Love it or hate it, Ubuntu is the target distribution for Valve, Lightworks and many other Linux newcomers. Because Ubuntu dominates the Linux news and appears to be the biggest usage target among users, claiming that the geekier distributions are going to lead the way would be plain silly. For most newbies, Ubuntu is the first stop in their individual Linux adventures.
Accepting this, it would then be rational to state that if 2013 were indeed to be the year of the Linux desktop, the proper adaptation of this would then be "2013 is the year of the Ubuntu desktop" instead. That's not because Ubuntu is the only distribution out there, but rather because it's the one attracting the new users. And within news circles, this is what is considered the big story within the desktop Linux space.
As things stand now, most new-to-Ubuntu users appear to be coming from word of mouth, school, user forums, or other related sources. No one is trying Ubuntu because they found it at Amazon or some big box store. And in my mind, this is a problem that needs to be addressed. While others out there are looking to pull in as many big named software titles as possible, I would counter that with where things stand now. Ubuntu on the desktop would explode if it was offered within a kiosk environment. The key focus needs to be a proper introduction for the Ubuntu newcomer.
For 2013 to be the year of Ubuntu, we need to stop living in denial and get serious about non-geek, mainstream, kiosk-oriented solutions. If you think I'm wrong, ask ten random people in your community about their thoughts on Linux or Ubuntu Linux and then behold their bewilderment. And good luck trying to get your big box store to allow you to host on their property a kiosk with which you're promoting software that they don't receive revenue from.
In the enterprise space, Linux adoption has been successful because it relates to money for the companies who choose to embrace Linux. In other words, using Linux is saving companies money while allowing certain tasks to be completed. In the consumer desktop space, however, there aren't any IT managers seeking out cheaper alternatives. This chore falls squarely on whomever is making the PC purchasing decision for any given household. And unfortunately, this often means falling prey to whatever the latest "sale of the week" happens to be in the purchaser's locale.
So even though more savvy consumers will do their homework and check out who has the best prices on PCs and notebooks, in the end the results end up the same – Windows or OS X. Sadly, Ubuntu-based systems are not as prevalent as I would like when folks do these types of comparisons. And to make matters worse, it's going to take money and influence to bring Ubuntu to center stage. As things stand now, Ubuntu remains a geeks' operating system not because it's difficult to use, rather because it's not found in place regular people frequent.
I've given it a lot of thought, and I think that the best approach to making 2013 the year of the Ubuntu desktop is in this article from October, which recommends taking Linux to the people and attracting corporate sponsors. Address these issues, allow graphics support to mature a little more, and we will begin to see more "mom and pop" user adoption in the Linux space. With Ubuntu offering awesome support with Ubuntu One for backing up one's home directory, and mainstream applications beginning to show themselves in the ranks of Ubuntu's choice of software options, it's clearly a great time to be a Linux user.
With everything above taken into consideration, I still don't think that 2013 is going to be the year of the Ubuntu desktop. No, I think it's better to look at it the issue incrementally, noting each user who finds success in using Ubuntu. I, with countless others, have made it a personal mission to make every year an Ubuntu celebration instead.