Download the authoritative guide: Cloud Computing 2018: Using the Cloud to Transform Your Business
The Uptime Institute is preparing to release a series of case studies that show many datacenters are not well managed and could become much more efficient without having to spend a dime on new gear. The research was done in 2008.
The common sales pitch for achieving datacenter efficiency is to toss out all of the old and replace with shiny new blinking black boxes. That might suit the likes of IBM, HP and Dell just fine, but Kenneth Brill, executive director of the Uptime Institute, an organization dedicated to improving datacenter power efficiency, said that's not what's needed.
"This is not a technology problem it's an economic and leadership problem," he told InternetNews.com. "The economics of IT has fundamentally changed. Those companies that don't get it will start to see an economic impact."
Today, companies have their rows upon rows of x86 servers, switches, backup systems and storage housed in separate facilities, and are putting so much into brick and mortar facilities that profitability is being affected, said Brill.
Under one roof
The first problem is that these facilities are not managed by IT, they are often managed by another part of the company that handles facilities. "IT never sees their own energy bill," said Brill. "The CIO needs to be more economically-aware of these things."
Facilities and IT expenses are siloed and kept separate from each other in most organizations, which Brill says has to change. "Companies need to move facilities and IT under a common organization so IT has a motivation to fix the brick and mortar part of the equation," said Brill. Facilities used to be a trivial expense, but as datacenters grew to the size of football fields, it's not trivial any more, he added.
Dean Nelson, senior director of global lab & datacenter design services for Sun Microsystems (NASDAQ: JAVA), mentioned this very issue recently in a discussion of Sun's new high efficiency datacenter in Colorado.
"I would say if you don't have someone in my job, you need one, because the job is to translate between the facility and it groups, and if you don't they become opposing forces, usually, because they have different agendas," he said.
The facilities side wants to keep things small and they don't want to build if at all possible, while the IT side is all about performance, so they are asking for density, which facilities doesn't want to pay for.
"I moved out of IT and engineering for the company and into real estate. It was a really interesting transition but I'm glad we did this because it gave me a completely different perspective as to what they need on the real estate side. Also, we brought the competence around IT into real estate so we can make more informed decisions," said Nelson.