Based on my past experience, these words were not usually a positive indicator of cheery news from Sam, my peer manager from the product development team.
I knew what was coming: Ashish, one of the developers on my client services team, had been bugging me about moving over to Sams group. However, we were already short-staffed, so I told Ashish wed reevaluate next year. Because of our implementation backlog we really needed him to stay put for now.
Ashish didnt give up. He made his case to my (pretend) buddy Sam. I call him that because Sam pretended to be my buddy whenever he wanted something.
Sam came back to me: You know Ashish wants to come over to my engineering team and I know client services is short-staffed. I propose a trade. You take Sandra and we take Ashish.
As I started to object, Sam raised his hand and said, Before you say no, think about this. Sandra makes less money and she has as much experience as Ashish. Plus her communication skills are superb.
All these things were true, especially the communication skills comment. The ability to easily communicate with our customers was a key job requirement for our team. Ashish did a decent job, considering English was his second language. On the other hand, Ashish said he preferred not to deal with customers and this was a chance to keep him happy within our company, so he wouldnt look elsewhere.
She had bounced around to every technically-oriented team except mine, spending time not only in software development, but also quality assurance, product management and documentation.
It wasnt that she wasnt technically capable. She could hold her own with the other developers. The problem was her attitude.
She was unusually combative if someone disagreed with her. To put it briefly which Sandra herself never did she was extremely difficult to work with.
Everyone on the management team knew she would have been fired, except that she was a minority. I wont get into her ethnic background because I know how stereotypes work, and dont want this story viewed through a biased lens.
I will say that HR had warned each of her managers to document every single event that caused consternation for her coworkers and manager, especially related to performance reviews.
Considering that conspicuous history, youd think this would be an easy call for me. Alas, the CEO of the company also came to see me about taking Sandra onto our team.
His pitch went something like your interpersonal skills are off the charts and I know youll find a way to manage Sandra without a problem. In other words, Im afraid to fire her and get sued, and you are our last best hope to prevent lawyers from becoming involved.
I have nice guy syndrome that doesnt always translate well in intra-company politics. So against my better judgment, I acquiesced.
In my defense, I had turned around a couple other difficult personalities in the past and thought I could pull it off with Sandra.
I should have given it a lot more thought.
This was old hat for her. The client services team was just one more stop on her merry-go-round.
She sat in my office and politely smiled, nodding her head as I explained her new role and responsibilities. I didnt bring up any of the negative history because I didnt see a need to rehash what happened.
One of the ways around the issues of security and control that make some businesses wary of cloud computing is to build a private cloud -- one that remains within the corporate firewall and is wholly controlled internally. Private clouds also increase the agility of IT an organization's IT infrastructure and make it easier to roll out new technology projects. Download this eBook to get the facts behind the private cloud and learn how your organization can get started.