ITs time for a revolution.
Were all tangled up in technologies, processes, standards, governance and deranged technology managers who report to paranoid business executives. God bless the entrepreneurs who keep creating new technology that unfortunately more often than not confuse those expected to exploit IT for business value.
How about costs? While infrastructure technology continues to get cheaper, many of us are still paying ridiculous enterprise software licensing and maintenance fees. Perfect storm clouds are gathering finally but how will companies enter the cloud? Servers from Amazon?
And leadership? Whos minding the store? A 50-plus data center veteran or a Gen X-er (or, better yet, a Gen Y-er) steeped in social media? What is social media? Are companies embracing that which they dont understand again or are they avoiding that which they think they understand? Globalization is stressing every organizational structure on the planet. Are we responding appropriately to the decentralization of business?
Are we out of control? Pretty much. Were still fighting stupid battles about governance, standardization, technology adoption, software delivery, hardware acquisition, wireless deployment and even compensation. Is this really all that hard? Please.
I have never seen so many flat learning curves in my life. After nearly thirty years in this business I cannot believe how little progress weve made optimizing business technology. I am aware of companies running multiple enterprise data base management platforms, multiple instances of multiple ERP systems and multiple global infrastructures. There are lots of companies still on social media search-and-destroy missions, trying their best to kill anything new, fun or strategic. Just as many companies still cant find their customer data.
(All of that said, I also work with some companies that really get IT and have long since stopped forming circular firing squads.)
Business technology optimization is absolutely no different from healthcare reform. The delivery of cost-effective healthcare occurs in countless countries where universal coverage costs less than 5% of the gross domestic product (GDP), resulting in impressive performance rankings. In the US, we still dont even with the new legislation deliver healthcare to all of our citizens. We continue to spend nearly 15% of our GDP on healthcare and have generated a solid 38th world performance ranking.
Is healthcare doable? I mean if Americans cant do it, I guess it just cant be done, right? Healthcare is obviously and easily doable. Just look around the world. All we have to do is remove the profit motive, regulate prescription drug prices and set prices for procedures like everyone else does. But you have to want to do these things. You have to decide that making money from peoples misfortunes is wrong, that one of the few real responsibilities government has to its citizens is quality healthcare for all of its taxpayers.
The sad truth is that our politicians bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists have no interest in reforming the look or feel of the golden goose. Why should they?
Do we not have a set of best practices around the acquisition, deployment and support of information technology? Are these best practices hidden somewhere out of reach from technology managers and executives?
Have we forgotten how to write technology business cases, conduct cost-benefit analyses, calculate ROI or TCO or assess performance? I contend that like healthcare reform business technology optimization is very doable. Of course, we have to really want to do IT. So whats the problem? IT is always about the people, the corporate culture, the senior management team and the stupid processes that simultaneously anger and pleasure the inmates who run the asylum.
Is it all hopeless? Not at all.
Heres how the revolution begins.
You need smart, passionate people for your revolution. If the troops are tired, disenfranchised, cynical or just cashing a check then you will suffer the Iraq/ Afghanistan effect: trying to muster a solid army to fight for a cause it only half-way understands.
If the general feeling among the troops is that things are essentially OK then the chances of a successful revolution are non-existent.
This is your first test: if theres no interest in a revolution then you have two choices: shut up or leave. But if theres a lot of discontentment then the environment may be ripe for revolution. Gather the right people, get rid of the spies and sycophants, and develop your strategy and tactics with a core team of dedicated revolutionaries.
You will be surprised how many people feel the way you do. Remember, there is strength in numbers.
The second test is the corporate culture and the attitudes of the senior management team (SMT). If they are tired, rich, ready-to-retire, angry, clueless and/or punitive, then you have a real problem: its likely that there will be executions the moment you light the first fuse.
But if the SMT is shaky and the board of directors is worried, then theres an opportunity to rethink organization and governance, adopt alternative X-as-a-service delivery models and empower the business with Web 2.0, social media and other technologies.
Its essential that you assess the state of the management team as perceived by the stakeholders the investors, the shareholders, the board of directors, the vendors and the corporate partners. If theres wide and deep criticism of the job the SMT is doing, then a revolution is quite possible. In fact, it may well be welcomed by otherwise paralyzed stakeholders. If the light is green then by all means proceed.