Free Newsletters :

Articles in “May 2010” from Datamation Blog

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for david-strom.jpg
by David Strom

When was the last time you actually hauled out a printed copy of your dictionary and looked up the meaning or spelling of a particular word? I am thinking for me it has been at least a decade, and indeed I don't even own a printed copy anymore. Who needs all that paper when there are so many fine Web sites, such as M-W.com, dictionary.com, and even Google will give you a definition if you just precede your word of interest with the word define.

But looking stuff up on the Web is so last year; now we have an app
for that. Several apps, of course: on the Apple AppStore, there are
four free apps, including two from Dictionary.com for the iPad and the
iPhone apiece. And Dictionary.com has apps for Blackberries and
Android, as well as providing definitions on its Web site too.

The vendor has actually taken the time to analyze how people use their
apps and Web site to look up words. And they found some very
interesting trends that I will share with you here. For those of you
that are word nerds, enjoy.

First, iPhone users are more utilitarian and just want to get a
definition in the moment. They use them mostly during the workweek.
Same with the Blackberry and Android app users. iPad users are looking
for entertainment, if such a thing could be said about dictionary
usage. They are more likely to play the audio files to hear
pronunciation, getting the word of the day, and actually playing games
with their dictionary apps. They use their app on weekends more too
and spend about 25% more time on the app per session than the other
users.

Second, the mobile apps are getting more usage than the Web site,
about two or three times more often. It seems that people want to get
definitions when they are in the moment. I am sure the Dictionary.com
apps have settled quite a few bar arguments. But what is also apparent
from the Dictionary.com usage data is that "people are just as
interested in word discovery when there's no immediate need," says the
press release from the company.

So when you think about developing the next great iPhone app, think
about these analytics. Spend some time reviewing your user data to see
trends and patterns, and think about ways that your mobile app can
complement the content on your existing Web site. Satisfyingly, one of
the most often searched-for words using the Dictionary.com app is
erudite. You'll have to look it up.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for david-strom.jpg
by David Strom

In the past week, I have spent way too much time dealing with product
pricing issues on a number of fronts. It shouldn't be so hard to get a
price - my motto is that the harder it takes to find out pricing, the
less motivated customers are going to be to buy it.

Let's give you some circumstances. I am back again reviewing products
for eWeek (please, don't all email me about your products, PR folks).
For one review, it took four days, 10 emails and phone calls to get
the actual price of the product. The PR person initially sent me
something that looked like Egyptian hieroglyphics that didn't make any
sense to either of us (why did she send it, you might reasonably ask).
Of course, the vendor didn't have any prices on their Web site, at
least not that I could find.

As a journalist, this gets my goat. I often hear, "We don't want our
competitors to know about our pricing." Or "We use multiple tiers so
our VARs set their own prices." Hogwash. What these vendors are really
saying, "We don't have a clue what to charge for our product/service."
Shame on them!

For a client, I was recently working with them on their plan for their
new software release. One of my issues is its current pricing model,
which has five degrees of freedom:

*  Number of PCs supported
* Three  different "levels" or overall pricing tiers
* Overall capacity
* Two different software versions
* Other surcharges for extra features

That works out to many thousand different prices. You need a
spreadsheet to figure out what you are going to pay. Now, granted,
there are some complex software products out there and you don't want
to leave money on the table and charge fairly for your product. But
five different knobs to turn before you can calculate a price? Not
good.

I was a judge in a local competition put on by our county economic
development office to pick wining business plans that would receive a
nice $50k cash prize. In the five semi-finalist plans that I reviewed,
three of them were missing pricing information. The plans were well
thought out, had plenty of detail about the company's prospective
businesses, and even had copious pages of spreadsheets showing how the
business was going to make tons of money in year 4. But without the
actual price of the product or service, this information is just a lot
of hot air. How can you tell if your business is going to be
competitive? What is the sensitivity of your price to your market?   I
asked these questions of my semi-finalists and you could see that they
just didn't make the connection. Uh-oh.

So folks, here's my advice. Keep it simple. Better yet, make a free
version available for a limited time or a limited number of users or
PCs or whatever. And if you can't put your prices online where your
customers can see them, then you shouldn't be in business.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for david-strom.jpg
by David Strom

I have been writing about the Web since it was nearly invented in the
early 1990s and one of my continued sources of amusement is the snake
oil search engine optimization vendors. Repeat after me: content is
king. Everything else is just a shell game.

In our rush to better our rankings, we tend to forget why people are
using search engines to begin with: to find the best content. Those
search sites that don't deliver (remember Altavista? Or Yahoo, for
that matter?) are going to find out really quickly that their users
will go elsewhere.

What does that mean for you as a Web site owner that is trying to move
up in the charts? It means you first have to focus on your content,
and deliver what your visitors want. It is a matter of managing
expectations, but also about making sure that your content is
continually tuned and adjusted to meet the needs of your ever-evolving
audience.

What it doesn't mean is hiring some SEO firm to tweak your meta tags,
flog your links, and hire a bunch of offshore keyboard pushers to
promote your pages.

I got a PR pitch for an SEO company that I would rather not promote
here, but the essence of their existence is that charge their clients
only after the desired rankings have been achieved, with a sliding
scale depending on whether you end up higher or lower than your goals.
This is just utter nonsense, although the company is growing by leaps
and bounds.

I coincidentally was meeting with a young entrepreneur here in St.
Louis last week who runs a real business that is based on carefully
tweaking search engine results. His name is Mark Sawyier
(mark.sawyier@offcampusmedia.com), and his business is in listing
apartments near major colleges around the country.
(Movingoffcampus.com is just one of dozens of domains that he owns.)
He is the cyberspace version of a major urban real estate developer:
he understands SEO, Google Analytics, and how to play in a game where
you live and die by your rankings and page views. He has managed to up
his pay per click rates from his sponsors because
a.      He has tons of content - in this case apartment listings,
b.      He has tons of relevant content - the apartments are listed by
proximity to campus and other things that students are searching for,
and
c.      Results - because the people searching actually end up as renters
more often from his site than his competitors.

He told me: "The fact is that the combination of the constantly
changing algorithms search engines use to calculate rankings with
increased competition from other websites, guaranteeing someone a rank
and still playing by the rules, to me, is almost impossible. They
would need infinite resources and time and have to have a ridiculous
amount of startup capital to get it going."

I offer my own modest example to buttress what Mark says. I have a
page on my Web site that I have maintained for more than a decade. It
is a simple list of dozens of Web conferencing vendors, with some
basics on what they cost and what client platforms they support. I
spend about an hour a year on maintaining this listing.

A few years ago, I started getting unsolicited emails from vendors of
conferencing products who wanted me to list them on my list. Then I
realized why: a quick Google search on the term "web conferencing
services" has me in the top ten results. Did I stuff my page full of
keywords? Did I abuse my meta-tags? Did I hire a bunch of third-world
keyboarders to hit my page? Did I pay some SEO firm to work their
magic? Did I have some special insight into how Google ranks my page?

No, no, and no. I just doggedly set out to provide good content, week
after week. And gradually, this got results. It may take years, but
eventually, as Mark says, the best content will win.

So instead of gaming SEO or hiring someone to push you up the page
charts, think about making a quality website with tons of content.
Mark reminds me: "search engines are ALWAYS trying to connect people
that use them to search for information online with the absolute best
websites to provide it - the minute any of them lose sight of this
objective, they will stop being a good search engine. This is the core
concept behind all of the variables and algorithms that go into
calculating search engine rankings. And while external links and
proper SEO coding are certainly important elements in the battle, at
the end of the day, the most important thing is having a website that
provides the right answers and information to the searchers."

And if you really must hire someone to do your SEO, think of hiring
Mark. Off Campus Media offers campus, social media and search engine
marketing services using his own experience with building his own Web
sites.

Search Datamation Blog