wasn't Canonical's problem. Clearly, they either weren't interested in intervening or simply knew their concerns submitted to Adobe would be met with deaf ears.
The fact of the matter is that an absence of Flash for Canonical, is going to translate into less forum threads filled with users complaining about how Firefox crashed due to an Adobe Flash problem. I see dumping Adobe Flash as an overdue event.
If you use your favorite search engine to query "Ubuntu hate," you might be surprised to see how absurd some of the viewpoints actually are. You'll find search results ranging from "Ubuntu makes me use Unity" to "Ubuntu is spyware." So what is actually happening here?
Based on my research, the Ubuntu hate is actually a good thing. The sheer number of folks raging about Ubuntu indicate that the distribution is at critical mass. It's grown to a point that the disdain for it is approaching that of other operating systems such as Windows and OS X.
Let's address some of the complaints head on.
Ubuntu forces us to use Unity: Factually, this is incorrect. Don't use Unity if you don't want to. I'm fairly sure no one from Canonical is going to visit you in the middle of the night and force you to do anything relating to Ubuntu. You're free to use Unity-free desktop environments such as XFCE, KDE, LXDE, and these days, even the Gnome 3 desktop.
Ubuntu is spyware: This entire fiasco revolves around the inclusion of Amazon search results within the Unity dash. And while I maintain that from the usability point of view, the feature stinks—it's hardly spyware. You can turn it off easily from the settings menu. A more accurate description would be "ad-supported" or "affiliate-supported software" instead of calling it "spyware." Some might even get away with calling the Amazon lens for Ubuntu "adware," but then again, so are most apps found in the Android marketplace — as in, they're ad-supported.
(Random feature) is broken now, so Ubuntu sucks: Reviewing the various sites hosting complaints about Ubuntu, you'll quickly notice how devoid of specifics or logic most of them are. Hating Ubuntu because you dislike something about it — and then posting a rant — is self-defeating. And while I accept that newbies may not know any better, I find myself at a loss for words when I see experienced users doing the same. Most of the time, whatever is thought to be broken isn't Ubuntu-specific. Often times, it's either a kernel bug or something to do with the desktop environment specifically. The beauty of Linux on the desktop is if something isn't working well, you can try an alternative. More often than not, the alternative will resolve the problem.