Download the authoritative guide: Cloud Computing 2019: Using the Cloud for Competitive Advantage
Thousands of people are involved in the Linux development community, many of them lending their voices to the project on any given day.
But when one voice in particular speaks, people listen: Linus Torvalds, the benevolent creator and dictator of the Linux kernel.org effort, has thrown his weight in favor of the GPL (define) version 2 open source license instead of the new GPL version 3.
He did hint, however, that he could change his mind about future versions of GPL v. 3.
In an interview with Linux Foundation Executive Director Jim Zemlin, Torvalds responded to questions about his role and specifically about his choice of license for the Linux kernel.
Torvalds stressed in the interview that he doesn't necessarily care about one license versus another - only that he works with one that makes the most sense for his efforts.
For Torvalds, that means working with GPLv2.
GPLv3, he continued, is about achieving the goals of the Free Software Foundation, which is the organization that manages the GPL and led the effort to create the GPLv3. In Torvalds' view, there has always been a tension between the FSF and Linux.
"In some ways, Linux was the project that really made the split clear between what the FSF is pushing which is very different from what open source and Linux has always been about, which is more of a technical superiority instead of a -- this religious belief in freedom," Torvalds told Zemlin.
"So, the GPL Version 3 reflects the FSF's goals and the GPL Version 2 pretty closely matches what I think a license should do and so right now, Version 2 is where the kernel is."
Since Torvalds first released Linux, it has been licensed under the GPL version 2 open source license. In 2007, however, the GPL was updated to GPL version 3 including new provisions for DRM and patent protections.
Torvalds however has been publicly opposed to the GPL version 3 from its earliest days in 2006. In the nearly two years since, Torvalds public position has hardly wavered in his opposition to adoption of the new license.
But he did open the door just a little, in response to a follow-up question from Zemlin. But it took some caveats to get there.