Download the authoritative guide: Cloud Computing 2018: Using the Cloud to Transform Your Business
Is there a need for a separate EULA (end user license agreement) in the open source Mozilla browser? To date there has been, but that EULA is going to change very soon.
In a conversation with InternetNews.com, Mitchell Baker, chairperson of Mozilla, admitted that Mozilla may not need both the EULA and open source license, with the EULA the likely casualty. That said, there is a need for something in between the open source license and the user which is what Baker and Mozilla are actively working on.
The issue of Firefox's EULA has raised concerns in the Linux community lately with questions arising about the need and validity of the EULA.
Ubuntu Linux founder Mark Shuttleworth argued this week that the EULA for Firefox was a not a best practice for open source software while other Ubuntu users labeled the EULA as a bug. Red Hat's Fedora Linux isn't in favor the current Firefox EULA either. Fedora Project Leader Paul Frields noted that Fedora has been working with Mozilla since before the release of Firefox 3 on this issue, and those discussions are still ongoing.
"We're concerned about the fact that Mozilla feels that Firefox requires a EULA for use of the software," Frields told InternetNews.com. "We continue to believe that the Mozilla Public License is a perfectly valid license for Firefox binaries and source code."
For Novell's OpenSUSE, the EULA has been a temporary annoyance as well.
"I understand the shock that people might feel the first time they see an application popping up a EULA -- and I dearly hope it doesn't become a standard practice with OSS apps -- but in the general scope of things, I don't think it's an enormous burden on the user, since it's a one-time issue," Joe "Zonker" Brockmeier, Novell's openSUSE community manager, told InternetNews.com.
Under the approach Baker said Mozilla will be taking with Firefox though, she's confident that many of the concerns of the Linux community will be addressed. That said she does feel that an agreement behind just having the source code licensed under an open source license is necessary.