It's Time to Rethink Chinese Tech Manufacturing

We don't need more cheap tech gadgets, we to be more concerned about where our phones, tablets and other consumer electronics come from.
Posted February 24, 2011

Mike Elgan

Mike Elgan

(Page 1 of 2)

I love my iPhone 4. It's sleek, elegant, durable and very high quality.

But after reading a recent report by Apple, I started thinking about the workers who make the gadgets and computers in our lives. Were they children coerced into lying about their age by their own schools? Were the workers poisoned with illegal industrial chemicals?

What's my responsibility in all this? After all, we chose to buy the devices we love in part because they're both affordable and high quality. Is all that made possible by the pain of abused factory workers?

Worse, it has become clear to me that, despite promises of reform by all concerned, the problems of Chinese manufacturing are not going to get better any time soon.

Apple Finds Factories Rotten to the Core

Last week, Apple released a document called The Supplier Responsibility 2011 Progress Report, in which they detailed findings of a series of audits of factories that make Apple hardware. Apple also laid out their intentions in the report for addressing the problems they discovered.

The report says 137 workers in factories where Apple products are assembled were poisoned by a nasty chemical called n-hexane 137, which was used without Apple's knowledge or permission. The chemical causes cancer, brain damage and other health problems. Some workers exposed have even publically appealed to Apple for help.

Less than one-third of the factories that make Apple products even appear to comply with Apple's rule that workers can't work more than 60 hours per week or 6 days per week. Many of the workers who make our gadgets work 7 days a week.

Slightly more than half the factories even appear to comply with Apple's safety standards. That's far better than the average Chinese factory, no doubt. One New York Times report from about three years ago offered up this gruesome statistic: In the Pearl River Delta area, where some of the most intense manufacturing takes place in China, workers collectively lose about 40,000 fingers per year.

Apple reminded us of the 13 suicides and suicide attempts at one Foxconn plant alone. One of those suicides was by a man who made a dollar an hour and had averaged more than 70 hours a week during the previous month, in violation of Apple's employment rules.

Some 30 percent of the factories Apple inspected failed standards on emissions, hazardous material management and environmental permits.

In some cases, Apple gave factories lists of demands for improved working conditions to keep earning Apple business. In others, Apple terminated its contract. One factory alone was found to be employing 42 child workers. Apple found that the factory was conspiring with a local school to falsify IDs and threaten kids if they didn't lie to auditors about their age.

The list of abuses by factories in China, partly illuminated by the Apple report, seem to go on and on.

Why China Won't Change

We've been down this road before. Every few years, some Western company is either shamed into disclosing or issues a report voluntarily about the ghastly realities of Chinese manufacturing. Everybody vows to try harder. The factories and outsource manufacturing firms claim to implement new programs to curtail abuses and violations. Workers get a raise (never mind that they'll be forced to retire in their 30s so management can bring in younger, more timid and lower-paid workers).

And the Chinese government often announces bold new initiative and laws to fix the problems. Everybody is reassured, and then it's back to business as usual.

The problems never get fixed. There are three main reasons for that.

First, some of the manufacturing is specialized. Apple is a perfect example. Only a small handful of companies in the world can deliver iPhones to Apple with the quality, quantity, flexibility and speed that they currently do. To find an alternative to these companies would put Apple at a competitive disadvantage.

And these huge companies have enormous control over the entire supply chain of components that go into gadgets. Apple could move its manufacturing elsewhere, but then find itself unable to acquire enough screens, for example.

Apple depends on these companies more than they depend on Apple. And so Apple's power to effect real change is much more limited than its rosy report would lead us to believe.

Second, the whole Chinese system is fundamentally problematic. After decades of catastrophic experiments with collectivization, cultural revolution and Maoist socialism (all of which left China desperately poor), China finally found a winning combination in the form of capitalist markets plus Communist Party controlled authoritarianism. China is still in its "catch-up" phase of development, and all sectors of the Chinese political and economic systems are focused on rapid development at all costs.

Even the courts are generally on board with the government's goals of rapid industrialization, which makes sense given their lack of independence from the Communist Party. Judges often rule against workers, foreign companies and any others who might apply brakes to the Chinese manufacture-and-export juggernaut.

Page 1 of 2

1 2
Next Page

0 Comments (click to add your comment)
Comment and Contribute


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.



IT Management Daily
Don't miss an article. Subscribe to our newsletter below.

By submitting your information, you agree that datamation.com may send you Datamation offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that Datamation believes may be of interest to you. Datamation will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.