Managing IT: Changing Our Minds (About Everything): Page 2

(Page 2 of 2)

Will you let everyone bring their computers to work? Or will they have to stay standardized on Dells, HPs or Lenovos? Why? Try thinking about things differently. Maybe it’s more about network connectivity than PC standardization.

What about devices? Are you still deploying fat clients on some hardware migration or “refresh” schedule? Let’s change our minds about all this. How many of us need fat clients with the amazing computing power they provide?

Smart phones – otherwise known as mobile thin clients – are more than adequate for a huge segment of professionals in many companies. Why are we still living in the “break and fix” world of the 1980s and 1990s? Do you actually support PCs at your company?

What if you changed your mind about thin versus fat clients, leasing versus buying, paying-by-the-drink versus paying-by-the-box and matching computing and communications requirements to professionals who may or may not need anything more than a smart phone with a 3G browser? My guess is that we could all reduce our acquisition, deployment and support costs by over 50% while providing more mobility and flexibility to our internal and external technology clients.

The whole concept of networks and networking is changing. We used to think about finite (and controllable) local and wide area networks (and then virtual private networks) as our communications highways, but all that’s changed since the Internet emerged as a bona fide platform, and interoperability and reuse emerged through service-oriented architectures.

Networks are continuous, not discrete, as semi-automated and fully automated transaction processing emerges as the raison d’etre of ubiquitous networks. Those execs who are 100 pointers will find it really hard to change their minds about open/continuous/ubiquitous network architectures because they scare the hell out of baby-boomers.

Web 2.0 tools are redefining why we want communications and collaboration. Wikis, blogs, RSS filters, folksonomies, mashups, podcasts, social networks, crowdsourcing and virtual worlds are pushing networks to new supporting roles – roles that are growing by leaps and bounds. Try putting the Web 2.0 genie back in the bottle. I dare you.

Let’s all change our minds about people. Some of our people are ready, able and willing to change with the times, but some are not at all interested in what tomorrow brings. You know what – and who – I mean. The exploitation of new technology is directly proportional to the trajectory of the changes we “extend and embrace” (remember that phrase?).

Debating endlessly about whether or not open software, cloud computing or SaaS have any merit is a waste of time – and most likely a diversionary tactic designed to slow – if not outright kill – the pace of change.

Can we change our minds about everything? Maybe the first step is to get the points down to under 100. If anyone tells you that leadership doesn’t matter they’re way over fifty – and probably in charge.

Leadership is key to perspective, strategy and, yes, the vision thing: it’s hard to see forward when age and experience has made you near-sighted. I have observed over the past few years that the massive changes in the field have fallen victim to all varieties of sabotage by 50 and 100 pointers.

They’ve described the changes as risky, scary, stupid, not-ready-for-prime-time, expensive, insecure and unlikely-to-scale, among other adjectives and accusations intended to keep SaaS, HaaS, open source, cloud computing, etc. at arms length – at least until they pass away.

Steve Andriole is the Thomas G. Labrecque Professor of Business at Villanova University where he conducts applied research in business fl‡ technology convergence. He is also the co-founder of The Acentio Group, a new economy consortium that focuses on optimizing investments in information technology. He is formerly the Senior Vice President & Chief Technology Officer of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. and the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President for Technology Strategy at CIGNA Corporation. His career began at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency where he was the Director of Cybernetics Technology. He can be reached at

Page 2 of 2

Previous Page
1 2

Tags: open source, Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, Larry Ellison

0 Comments (click to add your comment)
Comment and Contribute


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.