"Quality journalism is not cheap," Murdoch said, after his company reported a $3.4 billion loss for the first half of the year. "The digital revolution has opened many new and inexpensive distribution channels but it has not made content free. We intend to charge for all our news websites."I certainly agree that quality journalism isn't cheap, and based on News Corp.'s massive losses, neither is the brand of journalism practiced by outlets such as Fox News. It appears that promoting tea parties and "birther" conspiracies are costly endeavors.
He anticipates this change will go into effect within the year, and that by next summer even his tabloid newspapers -- which sell on newsstands for pennies -- will be surrounded by pay walls. "I believe that if we're successful, we'll be followed fast by other media," he added.
Charging for content brings marketing and customer-service costs. Online, it reduces audience and the advertising they justify. Putting content behind a wall cuts it off from search and links; they cut off your Googlejuice.
When publishers build those walls, they open the door for free competitors, who can now enter the content business with virtually no barrier to entry. Publishers who fool themselves into thinking pay will save the day only further forestall the innovation and experimentation that is the only possible path to success online.
I'm eager to see what happens, though I think there's a distinct possibility that Murdoch will change his mind as reality sinks in. We'll find out soon enough.