Free Newsletters :

Articles in “November 2005” from Datamation Blog

In the grand cinematic tradition of Son of Kong, Son of the Pinkpanther, and Son of Flubber, comes news from Washington, D.C., that everyone's favorite piece of legislation — Sarbanes-Oxley — may breed an offspring. Writing over at CIOUpdate, John Webster of the Data Mobility Group, expects more legislation aimed at protecting information and preventing identity theft. What's that, you say? There are too many such proposals in various states of review and passage in almost every state in the union as well as the Federal government?
At last count, there were upwards of twenty different pieces of federal legislation floating around Capitol Hill. While it doesn't appear that anyone of them will reach the floor of either house of Congress in the very near future, I am certain that at least one of them will.
Sarbanes-Oxley targeted information risk, but it had more far-reaching consequences. That's true of most pieces of legislation, in particular the bills that get rushed through in response to a public outcry or panic. There's a list of several such examples in this article from The CPA Journal. Webster says we should expect more of the same.
Sarbanes-Oxley created a legal obligation to save certain types of electronic records. As such, it set a legal precedent. As similar precedent will likely be set again next year, although this one (call it "Son of Sarbanes" if you wish) will be aimed at making it harder for those who somehow acquire personal data to actually use that data.
 

Arpan Shah, who works on SharePoint and Content Management Server for Microsoft, is talking about enterprise software adoption. Once you build or buy and set up an enterprise application, you still have to get your users to start using it. It's a sales job, and it's often difficult because people naturally resist changes.
I strongly feel there are 3 pillars that IT Pros must closely examine when they want a technology to be adopted after it's been implemented. Most people focus on Migration. Others focus on education. There are three pillars: Migration, Education and Policy.
The trick to migration is making sure you move the important stuff, but not everything. You can also phase in the new application so that users aren't focred to deal with an abrupt change.
 

IT's immediate future will belong to generalists -- at least according to Gartner, Inc. The technology market research company today unveiled six trends for the next year and beyond. Of greatest relevance to IT workers is this one:
The job market for IT specialists will shrink 40 percent by 2010.
According to Gartner, IT pros must move "from technical specialization to business competence in order to position themselves as tomorrow's business contributors." In other words, goodbye "specialists," hello "versatilists" (Gartner's word, not mine). Assuming you get to keep your job, Gartner also predicts that it will become more challenging, thanks to compliance requirements:
Through 2008, investigation of new technologies will slow as discretionary dollars are diverted to regulatory compliance.
Here are Gartner's four other forecasts, as outlined in DMReview:
  • By 2008, one in 10 organizations will require employee-purchased notebooks, possibly offering a "notebook allowance" to offset costs.
  • By 2010, 30% of American households will use only wireless phone service or Internet telephony.
  • A 50% increase in healthcare software investment by 2009 might lead to a 50% reduction in preventable deaths by 2013.
  • Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt will get back together, move to a commune in Hawaii and have twins.
  • OK, that last prediction was mine, but it's more interesting than the Gartner forecast about BPO service providers and insurance revenue. Snore!
     

    Before the holiday I wrote about Robert X. Cringely and his thoughts on what Google is up to building datacenters all over the place. It's time to re-visit Cringley, as I promised I'd do. Cringely says Google is planning on little black boxes (as yet unnamed) covered in ports for USB, RJ-45, RJ-11, analog, digital video, S-video... you name it.
    Think about the businesses these little gizmos will enable. The trouble with VoIP in the home has been getting the service easily onto your home phone. Then get a box for each phone. The main hurdle of IP TV is getting it from your computer to your big screen TV. Just attach a box to every TV and it is done, with no PC even required. Sounds like Apple's Video Express, eh? On top of entertainment and communication the cubes will support home alarm and automation systems — two businesses that are huge and also not generally on the radar screens of any Google competitors.
    He goes on to say the cubes will be the dumbest smart device around, making it easy to set up and keep safe. That's a good thing because he expects to see them floated around like AOL CDs.
    It will be in Google's interest to provide them in volume to every Google users, which is to say every broadband user everywhere. As a result, Google becomes overnight a major phone company, a major video entertainment provider, a major player in home automation and even medical telemetry.
    For now I'm more interested in what people will make out of the boxes once they're ubiquitous.
     

    Tom Espiner from ZDNet UK managed to get a behind-the-scenes tour of Symantec's Security Operations Center in the U.K., which is where Symantec handles its managed security operations for that part of the world. This was no small feat. Symantec employs a NORAD-style bunker and security plan that seals the center off from the outside world. Visitors to the center have to be announced 24 hours in advance.
    Even the atmosphere inside is highly managed. It is pressurized to 1.5 pounds per square inch greater than outside air pressure, so air is constantly being forced out — handy if someone decides to drop an atomic bomb in the vicinity. In the event of a nuclear attack, the air can be filtered through charcoal, and there are still safeguards in place against a gas attack.
    I know what you're thinking: If someone decides to drop an atomic bomb in the area, it makes that botnet attack from Eastern Europe seem somewhat insignificant, doesn't it? Nuclear attack not withstanding, it's a good read for explaining how managed security operations work and how computer security firms in general are dealing with the explosion in bad stuff out there. Managed security used to be a service targeted by small and medium-sized businesses, but enterprises have been quick to jump on board lately. It's less expensive, in most cases, than monitoring your own network for intrusion detection and prevention, and enterprises are finding it helps with their compliance needs as well.
     

    Yesterday I passed along some good rules from veteran entrepreneur Evan Williams about how to make an Internet start-up succeed. Today I have access to more entrepreneurial insights, and this time we're going multimedia, courtesy of the Stanford University Technology Ventures Program (STVP). STVP has compiled on this page an impressive collection of audios and videos featuring some of technology's most successful start-up gurus sharing their experiences and advice. Among those featured are Larry Page, co-founder of Google, and Google CEO Eric Schmidt; Guy Kawasaki, founder of Garage Technology Ventures and author of The Art of the Start; and Jeff Hawkins, founder of Palm Computing and Handspring. Here are the types of topics you'll find:
    Developing a business plan
    Learning to take risks
    Five biggest mistakes entrepreneurs make
    The videos can either be streamed or downloaded as MPEGs, and audio podcasts also are now available here. In fact, one podcast features the aforementioned Mr. Williams. Access to the videos requires a quick registration, but it's worth it.
     

    This is the time of year when people make lots of lists and lots of big plans. And if your big plan for next year is to launch an Internet company, veteran start-up CEO Evan Williams has posted on his personal blog a battle-tested list of "Ten Rules for Web Startups." The rules Williams lays out are fairly basic, in sort of a Zen way. He asks you to "be" a lot of things, some seemingly contradictory (can you "be casual" and "be picky"? "user-centric" and self-centered?). But it all makes sense. Here's one snippet of wisdom, this one under "be picky":
    Startups are often too eager to accept people or ideas into their world. You can almost always afford to wait if something doesn't feel just right, and false negatives are usually better than false positives.
    And this, from "be balanced":
    What is a startup without bleary-eyed, junk-food-fueled, balls-to-the-wall days and sleepless, caffeine-fueled, relationship-stressing nights? Answer: A lot more enjoyable place to work. Yes, high levels of commitment are crucial. ... But it can't be all the time.
    You can find plenty more of Williams' commonsense advice here. I found his list thanks to Margaret Kane over at Blogma.
     

    Computer virus researcher Eugene Kaspersky, the head of the Kaspersky Lab, published an article last week that offers a pretty detailed overview of the antivirus industry and the problems it faces. While no one recommends giving up on antivirus software, the big takeaway is that it's important to remember antivirus software is not infallible. Kapersky points out five specific problems the industry is facing, two of which deal with the numbers of viruses out there. Where once it was the "script kiddies" doing the isolated damage, things have changed.
    More than 75% of malicious programs — i.e. the overwhelming majority — are created by the criminal computer underground, with the aim of infecting a defined number of computers on the Internet. The number of new viruses and Trojans is now increasing every day by a few hundred — the Kaspersky Virus Lab receives between 200 and 300 new samples a day.
    The other three problems are the inability, many times, to delete malicious code and restore data; resource usage; and incompatibility between antivirus programs. The resource issue I touched on earlier in the month when we talked about viruses that can potentially take advantage of the shortcuts antivirus software uses when scanning files. I'm going to be all about security this week because I'm preparing for our Enterprise Security Challenges for 2006 Webcasts that are coming up in December. Thanks to Brian Krebs for the link.
     

    I call it that not only because that's the weather over two-thirds of the country today, but because today is the busiest online shopping day of the year. It hasn't quite reached the mania of Black Friday, but it's getting close. If you're like me, you avoided the stores on Friday. You probably also used the Thanksgiving holiday to gauge what family members want for Christmas. You're probably also going to be filling at least some of those orders online today. (Not me, however, I have too much work to do. Did you hear that, Chris? Too much work to do.) A story in today's Washington Post puts into perspective how important today is for online retailers.
    The online retail industry has taken to calling today Cyber Monday or Black Monday, named after Black Friday, when many retailers traditionally have started to make a profit — or go into the black — for the year. In a recent survey by Shop.org and BizRate Research, 77 percent of retailers reported that their sales last year increased substantially on the Monday after Thanksgiving.
    I used to cover online shopping pretty extensively when I was the editor of CyberAtlas in the late 90s. Back then, the workplace shopping phenomena was attributed to people being more likely to have high-speed connections at work. Nielsen-NetRatings attributes the rise in online shoppers from home on Friday to gas prices. I think it's the convenience factor that rules the day. As for how this impacts productivity at work, here's one reasonable take:
    "We actually think it's productive if they do it that way instead of running out to a suburban mall and stretching the one-hour lunch into two," said Bob Dobkin, a spokesman for Pepco, which has 2,500 employees in the area. "We do think it promotes a better employee relationship."
     

    There's a column over at The Register that makes a good case for measuring the ROI of wireless and remote access technology, something far too many companies apparently aren't doing. But the piece also raises another important, larger point, about the most effective way to introduce technology changes in the enterprise. The bottom line is to get user buy-in. The IT guy can't just show up one day and say, "Here. You're going to use this from now on." Enterprises need to include employees in the decision-making process when considering new technology. After all, you want to give them a tool they can use, and the best way to determine that is to ask them.
    Users are looking to cut out tedious paperwork, reduce unnecessary commuting, and get some more control over their own time. ...Something that supports them along this path will encourage them to be more productive. If it is a solution they buy into, so much the better.
    So much the better for their attitude and performance, and for your bottom line.
     

    I'm hard at work on my presentation for next month's enterprise security Webcasts, but my mind has been wandering to holiday shopping thoughts. So goes Getaway Day. XBox 360 launched yesterday, as I'm sure you know. There has been much talk about whether or not the shortage of gaming consoles was a stunt to drive demand and create buzz. I don't see the common sense of having a shortage of the hot holiday product. It doesn't seem Microsoft would benefit. Then again, if people were able to place pre-orders months ago, how does something like this happen?
    In short, the Saugus Best Buy north of Boston looks like a bomb went off. You can see where the chaos went down last night. There's accessory racks that look like they were hit by one of those "grab as much as you can in 60 seconds" shopping cart gimmicks. The Xbox 360s were, of course, long gone. There were plenty of parents at Best Buy, a notable contrast to Circuit City, which was younger in orientation. The parents were leaving the store with sad looks on their faces. This is because one employee actually said that they do not expect to receive another major shipment of Xbox 360s until February of 2006.
    That's from Ken "Caesar" Fisher's first-person account. The shortage does seem to be driving up prices on eBay, where one enterprising eBay seller (and aren't they all, really?) included a copy of USA Today to prove the console was in hand. Does that say $1,625? Looks like someone was going to be the only member of their World of Warcraft guild without one. comScore says online shopping will hit $19 billion during the November through December holiday season, representing 24 percent growth over the 2004 season. So much for fraud concerns turning people off to Internet shopping. comScore credits in-store pick-up, free shipping, and easy returns for enticing consumers. Have a safe and happy holiday, and for our international readers, enjoy your weekend.
     

    If you haven't seen it already, Jack Shafer's piece in Slate that chronicles the downfall of Google is the kind of read that makes you think twice about a $400 stock. Sure, it hasn't happened yet. But a couple of weeks ago I told you about Stephen Walli's theory on the downfall of Microsoft, and I'm an equally opportunity doomsayer. I didn't agree with Walli on Microsoft, and what really frightens me about Shafer's Google prognostication isn't the potential for Google to die. Companies die all the time. Shafer lists some bygone tech companies right atop his piece. It's the thought of big media companies gaining so much control over certain aspects of the Internet that they shut out the other players. In this scenario, Rupert Murdoch builds an empire of classifieds (both online and offline) so large that it can bar search engines like Google from playing the game. It's basically his own version of the Web open to whomever he invites. Fair and balanced, of course.
     

    I want to return to the Pew Internet survey I posted about yesterday. Buried in the "Further Analysis" section of the nine-page report is some interesting demographic data about search engine use:
    On a typical day these are the percentages of internet users in each generation who use search engines: GenY (ages 18-28) -- 42% GenX (ages 29-40) -- 51% Younger Baby Boomers (ages 41-50) -- 37% Older Baby Boomers (ages 51-59) -- 39% Matures (ages 60-69) -- 31% After work (ages 70+) -- 25%
    While it's no shock that GenXers lead all other generations in daily search engine use, I am somewhat surprised their percentage is that low. Then again, I'm in the information business and use search constantly (my personal home page is Google News), so in that regard I'm probably an atypical user. It's also intriguing that Older Baby Boomers edge out Younger Baby Boomers in terms of daily search engine use. It's the only exception to a downhill pattern as you move from GenX through the older generations. And it can't be explained by income (older Boomers have more money) because Pew's survey sample comes from people who already are connected, not both the haves and have-nots.
     

    I'm not one one of those guys that really gets into cars, so you're not going to find me hanging around blogs that cover the automotive industry. I was, however, fully aware of yesterday's news out of General Motors of plant closings and 30,000 layoffs. It seems the only reason the automobile business isn't the worst sector in the United States is because there's an airline business. We've touched on corporate blogging in this forum before, and like many well-known brands, GM has blogs. One GM blog in particular has been the center of discussion today. It's called FastLane and it has always focused squarely on GM's vehicles. So what's a corporate blogger to do? Can one realistically expect not to mention the news of tens of thousands of layoffs that made headlines everywhere and captured even my interest? Dave Taylor addresses the issue on his Intuitive Life Business Blog:
    The basic dilemma that faces Bob Lutz and the rest of the blogging team at General Motors: is their target audience investors and business people interested in General Motors the company, or is their audience car afficionados, enthusiasts who want to talk about torque, engine block design and tire traction?
    I'm not sure that a company, GM in this case, can blog about its products and ignore the ongoing chaos within the company. Listening to the radio yesterday on my way home I heard a sound bite from an automotive industry analyst. He said that GM's biggest problem is that its cars got boring (or at least were perceived as such by consumers, not that there's a big difference). GM was doing fine selling trucks and SUVs, but then gas prices went up and suddenly those weren't so popular. If FastLane is about the vehicles, then how they are going to improve the vehicles, and why they have to do it, should be fair game. The big takeaway is that before you launch a corporate blog you need a plan for dealing with bad news. Thanks to Shel Holtz for shedding light on this.
     

    Smithsonian Magazine is getting in on the innovation discussion this month. Don Dodge and I have been talking about the difference between inventors and innovators over the past few weeks, prompted as such by our interest in Fortune's Business Innovation blog. Smithsonian lists 35 top innovators of our time. Being an IT Management blog, readers will be interested in Bill Gates (profiled by Jimmy Carter of all people) and Tim Berners-Lee ("First he wrote the code for the World Wide Web. Then he gave it away."). Beyond the geeks, however, Smithsonian lists familiar names you might not have considered, such as Steven Speilberg, architect Frank Gehry, and jazz musician Wynton Marsalis, as well as several names you probably didn't know.
    They are a varied lot, reflecting the diversity of America and the wide-ranging interests of Smithsonian. They come to us from Civil War battlefields and the African bush, from the ravaged streets of New Orleans and the mountain observatories of California, from the Broadway stage and the Amazonian forest, from the corporate boardroom and the forensic laboratory. They sing arias. They scrutinize ants. They create memorable movies and singular buildings. They work magic with the instruments of their choosingtrumpets, cellos, cameras, paintbrushes, laptops and imagination. One sits awake writing poetry in the wee hours; another sorts through old bones to shed light on the advent of humans in North America; another has spent his professional life deep in the ocean, pursuing an elusive monster he has yet to find alive.
     

    I haven't done an official study, but I would estimate that 95 percent of the email I get is useless. I'm not an anti-email crank. I know it's an essential communications tool, and I conduct important business with it. But checking my email now is like having to weed my garden every time I step out the front door. It's my least enjoyable online activity. My favorite is using search engines, because it's productive, proactive and provides a high success rate. Millions of other people feel the same way, and that's why search soon will challenge email as the top online activity among Americans. According to the latest Pew Internet & American Life tracking survey:
    ...the number of (Americans) using search engines on an average day jumped from roughly 38 million in June 2004 to about 59 million in September 2005  an increase of about 55%.
    Which means that on a typical day, 63 percent of the 94 million American adults who use the Internet will put a search engine to work. That trails only using email (77 percent) as a daily Internet activity. Other popular online activities include: Getting news -- 46 percent Job-related research -- 29 percent Instant messaging -- 18 percent Online banking -- 18 percent Chat rooms -- 8 percent Reading blogs -- 3 percent (seems low to me) Online auctions -- 3 percent
     

    There has been a resurgence of interest in "business continuity" since Hurricane Katrina. But a new survey shows that, in too many cases, that interest isn't being translated into action in the enterprise. The survey, by Beacon Technology Partners, reveals that one of three Fortune 1000 C-level executives "don't expect their companies to increase IT spending on business continuity measures," as this IT World Canada story explains. And yet:
    ...an overwhelming majority  88 percent  claims business continuity is a big concern.
    Why the disconnect? Money. Nearly three-quarters of the execs surveyed were leery of the extra costs associated with a back-up data center. Which I guess makes sense, since the vast majority of companies never have a network disruption -- oops, actually the survey reports that 61.5 percent of respondents said their company did sustain a service disruption in the past year. Too many of you C-level types are rolling the dice.
     

    Can a serial entrepreneur take freely available open source software, put it in a box, and sell it for less than proprietary software? We're about to find out. CompareSoft is another idea from Michael Robertson, who brought us MP3.com back in the day. Michael tells the story on his site, including the details of an unscientific study that found that if you approach the average people in a shopping mall and ask them, they don't know what open source software is. To enlighten these deprived souls, CompareSoft is going to take its own version of Open Office, the GIMP photo editing program, and other open source applications, and put them on CDs and in nice boxes. What the mall shoppers weren't asked, as far as I can tell, is if they were looking for alternatives to the proprietary software they use. If they were, they probably know Open Office could be had for free. If they're happy with Microsoft Office, it's because it does the job, it's easy to use, and (while it is kind of pricey if you buy it alone) it most likely came on their sub-$1,000 PC when they bought it. As for GIMP... If you really want to know why GIMP isn't a household name, let me tell you about my aunt with nine grandchildren who lives to take pictures of these kids. She's computer literate to the level of most people who don't work in tech, but put a user manual like the one on the GIMP site in front of her, and it might as well be in Swahili. Somehow she makes do with the software that ships with digital cameras, photo printers, and every other technology device these days now that I think about it. Open source doesn't play outside the tech world because no one cares. It's that simple.
     

    I wonder what percentage of Apple's iPod sales are in the New York area. As I was telling a friend this weekend, the messages and placards on the metro New York public transportation system (which I take to work most days) ask riders to be alert for, among other things, wires coming from clothes. As winter approaches, at least half of the people on the average train have wires protruding from their jackets. They're from the iPods in their pockets. Pauline Millard wrote last week how New Yorkers can turn a simple piece of technology into a fetish, and the iPod is the latest example.
    These little plastic cases that cost hundreds of dollars have become a necessary accessory. Nowadays almost everyone has one slung around his or her neck. Apple has found a way to make people not just want their products, but need their products. Sure, you could listen to your tunes on a CD player, but then you won't have the little white player, nestled in your coat pocket, giving even the most grizzled old man instant street cred.
    Clearly, Apple's iPod has become a cultural icon in a way that marketers only dream about, and have very little control over in my opinion. iPod mania has taken on a life of its own. Rags Gupta says The Sharper Image holiday catalog had 17 pages of iPod accessories this season, and more than a dozen car companies will be integrating iPods in the near future. Two things make New York, in particular, the perfect place for the iPod to achieve cult status.
    1. Radio in the New York area (I'm betting this is true of most places) is beyond terrible. It has a long to way to go before it can improve to being unlistenable. New York, the largest radio market in the nation, will be without a rock station after Howard Stern leaves K-Rock and the format changes in the coming months.
    2. Almost no one has car. Being a dweller of the suburbs, I would never have bought a portable music player if I didn't take public transportation because you can't drive and use headphones.
    If Apple's marketing people turned these observations into an extra effort in places like New York, then they know what they're doing. Thanks to Dominic at the Corante New York blog for the link.
     

    Earlier this week I wrote about how difficult it is for IT pros to get their enterprise users to employ basic computer security measures. A couple of researchers at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business think you could use some more support from software providers. Assistant professor Tunay Tunca and Ph.D. candidate Terrence August tried out several mathematical models to determine the best ways for software vendors to persuade users to apply patches. As described here:
    ...what does not work is mandating patching as a part of a user contract agreement or having the government apply special taxes to software likely to experience vulnerabilities. Both options turn off users  and turn them away from a vendors software.
    While the researchers found that rebate offers on future purchases provide some incentive for customers to use patches:
    ...the best and most practical approach...is simply for the company to spend the resources necessary to make their patches more easy to use and reliable.
    So, software vendors, go do that.
     

    No, alliteration is not among them. However, CIO Update guest columnist Dan Gingras fills us in here on the half-dozen attributes a CEO should look for in hiring a new chief information officer. First, though, Dan says CEOs "need to decide whether the person who heads (their) IT department is truly strategic to the organization."
    If, in the final analysis, you dont think its strategic, then stop reading and pass this to the CFO or the head of HR to find a really good VP of IT or director of IT.
    (My 2 cents: If you're recruited for a CIO gig by an HR person or a CFO, don't take the job because the CEO will never listen to you.) Assuming you do consider the CIO's role strategic, here's what Dan says to look for:
    Passion
    Appetite for Change
    Business Knowledge vs. Domain Knowledge
    Exceptional Communications Skills
    Thirst for Knowledge
    Leadership
    Regarding that last one, Dan says, "If there is a single trait that defines the role of the CIO, this is it. Its also one of the hardest to recognize and to find." Hey, I didn't say it would be easy.
     

    You can't do what I do for a living without paying attention to trends in the advertising and media markets. These are interesting times indeed. There's talk of advertising-supported software applications again; an idea that went over like a rootkit on a music CD back in the late 90s. Microsoft is chasing Google all over the place for advertising dollars to accompany search results. Advertising, of course, existed long before the Internet. And the news from the "old media" is ugly. David Card today told of a 21 percent decline in advertising revenue among ABC, CBS, and NBC in the third quarter. There's a good Q&A today in the Hartford Courant (free registration may be required) on what's wrong with the newspaper industry.
    More companies are increasingly looking to the Internet to spend their money, and advertisers are concerned that overall newspaper circulation has been declining steadily since 1988.
    More than 1,900 newspaper jobs were lost this year, and Editor & Publisher says that's a conservative estimate. Meanwhile, back on the Internet, advertising is making its way into RSS. Questions on all of this that relate to tech:
    • How many of those out-of-work journalists would be willing to take a job at a company like Yahoo! that's adding more original content to its pages?
    • If Microsoft Office is installed on nearly every PC out of the box, what would the point of an online ad-supported version be?
    • I keep hearing that Google will be placing some of its clients' ads in newspapers. Will there be enough to impact newspaper ad revenue?
    • To echo a question Henry Blodget asked earlier in the week: Who clicks on search ads? (He got answers.)
    • Jeff Zucker, the president of NBC, says TV ratings for NBC Nightly News improved after NBC started offering the daily newscasts on its Web site. What's the correlation there?
     

    Robert X. Cringely seems to think he knows what Google is doing buying up fiber like it's scotch on the eve of Prohibition. Cringely says ISPs are lousy businesses, and that's not what Google is after.
    Two years ago Google had one data center. Today they are reported to have 64. Two years from now, they will have 300-plus. The advantage to having so many data centers goes beyond simple redundancy and fault tolerance. They get Google closer to users, reducing latency. They offer inter-datacenter communication and load-balancing using that no-longer-dark fiber Google owns. But most especially, they offer super-high bandwidth connections at all peering ISPs at little or no incremental cost to Google.
    There's plenty more in the article about Google building an Internet on top of the Internet. Cringely says he'll have more next week. Can't wait. Thanks to Don Dodge (a Microsoft guy) for the link.
     

    I've been paying attention to the evolving world of collaboration for much of the year, and there's plenty to read about this week. BusinessWeek informs us this week that E-Mail is So Five Minutes Ago. Included in the story is a look at the implementation of wikis by European-based investment bank Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein. Though the story doesn't make a mention, they use SocialText wikis. Dresdner is the oft-cited example of companies leading the charge toward wikis to replace everything from e-mail to intranets. Gartner Group predicts that wikis will become mainstream collaboration tools in at least 50 percent of companies by 2009, BusinessWeek says. The lead of the BW story also seems to be testing out a new matchmaking service for the busy, unattached professional. Not sure what that's about. Ross Mayfield, who leads the aforementioned SocialText, has a link today to Dave Pollard's post about wikis as tools for democratization of business.
    The biggest cultural barrier to wikis is also their greatest potential value and power — they engender shared trust and shared responsibility by offering participants unrestricted collective ownership of all content; the space and the collective knowledge in it belongs to 'us' (the participants, jointly) not to 'them' (the company).
    Last but not least, in his review of Google's new Google Base database application, John Blossom of Shore Communications looks at who should be concerned down the road:
    Consider this a shot not only at eBay, Craigslist and other more traditional databases but as well a poke at wikis and other simple database tools which do not have the ease of use, sorting and and data formation offered by Google Base.
    Say this about Google: once they get involved, things always get interesting.
     

    I've seen pointless political grandstanding in my day, but this one approaches art. One day after the United Nations reluctantly, but clearly, agreed to let the United States retain control over the Internet, the U.S. Congress has boldly proclaimed that the U.S. intends to retain control over the Internet! I'm glad we got that straightened out.
     

    If there's one truth that journalists, security vendors and politicians have learned, it's that fear sells. Scare people enough and they just might read your publication, buy your product or re-elect you. (Having said that, I can state unequivocally that cheap fear-mongering has no place on the IT Management blog. That's what eSecurity Planet is for.) The latest scare campaign involved Internet telephony, or Voice over IP (VoIP). Many vendors and analysts are warning enterprises away from VoIP, particularly the increasingly popular Skype:
    Researchers said if an unpatched version (of Skype) is sitting inside the corporate network, and malware writers capitalize on that, it could create problems for IT managers that don't even know the application is behind the firewall.
    Well, Enterprise Networking Planet columnist Paul Rubens isn't having it. In a column published last week, Rubens takes the tech industry to task for "over-hyping threats." The problem with being afraid of your own enterprise shadow, Rubens argues, is that "you may never implement technology which otherwise would have given your organization a significant competitive advantage." He singles out recent scare stories about spam over Internet telephony, or SPIT. If some industry Chicken Littles are to be believed, Rubens says, "VoIP will soon be overwhelmed by spam calls clogging up networks and voice mailboxes." But a Gartner Group research director interviewed by Rubens provides a reality check:
    Not only is it too expensive to send voice messages around the world using VoIP, due to termination charges when connecting to the PSTN, but more the point, voice as a spam medium just doesn't work. You can click on a link in a spam email if you are foolish enough to want to buy fake Viagra or take out a loan from a spammer, but who's going to make a call?
    Hopefully, nobody your company hired.
     

    It's getting cold here in the Northeast, which means (for me anyway) less outdoor activity and more time for things like reading. I always ask for a couple of books for Christmas to help get me through the winter. Fellow Jupitermedian Pedro Hernandez, who manages Enterprise IT Planet, sent me a press release yesterday for a book by Peter Schutz, who once led Porsche AG. The book is called The Driving Force: Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People, and I'm going to pick a few pieces of advice from the release:
    • Remove the glass panes between people
    • Four of the most powerful words in the world are "I need your help"
    • Pursue excellence, not success
    • Build credibility
    • Don't give your customers what they say they want. Instead, redefine customer expectations
    To expand on that last point, Schutz says:
    You cannot do good proactive marketing or new product development by listening to your customers. There was no customer demand for the transducer, the airplane, the automobile, the microwave oven, the Internet. No one asked Steve Jobs to invent the personal computer. You must use your imagination and vision to decide what customer expectations are likely to be after change has occurred.
    Also on the book front, Susan Visser, who is the IBM Press Program Manager for Information Management, is putting together a list of the best tech books of the year. She's looking for books that were well-written, helpful, and worth the money. If you've read one, let her know in the comments section of her blog. If you think you've found a gap in the tech book world; that is, you're looking for a book a on a certain topic and haven't been able to find one, let Susan know about that too. She's planning books to be published in 2006. Thanks to Bill Higgins for the link.
     

    An article in CMO Magazine says that a strong relationship between the CMO and the CIO may provide the keys to competitive advantage. CMO stands for Chief Marketing Officer, by the way. Geeks aren't the only ones with lingo. An increasing number of marketing campaigns take the Internet and technology into account, so having your CMO and CIO on the same page will only aid your organization.
    What both sides need to realize is that they enable each other's success, says Scott Davis, senior partner of marketing consultancy Prophet. "Few marketing imperatives can be met without the capabilities and insights of IT," he says. "And IT is only as adept as its grasp of the customer requirements."
    Some of the most effective types of marketing — word of mouth, RSS feeds, blogs, and Web sites to name a few — rely on cooperation between IT and marketing, and can provide amazing ROI if done properly. Web sites go beyond simple brochureware and e-commerce these days. I've been catching up on the first season of Lost on DVD this week (I know, late to the game). Few shows on TV have as much buzz as Lost. There's even a Web site devoted to Oceanic Airlines, the fictional airline in the show. Little touches like that can go far. The same goes for blogs. Niall Kennedy is doing a demonstration product blog for iRobot's Scooba wood floor cleaning robot. He shows, among other things, how a blog can be used to explain an issue like the product not shipping in time for the holidays. ClickZ has an article today on pop-up blogs, a rather poorly named concept for temporary blogs that accompany an event or product launch. The Fortune Business Innovation blog I've been reading is one example. Have you had lunch with your CMO lately?
     

    Some day, I believe, you will be able to tap into a public wireless network and receive spam almost anywhere in the U.S. That day, for good and bad, may be coming soon. ABI Research study forecasts a 10-fold increase in the number of "mesh networks" for wireless mega-deployments over the next five years. In a study released Wednesday, ABI predicted most of the new mesh projects will involve citywide wireless networks, with corporations and universities also launching deployments. Most of the new deployments will come from "alternative service providers such as Earthlink," according to ABI senior analyst Sam Lucero. Networking equipment giant Cisco Systems gave mesh's future a boost this week with the release of wireless mesh networking products. Said Lucero (in a statement):
    "Cisco may be able to jumpstart the campus-scale wireless mesh networking market in a way that its competitors have largely been unable to do to date."
    Technology's playas have a way of doing that.
     

    Lacking any real leverage, the European Union and other countries have failed in their bid to wrest control of the Internet's domain name system from the United States, which I've written about here and here. At the United Nations World Summit on the Information Society in Tunisia, negotiators agreed to let the U.S. retain authority over the Internet in return for...nothing, really. Sure, the parties decided, as this Associated Press story says, to "create an open-ended international forum for raising important Internet issues." Ooh, that sounds significant! Oh, wait a minute: "The forum, however, would have no binding authority." In a face-saving (or delusional) statement, the European Union said the agreement would result in "further internationalization of Internet governance, and enhanced intergovernmental cooperation to this end." According to one EU delegate:
    "In the short term, U.S. oversight is not immediately challenged, but in the long term they are under the obligation to negotiate with all the states about the future and evolution of Internet governance."
    I bet they are. U.S. Ambassador David Gross, head of the U.S. delegation, had the proper perspective on the deal:
    "No oversight mechanisms were established by anyone over anyone. There was also no change in the U.S. government's role in relation to the Internet, and no mechanism for such a change was created. It was a clean sweep, I'd say."
    No argument here.
     

    File this one under good ideas for a perfect world. John Murray, writing at IT Manager's Journal, makes the case for scheduling project breaks into IT projects.
    The concept is to allocate a portion of the total project time to an in-depth analysis of the status of the project midway through the development process. The focus of the analysis is to consider each project component in order to identify areas that require attention. In other words, you shut down the entire project for a given period to provide an opportunity to step back and take a hard, candid look at its status, identify existing project hurdles, and devise a plan to overcome them. Completely stopping a project forces everyone involved to concentrate on the necessary corrections, as opposed to the usual process, which is to simply drive the project, with all its problems, to completion.
    He's right when he says his proposal requires no expenditure for new technology and is applicable regardless of the size of the organization. But he's also right when he says:
    I can hear a chorus of objections. "Stopping the project will only delay it. Doing what you suggest adds additional expense to the project. Senior management will never support such an idea. Opening up a discussion of the project status will only encourage the members of the participating departments to push for additional functionality, which will only expand the scope of the project."
    I'm going to guess that a lot of organizations that tried to schedule breaks into their IT projects would end up eliminating the breaks as soon as the project fell behind schedule. After all, even Murray admits scheduling breaks will add expense and lengthen projects. Organizations that can pull this off probably deserve consideration as one of the best places to work in IT.
     

    When Computerworld's annual IT salary survey found only modest raises across the board for IT workers for the fourth year in a row, it probably set off a large groan. But are raises all that make a good job? What about benefits? As Ian Lamont noted earlier this week:
    Of course, regular, above-average raises must make people happy about the companies they work for, unless there are other underlying reasons for dissatisfaction — depression, poor working conditions, 90-hour workweeks. But other factors figure in as well. Obvious ones include generous non-salary benefits, chances for career advancement, and confidence in management.
    With that in mind, Computerworld is accepting nominations for the best places to work in IT. You can nominate your organization, or the organization of the that friend of whom you are always jealous at http://www.rresults.com/n062914/index.cgi?s=O. You can also read about last year's winners on the Computerworld site.
     

    Spend two minutes talking to IT pros about their greatest workplace frustrations, and you're likely to hear more grumbling about people than technology. That's because IT pros usually can solve any technological challenges thrown their way. It's the idiots in the workplace human element that constantly undermines their efforts to maintain a secure, well-run enterprise and a modicum of mental health. In a thought-provoking column on eSecurity Planet, network security analyst Linda LeBlanc agrees that "our end users have no clue." But, she adds, "that's our fault."
    If we don't teach the people we're responsible for to take care of themselves -- just a little bit -- we are going to continue spending the majority of our time cleaning up perfectly preventable computing tragedies.
    I know where Linda's coming from: Many IT pros prefer to work with technology than humans, and thus don't always communicate with enterprise users on a regular basis. And some are virtually invisible until they parachute in to solve a crisis. The sad truth, however, is that some users are just beyond hope. I'll ballpark the number at 20 percent, though some IT workers will say it's more than half. These are the users who never will grasp the concept of email and IM viruses, data backup, etc. One IT manager wrote in response to Linda's column:
    Some of my users are dangerous because they do not believe that most security rules apply to them. I have come to the point where I have to lock them down as tight as possible to prevent them from hurting themselves. I send out daily emails explaining the threats with example from real articles. They refer to me as the IT Nazi. It's like working with 40 adults with ADD when it comes to security.
    While Linda doesn't offer any magic solutions (there aren't any), she suggests focusing on three messages and pounding them home to users:
    1. Don't EVER open email that could be spam (no matter how much you desire to be wealthy/popular/well-endowed/refinanced). 2. Back up data religiously (whatever your spiritual beliefs). 3. Turn on auto-update. (Yes, that means you.)
     

    Google may not be a pioneer, but it's better to be a settler. Last week I mentioned I've been reading the Business Innovation 2005 blog, which goes along with the Fortune Innovation Forum going on later this month. Today, it led me to the blog for Innosight and its discussion of the Google innovation culture. In the comments to that blog post, and in the comments to the BusinessWeek article that inspired it, people question whether or not Google is an innovator. After all, they say, Google didn't invent search, toolbars, blogs, Web analytics, or any other of the Web-based business ideas the company has brought to market. There's a difference between an innovator and an inventor. If you don't believe me, check out the dictionary. Inventors make up something completely new. Innovators introduce things as if they're new. Robert Fulton did not invest the steamship, as many believe. But he was the first to put it into regular passenger service. Fulton's name would go on to become synonymous with steamship service the way "Google" has become a verb for search. If you're interested in learning more about famous innovators, I can personally recommend the book They Made America: Two Centuries of Innovators from the Steam Engine to the Search Engine (since I've read it). At the end of the book, which is written like a timeline, you'll find the founders of Google. Innovators don't have to invent; they just have to act like they did.
     

    JupiterResearcher Gary Stein and PR blogger Steve Rubel have been blogging about ways to use blogs and search engines to track the buzz (or lack thereof) surrounding your company, your brand, or your products online. Last week, I mentioned IBM's Public Image Monitoring Solution, which is a more complicated and costly solution that employs text analytics and semantic search technology. Rubel, who wrote about what he calls "The Conversation Gap" back in October, uses the results of his technique to show marketers that they can join the conversation with a blog.
    The concept is simple, yet it makes an important point. I try to show the communication/brand manager their share of the online conversation. I talk about the gap that exists between the number of conversations that are just about their category and the ones that are about their brand AND the category. This illustrates the gap they can narrow by getting more involved in the dialogue by having a blog.
    Stein further developed the concept by introducing what he calls "Equity Share" — the topics mentioned most frequently by people posting about a particular brand.
     

    He's the billionaire the right wing loves to hate. But along with "socialist," "shylock" and "threat to democracy," conservatives owning stock in several major Internet and technology companies now have a new term of endearment for Hungarian emigre and international financier George Soros -- fellow shareholder. An investment fund controlled by Soros on Monday revealed previously undisclosed positions in Amazon.com, eBay, Microsoft and Intel. The good news for tech investors is that Soros Fund Management LLC holds "long positions" in these companies, meaning it expects shares to increase in value. Soros largely made his reputation betting "short" on many companies and even entire currencies -- well, that and being as one with Satan. In fact, given some theories about Bill Gates, the next Microsoft shareholders' meeting could be wickedly confusing.
     

    A new survey by the European Union shows that age, education and income are key indicators of likely Internet use. The survey results mirror those from a U.S. Census Bureau story I posted about a few weeks ago. As in the U.S., Internet usage in the 25-nation EU is far more prevalent among younger people than older, with 85 percent of respondents 16 to 24 years old using the Internet, while only 13 percent of those aged 55 to 74 online. Only one-quarter of those without any secondary education use the Internet, compared to 77 percent of EU's college and university graduates. The U.S. Census Department study revealed similar correlations, with the highest level of Internet usage -- 92.2 percent -- coming from households with incomes of $100,000 or more and the lowest level (20.2 percent) reported by Americans who haven't graduated from high school. What amazes me about the European study is that average Internet usage across the EU is 47 percent, well below the 54.7 percent of U.S. households hooked up to the 'Net. Indeed, the overall EU percentage for Internet usage ranks below all but six U.S. states. And the EU wants to control the Internet? I don't think so, buster.
     

    You'll need more than your technical aptitude to survive in IT in the coming years. I actually found this research among the Gartner press releases while researching my previous post on Windows Vista. I think it's worth sharing, and I can write a blog post without mentioning Microsoft. (By the way, Scoble is trying this too. Only they are the ones paying him.) Back to Gartner:
    Scepticism toward the effectiveness of IT, the rise of IT automation, worldwide geographic labour shifts and multi-sourcing will lead to the emergence of a new breed of IT professional, the "versatilist", who will have technical aptitude, local knowledge, knowledge of industry processes and leadership ability.
    The "versatilist" is further defined by Diane Morello, vice president of research at Gartner.
    Versalitists are people whose numerous roles, assignments and experiences are enabling them to synthesize knowledge and context to fuel business value. Versatilists are applying their depth of skills and experiences to a rich scope of situations and challenges and implementing their cross-organisational insight to flesh out teams and fill competency gaps.
    By 2010, Gartner says, traditional IT will splinter into four distinct domains, and it's up to IT professionals to decide if they want to develop the expertise and experiences to help them fit into one of the four domains.
    • Technology infrastructure and services
    • Information design and management
    • Process design and management
    • Relationship and sourcing management
    Here's the full release on the research from Gartner.
     

    With word coming from Gartner that most organizations could safely ignore Windows Vista until 2008, look for Microsoft's faithful to spread the word about why that's not such a good idea. Mayur Kamat thought about it for 15 minutes then devised a list of seven reasons you shouldn't wait until 2008. Because his blog uses the white text on a black background that burns the retinas, I'll list the seven reasons. If you want the details, wear shades.
    1. Security
    2. User experience
    3. Information organization and retrieval
    4. Performance
    5. New application platform
    6. Games
    7. IE 7.0
    Gartner made a similar proclamation about Office 12, which I wrote about back in September. With Office, Gartner advised clients to think of their business. If their business wasn't suffering from using their current version of Office, then there was no rush. So it's safe to say Gartner doesn't care that Vista's 3-D chess is awesome. Over at eWeek, meanwhile, Jason Brooks writes about he would re-make Windows his way if they were willing (can you imagine?) to let him play with the source code. Among other things, he wants more play for the command line. Yeah, that's what the world needs; more C: prompt. Thanks to the Seattle P-I's Microsoft blog for the links.
     

    Yesterday's news in the ongoing saga of Sony's rootkit/DRM disaster was that a trojan had been discovered that exploited the software. Today, Sony said it would stop, at least temporarily, using the software on CDs. The Washington Post's Security Fix blog today reports on comments by Stewart Baker, recently appointed by President Bush as the Department of Homeland Security's assistant secretary for policy.
    "There's been a lot of publicity recently about tactics used in pursuing protection for music and DVD CDs in which questions have been raised about whether the protection measures install hidden files on peoples' computers that even the system administrators can't find."
    You'll recall that earlier this week I talked about the dangers that home computers can pose to corporate networks if they aren't protected. Baker made an interesting point that I hadn't thought about. Those home computers could be vital to keeping the economy going if a flu pandemic were to appear. Baker warned companies like Sony not to undermine the security measures computer users have taken.
    "If we have an avian flu outbreak here and it is even half as bad as the 1918 flu epidemic, we will be enormously dependent on being able to get remote access for a large number of people, and keeping the infrastructure functioning is a matter of life and death and we take it very seriously."
    CNET has an FAQ on the rootkit and how to deal with it.
     

    OK, no one has said that yet, but I wonder if it's where the debate is headed after an SAP executive used the dreaded "s" word in condemning open source software and its allegedly inhibiting effects on innovation. "Intellectual property (IP) socialism is the worst that can happen to any IP-based society," Shai Agassi, president of the product and technology group at SAP, said this week during a speech in California. Agassi also said SAP won't use open source for its software because doing so would eliminate any incentive to innovate. Earlier this year Microsoft founder Bill Gates likened free software developers to communists "who want to get rid of the incentive for musicians and moviemakers and software makers under various guises. They don't think that those incentives should exist." No doubt there's an "everything should be free" crowd out there spouting nonsense. But Agassi and Gates are painting with a broad brush, and -- call me comrade -- I don't think using "hot button" words such as commie and socialist is particularly helpful or enlightening.
     

    The end of the year can be a stressful time at work. Our social calendars pick up with the holidays approaching, there are project and budget deadlines, employee reviews, vacation time, and any number of distractions. It's also prime time for employee burnout to show its face. We published an article by P.G. Daly on Intranet Journal this week called Eliminating Employee Burnout in IT. Why is it important to fight burnout?
    A little effort spent eliminating burnout will go a long way towards making your employees (and yourself) happier and healthier while laying the foundation for an environment that fosters innovation and creativity in a way that impacts your organization's bottom line. Attracting and retaining employees is cheaper than replacing them and with the skyrocketing costs of healthcare, you can't afford not to heed the warning signs of burnout.
    The article includes a short quiz to determine if burnout has already set in.
     

    Take a look at the screenshot below, and you'll see that Windows Vista, the operating system formerly known as Longhorn, has a pretty radical new look. This is something Microsoft hasn't sprung on us since Windows 95. vista.jpg Thanks to browser-based applications, some developers won't have to go crazy adjusting their UIs to the new Vista look. If you're designing UIs, however, there's quite a bit you need to know. It's summarized in an article over at Developer.com by Mike Gunderloy called Everything You Know About UI Design is Wrong.

    We've been awaiting the release of Vista (mostly under its "Longhorn" code name) for years now. That long wait has lulled many developers into a sense of having all the time in the world to get their applications ready for the new platform. Well, it's time to wake up and start gulping the coffee. After years of delay, it looks like Microsoft is pretty well on track to release this beast within the next year. There are plenty of test versions floating around, and the APIs are largely settled down.

    Microsoft says it's still on track to ship in the second half of 2006, but the news today over at WindowsITPro is that Vista beta 2 will be delayed by a month or two. Microsoft will make up the time by eliminating a later release candidate milestone. But don't use that as an excuse to procrastinate.

     

    Internet monitoring software vendors provide a valuable sociological service by chronicling the many ways people waste time on the job. This is done through vendor surveys of employees' work habits and are intended (as Techdirt sarcastically points out) to stoke fear in prospective customers that office misuse of the Internet and email are 1) wasting time and money and 2) creating potentially disastrous security and compliance issues. The latest such survey comes from "email forensic compliance" system provider Cryoserver, which concludes that "more than 90% of employees use work email to organise their social life and send jokes." All well and good, but I want details. London-based Cryoserver supplies them, listing the top 10 non-work related uses of email on the job:
    1. Discussed/organised social life or weekend plans - 98%
    2. Jokes/humorous emails - 90%
    3. Discussed/organised holiday plans - 78%
    4. Conducted non-work related business - 76%
    5. Organised birthday parties/stag nights etc. - 74%
    6. Discussed dinner plans - 70%
    7. Discussed relationships/love life or other personal issues - 64%
    8. Discussed or gossiped about colleagues - 56%
    9. Discussed news and current affairs - 56%
    10. Discussed local restaurants/pubs - 50%
    The flaw in the survey is it doesn't indicate how much time is spent on these activities. Let's say just once in the past year you used email to organize a "stag night." Does that put you in the 74% group under No. 5? It's hard to tell. I was surprised that discussion of relationships (No. 7, 64%) and gossiping about colleagues (No. 8, 56%) via email isn't more common. Perhaps workers suspect their employers are using Croyoserver (or similar) software to spy on them. Here's another "your employees are ripping you off!" survey, this one from compensation data and software provider Salary.com. I remember leaving a phone message for the PR person back in July to get more information on the "top time-wasting activities" of workers, but never heard back from the guy. Screwing off on the job, no doubt.
     

    Reading Mike Pastore's observation in the post below about security -- "You can lock down the enterprise pretty tight, but it's those home users that can get you" -- reminds me of a story from last week that may have been overlooked by some IT professionals thinking it didn't relate to them. BusinessWeek has a good write-up on what it calls the "most pernicious twist yet on Internet securities fraud."
    Online brokerage accounts are being looted by hackers who exploit the weaknesses of investors' computers rather than the firms' systems. It's a new scam, but it's mushrooming. Six months ago, SEC investigators say, such schemes weren't even on their radar screen; now, the agency is knee-deep in them.
    So the cyberthieves are stealing passwords from home computers and then using them to get into the online brokerage firms' systems. In a way the trend can be seen as a testament to enterprise security efforts. Why waste time trying to cracked a fortified network when there are millions of sitting ducks online in homes across the country? The trouble, as Mike says, is that these home users frequently connect remotely to your enterprises as part of their jobs. And often, according to this InfoWorld column, the personal passwords people use are "identical to (their) corporate passwords." Further, home users who commute to an office take their password-risky ways with them, which lends even more weight to the advice here from hacker-turned-security consultant Kevin Mitnick:
    More companies have to think of a defense-in-depth strategy, rather than just protecting the perimeter.
     

    An interesting piece by Roger Grimes in InfoWorld last week talked about a friend of his who seemed to have a bit of an addiction to sniffing networks to see what password and user name information she could find. Putting aside the ethics and legality for a moment, the information gleaned from such activity is useful for the purposes of understanding the state of computer and network security. And that state seems to resemble Somalia. Among the findings:
    • The average number of passwords collected in an overnight hotel stay was 118, if you throw out the 50 percent of connections that used an Ethernet switch and did not broadcast passwords.
    • At a conference, she listened to a Cisco security expert as his laptop broadcast 12 different log-in types and passwords during his presentation
    • Many HTTPS-enabled Web sites did not implement SSL correctly — users' log-in names and passwords were being sent in clear text.
    Here's something I have to include in my upcoming Webcasts on enterprise security:
    Many network administrators conduct password audits on their network, but those audits are often directed at cracking weak password hashes for log-in accounts. If you want to know your true state of security, sniff your remote traffic heading across the Internet or coming across the wire from roaming or home users. If you have to use services or protocols that use plain text passwords, use a VPN tunnel of some type between source and destination.
    You can lock down the enterprise pretty tight, but it's those home users that can get you. Grimes' friend eventually recovered from her addiction, by the way. Thanks to Bruce Schneier for the link.
     

    I don't agree with Stephen Walli's theory that Microsoft won't be trading on the market in 10 years, but you can't say it's not well thought out. After all, dinner is on the line. Here's the theory, in a nutshell. It's not Linux that threatens the dominance of Microsoft. Linux is too complicated. CIOs consider switching to desktop Linux a risk. But Open Office, running on Windows XP (of all things) could cause a big problem for Microsoft. It's well-known that Microsoft relies on Office and Windows as its big money makers. As I mentioned Tuesday in my Intranet Journal story on Microsoft's enterprise content management plan, Microsoft is planning an Office-based ECM solution that will force upgrades to Windows and Office, as well as server purchases to make the whole thing work. The theory continues. Once people understand that Open Office integrates with Windows and existing Office installations, and it's free, people will begin to migrate. This is especially true if they need to buy Vista to run the next Office upgrade.
    Microsoft Office represents a considerable amount of their revenue stream. It won't take many OpenOffice experiments (15%?) to impact that revenue stream. So there will be a down quarter or two and Wall Street will punish Microsoft through its stock price. Microsoft will have to behave differently: they won't be able hire, compensate, and retain staff the same way. They won't be able to execute in the same way.
    I think it's an interesting theory because when people have talked about a possible Microsoft decline it's usually "Linux this and Linux that." This idea focuses not only on Office, but Office on Microsoft's own Windows. Thanks to Stephen O'Grady for the link.
     

    The Microsoft memo that has the Internet abuzz today, reminds me of a movie quote.
    You're talking about something you can't get your fingers on, and it's galling you. That's what you're talking about...
    --George Bailey, It's a Wonderful Life
    The leaked memo points out a problem Microsoft has had with the Internet from day one. As Joe Wilcox points out in the Microsoft Monitor today, the Web offers an avenue for people to get information and services and it doesn't matter if those people have Windows. That's what's galling Redmond. But Bill Gates was not alone. Through an odd mix of circumstances, no one really did get their fingers on the Web 15 years ago. In an interesting commentary in the Financial Times last week, James Boyle of the Duke Law School surmised that we couldn't even create the Web we have today if we tried it today. We benefit from an open network and open protocols that deliver information to us whenever we want it. But it could have gone another way.
    The web became hugely popular too quickly to control. The lawyers and policymakers and copyright holders were not there at the time of its conception. What would they have said, had they been? What would a web designed by the World Intellectual Property Organisation or the Disney Corporation have looked like?
    Lawyers slept through the Web's formative years, and for that we're all grateful.
     

    Anyone who writes software code for a living probably looked at Simson Garfinkel's piece in Wired yesterday on History's Worst Software Bugs with a touch of "Glad that wasn't me..." Some of the bugs featured, like the one in the software for radiation treatment at the National Cancer Institute in Panama City, led to people dying (and doctors being indicted for murder). Others, like the bug in the Mariner I space probe in 1962, sent rockets off course and could have killed people. Scott Berkun cites the article as a wake-up call of sorts for software developers. Developers can feel good about themselves for not developing such prominent examples of buggy software, but not because they are better coders. It's because they don't all work on such high-profile programs, he said.
    Learning from the past is not a strong part of the practioner software development culture, and it's a shame, since we repeat the same mistakes again and again. Understanding landmark failures is an integral part of most engineering disciplines (See Petroski's To engineer is human: the role of failure), is not yet part of the software development culture, but it needs to be.
    Scott also has a list of resources to help developers learn from the mistakes of others, and he's willing to accept more resources if you have them. One notable reading suggestion is Robert Charette's Why Software Fails from IEEE's Spectrum magazine.
     

    I'm glad someone is keeping the heat on U.S. Internet and technology companies for caving into repressive regimes around the world in order to protect their business interests. In this case the someone is a group of investors and researchers that is urging tech companies to make a commitment to freedom of expression. Microsoft, Google and Yahoo each have been singled out by human rights groups as cooperating with the efforts of China and other nations to censor or repress speech. Yahoo in particular caused outrage when it cooperated with Chinese investigators to identify a journalist through a Yahoo email address. The reporter, accused of leaking confidential state information, was sentenced to 10 years in prison. As recently as this week, China threatened to shut more than 50 Web sites. And here's another story about China testing software from a U.S. company that would block Skype phone calls over the Internet. Ignore any drivel you hear from these companies about how their noble "long-term involvement in China contributes to the continued modernization of the country," as a Yahoo spokeswoman rationalized yesterday. It's all about the bucks.
     

    When I saw the headline last night about The Webby Awards naming the "Ten Web Moments That Changed the World," I was disappointed I had missed the show because I always like to see what Moby is wearing. Fortunately, they had this year's Webby Awards ceremony in June, and as I recall now, Moby was wearing a sharp kaftan. The list announced on Tuesday is part of the PR blitz celebration leading up to the 10th Annual Webby Awards ceremony in New York next June. That's seven more months of easy blog posts! Anyway, the people who run the Webbys compiled a list of the "10 Web moments that changed the world." Here are the top 10, in dramatic reverse order: 10. Sars Virus Discovered Online, 2003 (don't worry, it gets better) 9. Match.com Booms, 2002 (but not yet) 8. Live 8 on AOL, 2005 (is AOL a Webby sponsor? just asking) 7. Napster Shut Down, 2001 (now we're talking) 6. Depressing 5. Also depressing 4. Elections Worldwide, 2004 (this is a "moment"?) 3. Amazon's Jeff Bezos Named Time Man of the Year, 1999 (see question on No. 8) 2. Drudge Report Breaks Monica Lewinsky Scandal, 1998 (at last, some sex!) 1. And the No. 1 Internet Moment That Changed the World, as decided by The Webby Awards (sponsored by AOL and Amazon.com): The Dotcom Boom and Bust.
     

    Imagine one day the boss comes to you with a proposal. Your organization wants to set up a new office in one of the fastest growing cities in the world, and someone needs to set up and man the IT aspect of it all. It's a multicultural, multiethnic city with a population of about 3 million. The city is full of history. In the old parts of the city, there are bazaars that fill narrow, crooked streets. Businesses from all over the world are seeing the potential and at least thinking about setting up shop. There is a perception that the city is unsafe, and that things are going downhill, but those who have made the trip say it's really not that bad. Despite the traffic jams they attribute to a bustling economy, they say the transportation is even improving. No, it's not Paris. Welcome to Kabul, Afghanistan.
    Karim Khoja, the chief executive of Roshan, Afghanistan's largest cellular company, says he has witnessed the transformation of air transport from scary to reliable. He recalled the time some of his employees were on an Ariana plane that overshot the Kabul airport runway and barreled into an open field riddled with mines. "We were very lucky that no one got killed that day," he said.
    Today's New York Times has the story: Time to Open the Kabul Branch? (you know the drill, free registration, etc.). Thanks to Wikipedia for filling me in on the basics of Kabul.
     

    It's been more than a decade since hacker icon and federal fugitive Kevin Mitnick was arrested by the FBI following a two-year, cross-country chase. After serving five years in prison for wire and computer fraud, Mitnick remade himself as a computer security consultant, author and conference speaker. Following a recent West Coast appearance, Mitnick did an interview with CNET's News.com in which he discussed the current state of software security, modern hackers and Paris Hilton. Did you know that back when Mitnick started hacking, he had to walk five miles in the snow just to breach a firewall? It's true:
    Ten years ago, if you were hacking you had to develop your own scripts. Today is like a point-and-click hacking world. You don't have to know how the engine is working, you just know to get in the car and drive. It is easier.
    Mitnick says security tools have improved over the years, which has prompted an upswing in "social engineering" -- the manipulation of people to get information:
    Social engineering happens quite frequently now. It is growing because security technologies are getting more resilient. The more difficult it is to exploit the technology, the easier it becomes to go after people.
    Finally, Mitnick offers some security advice to organizations:
    More companies have to think of a defense-in-depth strategy, rather than just protecting the perimeter.
    As someone who has penetrated innumerable network perimeters, Mitnick would know.
     

    CEOs like blogs, according to the limited research done on the topic, but you can bet they're learning that blogging cuts both ways. PRWeek and Burson-Marsteller surveyed 131 CEOs on blogs.
    About 59 percent of CEOs surveyed said they find Web logs, or blogs, useful for internal communications, while 47 percent see them as tools for communication with external audiences.
    Open communication cuts both ways. Many companies in the technology sector are adding employee blogs or corporate blogs, and it's spreading to other industries as well. Software vendors are doing their best to accomodate the demand for blogging. Marqui, which develops a content management system for marketers, added a blog module last month. IBM has added blogging capabilities to its Workplace, Lotus Notes, and Domino products. Having a dialogue with your customers or potential customers is great. Unless they had bad experience with your organization. But now IBM has an answer for that too. Yesterday, IBM unveiled its Public Image Monitoring Solution. It's built on WebSphere Information Integrator and employs text analytics and semantic search technology. It also uses multilingual text analytics from Nstein Technologies and the Factiva content database.
    The offering assesses the tone of blogs and posts: positive, negative, or neutral. It also identifies hot topics of discussion. For example, using the software to look at a particular make and model car would return content about fuel economy, roominess and safety.
    IBM executives say that Internet content is no longer authored by corporations, educational institutions, and the government, so companies have a greater need to see what's being said about them. It's sort of a Flamewar Finder.
     

    If the Pentagon ran the war on spyware, cookies would be called collateral damage. According to a new report by our friends over at JupiterResearch, multiple anti-spyware installations are taking a toll on third-party cookies, which are used by many organizations to track visitors to Web sites.
    ...over 48 million Internet users are running anti-spyware applications that delete third-party tracking cookies. And nearly 38 million are using aggressive anti-spyware applications that remove nearly 75% of tracking cookies.
    The first thing I had to sort through when writing our Spyware Guide for Intranet Journal was the "definition" question. Depending on how protective of your privacy you are, you might consider cookies a rather benign sort of spyware. They tend to add something to the Web experience, especially when e-commerce sites are involved, and I personally don't care whether advertisers are tracking which ads I've seen. I think the important thing to take away from this research is that spyware has become such a problem it's threatening to take cookies down with it. Among the recommendations in the JupiterResearch report is moving from third-party to first-party cookies.
    The report finds that companies moving to first-party cookies from third-party cookies typically see a 10% to 15% increase in unique visitors, 13% to 30% more repeat visitors and 10% to 30% more visitors attributed to specific marketing campaigns, all as a result of more accurate measurement.
    Don't forget, we have a Webcast on Developing an Enterprise Spyware Protection Strategy coming up next month.
     

    A few weeks back I posted an item about former White House cybersecurity advisor Howard Schmidt's notion that software programmers be held responsible for the security of the code they write. It struck me as an incomplete idea, one likely born more of frustration than serious rumination. But if voicing half-baked ideas were a crime, the blogosphere would implode overnight. The reason I bring it up is because Ken van Wyk, one of several excellent columnists over at eSecurity Planet, just wrote an insightful piece explaining why Schmidt's call for some kind of formal coder responsibility won't work.
    It's true in some engineering disciplines, we do hold the professional engineers liable for their design failures, particularly when public safety is involved. However, we musn't forget there's a world of difference between the practices in use in software engineering than in, say, civil engineering.
    That's because, van Wyk argues, civil engineers can rely on decades of experience translated into firm standards, something lacking in the relatively new software world:
    Even if one looks at the latest advances in software security best practices -- and there are several that are worthy of note -- we're a far cry away from any sort of published standards that can hold a candle to what civil engineers use.
    In the end, van Wyk says, the fundamental problem may be "our community's reluctance to truly learn from its mistakes." Alas, I don't expect that to change any time soon.
     

    Someday soon you may be able to buy a gallon of milk at your local Google Mart. Or perhaps down a quick ale at the neighborhood Google Brew. Or maybe admire some modern art at the Googleheim Museum. These are just a few ideas I'm throwing out for my friends at Google. I'm not expecting payment; just the satisfaction of being ahead of the curve. Because according to this article in the New York Times, the search-engine giant is striking fear across numerous economic sectors:
    Google's recent moves have stirred concern in industries from book publishing to telecommunications. Businesses already feeling the Google effect include advertising, software and the news media. Apart from retailing, Google's disruptive presence may soon be felt in real estate and auto sales.
    Even the mighty Wal-Mart "sees both a technology pioneer and the seed of a threat" in Google. Indeed, Google continues to increase its presence in the heart of Wal-Mart's global manufacturing headquarters, otherwise known as China. If the world's largest retailer is worried, is any industry safe from being Googled? Well, when you have a Wal-Mart board member saying stuff like this, one has to wonder:
    "We think there is plenty of opportunity for innovation in the Google economy."
     

    Gordon Taylor, a project manager from Australia, asked on his blog last week whether there was any innovation left in the world (I agree 1,000% with his point on movies). He then proceeded to map 21 "Web 2.0" products and traced them back to seven original ideas. In other words, the ideas were improvements on existing ideas and projects but not new innovations. Improvements to existing products or processes can benefit an organization just as much as a new idea (in my opinion), but to truly grow your business or make your department more valuable, you need a dose of innovation. Innovation expert Jim Carroll last week published "10 Signs that you've got an innovation dysfunction," which compares how things work at innovative organizations as opposed to dysfunctional organizations. The next day, Carroll added a new list of 10 more things that smart, innovative companies do to create an overall sense of innovation-purpose. The one that stands out to me has to do with experience and risk. I would bet that's where a lot of organizations run into innovation roadblocks.
    Build up experiential capital. Innovation comes from risk, and risk comes from experience. The most important asset today isn't found on your balance sheet — it is found in the accumulated wisdom from the many risks that you've taken. The more experiential capital you have, the more you'll succeed.
    Thanks to the Business Innovation 2005 blog for the links. It's a companion to the Fortune Innovation Forum, which is taking place Nov. 30 to Dec. 1 in New York City.
     

    Your first reaction is probably "Yes" and according to the preliminary results of a study conducted at the University of Washington and published in the Seattle P-I's Microsoft blog last week, you might be right. But probably not for the reasons you think. The researchers surfed the Web with an unpatched, un-updated version of Internet Explorer 6 just to see what they would catch. They were looking not only for malicious downloads, but so-called "drive-by" spyware you get just from visiting a Web site. They found that most spyware checks to see what browser configuration you're using, and in most cases, doesn't even bother if you're using Firefox. But those in the malware business want to spread their payloads as wide as possible, and using a browser like Firefox with 10 percent market share isn't going to cut it. The researchers stopped short of saying Firefox was just more secure than IE, but did note that in their observations when Firefox was compromised the attacks used an exploit in Java, not the browser itself. Speaking of Microsoft and spyware, the Windows Anti-Spyware software that's been in beta for the better part of a year now will be re-branded as Windows Defender and rolled into Windows Vista. Windows Update will deliver the spyware signatures.
     

    I've been increasing my security reading in preparation for our enterprise security Webcasts coming next month, and I have to tell you the news is rarely good. Anti-virus software, as we all know, scans the files on a computer looking for malicious files. But because PCs have so many individual files that need to be scanned, especially now that users store music, video, and pictures on their computers, shortcuts are built in so the software skips certain files it believes are safe. This method made everyone happy. It kept computers relatively safe and the scans at a reasonable time limit. Until now.
    Recently, researcher Andrey Bayora revealed that it is possible to fool the scanners into thinking that a file under scan is one kind, when it is in actuality something entirely different. Bayora (of www.securityelf.org), a Russian-born Israeli, has issued an advisory that details how to bypass many popular Windows AV programs.
    There's quite a list of Windows anti-virus programs that are impacted by this problem too. And the only way out is to change the design of the software's scans completely. On that note, have a nice weekend. Thanks to TechDirt for the link.
     

    There was a lot of news this week in the battle to make books searchable online. Gary Price over at SearchEngineWatch did a fine job summarizing all that happened this week with Google Print as well as Amazon's recent venture and a slew of existing book search projects that few people talk about. Tim Gray has the news that Google Print was going online yesterday. I haven't followed the Google Print thing all that closely. I think the brain cells I have devoted to copyright law were consumed by the digital music debate and have yet to regenerate. But I was looking at the interface to Google's Advanced Search today, as I am known to do, and saw a new option. It's a Usage Rights field that allows you to see results that:

    • aren't filtered by license (the default)
    • allow some forms of re-use
    • can be freely modified, adapted or built upon

    google.jpg

     

    I haven't done the research to back this up, but I bet technology for collaboration has one of the highest chances of becoming "shelfware." Things like collaborative workspaces and document management go to the heart of how people work. We're not natural knowledge sharers; we are creatures of habit. Andy Moore of KMWorld Magazine wrote recently about a collaboration technology deployment at MITRE Corp. MITRE worked on the premise that successfully deploying a technology must follow six hypothetical guidelines.
    1. The organization's culture must naturally support collaboration
    2. Exhaustive requirements analysis is needed to ensure success
    3. You need broad high-level management support
    4. The information technology (IT) infrastructure must be accommodating
    5. Build it and they will come
    6. You need a lot of money to deploy collaboration technologies
    No. 5 is an assumption that is often made with collaboration technology and it's rarely right. It wasn't right in MITRE's case.
    We had to build compelling business cases and publicize them to the workforce through their peers in order to win over skeptics. This is organizational change in action, and it's painful. No organization changes on its own accord without a compelling reason to do so.
    None of the six guideline proved entirely true for MITRE. There is a PDF of MITRE's experience available. Thanks to Jack Vinson for the link.
     

    If you're getting resistance to implementing a wireless network, there's a good chance security has something to do with it. That was certainly the case for the IT manager at a small New York law firm, who turned to EarthWeb's Practically Networked gurus for help.
    In any event, most of the employees here use laptop computers and would like to be able to maintain access to their e-mail and Internet research while attending conferences or just moving about the office. So I suggested to the partners that we implement a wireless network. At first they shot down the idea. The reason is due primarily to the stigma of insecurity associated with wireless networking, but I've finally been able to convince them that it could be safely implemented.
    The question: suggestions for maximizing wireless network security. The answers, which are pretty extensive, range from the general to the simple things that are often overlooked.
    Another option is to turn off the Wireless Access Point (WAP) when it's not in use. This one may seem simplistic, but few companies or individuals do it. If you have wireless users connecting only at certain times, so there's no reason to run the wireless network all the time. That only provides intruders with an opportunity to attempt to gain access to your wireless network when no one is around to notice. If you turn off the access point when it's not in use, such as at night when everyone goes home and there is no need for anyone to connect wirelessly, there is less opportunity for someone to try and gain access.
    We have a popular article on securing wireless networks over on Intranet Journal if you're looking for more information. Last week, I wrote about Selling the Suits on Web Content Management. I don't know if this is going to become a regular feature or not. If I can find the topics it might.
     

    One thing people in publishing like to do -- myself included -- is compile lists. They generate interest and (if all goes well) controversy, especially regarding what wasn't on the list. This month Fast Company has a piece whose premise is that there is a "creative class" in the U.S. and elsewhere and that its members are growing fastest in 15 particular cities. While parts of the article's premise are overstated ("For the first time, people aspire -- even expect -- to do work they love and to live in a community where they can be themselves." Really? First time?), it's an interesting take on trends in the modern workforce. The "creative class," as defined by the George Mason University professor who coined the term and wrote a book about it, includes:
    ..."scientists, engineers, artists, cultural creatives, managers, and professionals, who together comprise more than 30% of the total U.S. workforce and nearly half of the economy's wage and salary income."
    That's you, my creative and well-compensated friend! So where are you going to live next? I won't give away the entire list, but it includes 10 U.S. cities (including Sacramento, Phoenix and Salt Lake City) and five international cities.
     

    Russian technology workers have benefited greatly from U.S. corporations offshoring IT research, development and production projects. But now Russian tech workers, like thousands of their American counterparts, may be the victim of their own success. A Russian Web site devoted to promoting that country as a technology offshoring destination reports that rising salaries likely will prompt tech companies to search for cheaper labor in such places as India, China and Brazil.
    "Russia is a very important market for us. We see it as a high-growth market for our products and also a high-growth area for talent," (Motorola EVP Padmasree) Warrior said. "However, other countries are competing (to attract IT companies)."
    Nice little tech community you got here. I'd hate to see those unreasonably high wages ruin it. I'm sure Ms. Warrior wasn't making a threat, per se; rather, she simply was stating the cold reality of the modern global economy and the relentless (ruthless?) corporate chase for the cheapest labor dollar.
     

    That was the title of a Mike Nichols movie back in 1991. The tagline, according to IMDB, was "The story of a man who had everything, but found something more." As regular readers know, I read Henry Blodget's blog (he's listed in the new list of Blogs We Read on the left side of the main page); I occassionally read his stuff on Slate; and I think he's a great writer. Bloomberg columnist Mark Gilbert disagrees. Well, he thinks Blodget is "a talented scribe." But it's safe to say he thinks Blodget should not be writing about Internet companies, stock prices, and tech company outlooks.
    Sure, the rules may allow it. Reading Blodget's views on the likes of Yahoo! Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., though, is akin to hearing former Enron Corp. Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lay lecture on accounting, or former Tyco International Ltd. CEO L. Dennis Kozlowski comment on executive perks. The skin crawls. The hackles rise. It all seems a bit surreal.
    At one time, Blodget probably had everything. After he got in trouble, he paid a $4 million fine. The NASD, the SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange barred him for life from the securities industry. That's time served to me. Blodget still knows something about business, and has interesting insight on tech companies that he shares in an interesting way. If you don't like him, obviously you don't have to read him. And if you want to point out things in business, and in the stock market specifically, that make the skin crawl, surely you can find a better target than Henry Blodget. That being said, I wouldn't invest a dime based on what he writes.
     

    Does watching the traffic patterns at Starbucks tell us something about the demand for universal broadband wireless access? It's an interesting question posed by Pip Coburn at the Always-On network.
    Five years ago, I could get a seat at 11 am or 3 pm. Two years ago, it was pretty tough to get a seat. Folks were sitting and chatting, and as our brilliant friend and observer J.C. Herz says, "paying for a break." Today I can't get a seat, but fewer and fewer folks are taking a "break."
    According to his theory, in 2005 and 2006 average people want to connect their laptops when they do work at Starbucks. In 2007, people get used to connecting at Starbucks. In 2008, they want to connect everywhere they go. A couple of observations: I don't think I'm going out on a limb when I say that Starbucks customers (and I like Starbucks) are early technology adopters and have more disposable income than the average American. Marketers have clearly noticed this trend. Take a look at the CDs, usually aimed at hipsters and baby-boomers, Starbucks sells in its stores. Wireless broadband adoption is key to these people. You are seeing the early adopters growing, but in general wireless adoption has a long way to go. Also, the Starbucks observations were made in New York. The last couple of days aside, it's been getting cold here in the Northeast. Thus, more people in Starbucks, which specializes in warm beverages. And the pumpkin spice latte is here. And it's darn tasty. Thanks to Dominic Basulto at the Corante New York blog for the link.
     

    For companies trafficking in online content, their Google rankings are a precious commodity. If your content isn't at or near the top of Google's rankings for a relevant search, it might as well not exist to vast numbers of readers. As if the straight-up competition for Google primacy isn't hard enough, it turns out your site can fall victim to thieves who steal your content and then "game" Google to usurp you in the rankings. Executive Tech columnist Brian Livingston has all the details here on what has become known as "Googlewashing." The column focuses on a French group known as Dark SEO Team and its successful efforts to "Googlewash" a personal blog -- written by a Google employee! Tu as de l'audace! Brian promises next week to tell readers how to prevent their online content from being copied.
     

    I'm going to be talking about spyware and online fraud next month as part of a series of Jupiter Webcasts called Enterprise Security Challenges for 2006. George Spafford, a frequent contributor here at EarthWeb's IT Management Channel, gets it started on Dec. 1 when he talks about Developing a Patch Management Strategy That Works. I'm talking about spyware on Dec. 8 and online fraud on Dec. 15. This will be more than "Spyware is bad" and tips on how to clean up your brother's friend's PC. We're going to talk about Developing an Enterprise Spyware Protection Strategy because, by some estimates, two-thirds of corporate PCS have spyware. The same theme of educating your end users will be applied to Strategies for Defeating Online Fraud. We'll discuss protecting your enterprise users, but also your customers and your corporate brand, which can be hijacked by criminals, fraudsters and other malevolent characters. The Webcasts are free for all to attend, and they're sponsored by Symantec. I hope you take part. If your spyware problems can't wait until December, check out Intranet Journal's Spyware Guide. Now back to your regularly scheduled IT Management blog.
     

    Earlier this week, in an article dated Nov. 14, Forbes published a story about the Attack of the Blogs. It was, as you probably know by now, poorly received in the (oh I do hate this word) blogosphere. But I'm not writing this morning about the attack of the blogs, or the beat-down that Forbes reporter Daniel Lyons received all across the Internet universe. Today, Forbes warns us about another menace in Matt Rand's piece Open Source Invades the Enterprise. All that money and attention on Al Qaeda and the folks at Homeland Security let blogs and open source software waltz right on in. A couple of comments: if Forbes is trying to serve as an example of slow-moving mainstream media, or show us why newspaper publishers are getting hammered this year, then it's doing an excellent job. These are not new stories, and one result is that bloggers are feasting on Forbes this week. Second, the open-source piece is a decent round-up of what's been happening in the software world. It talks about larger, more established software companies making moves into the open-source market with investments like SAP's interest in Socialtext. It talks about some customer wins with solid ROI. But it also quotes analysts from the usual suspects. I see Gartner, Forrester, and IDC all present and accounted for. One of the problems with this is the growing sentiment among technology executives that these firms don't do a good enough job covering open-source software because open-source projects don't play the analyst game. James McGovern did a good job explaining the game, where analysts pursue vendors with big marketing budgets, in a post last week.
    If analysts want to sell folks like me on buying their research, they will need to start telling the whole story which includes open source projects. They need to tell the story of enterprises whose business is not software but created valuable working software for others to consume. The secret is out and if analysts want to survive, they will do well by considering this value proposition.
     

    There's a good piece here about disaster recovery that includes advice on planning for the worst before it's too late. The article is on a Web site called Campus Technology, though the lessons can apply to any enterprise. One of the experts quoted in the article offers not only steps to developing a disaster recovery plan, but also the elements any recovery plan should include, such as:
    1. Plan for regular backup. Self-evident.
    2. Plan for archiving. The key here: Store the copies elsewhere.
    3. Thorough risk analysis. This encompasses prioritizing business needs and figuring out what the major risks are for your enterprise.
    4. Business impact analysis. This helps you decide the order in which functions are restored after an outage.
    5. Crisis management. Working with safety officials (police, fire) to establish appropriate emergency procedures.
    6. Recovery planning. Figuring out who does what when.
    Hopefully your enterprise never will be hit with a disaster. Unfortunately, hope's not much of a plan.
     

    There's nothing like beating an idea into the ground reiterating a good point: Blogs, if used wisely, are a potentially valuable resource for businesses. Steven Warren makes the case for corporate blogs here, and Mike Pastore passes along some useful tips here. And now, via Paul McNamara's 'Net Buzz column over at Network World, we have some creative examples of how companies can use blogs to improve efficiency and promote their brands. Money quote (from a blogging software vendor CEO):
    "What is important in terms of corporate adoption is to stop thinking about blogs as a technology or blogs in and of themselves, but think of them as a tactic to empower a whole new level of authors in or outside your company."
    Words of wisdom, Lloyd. Words of wisdom.* * (Name that movie quote!)
     

    I followed the Microsoft announcement today more closely than I normally would. I'm spending my afternoon editing a story for Intranet Journal tomorrow about collaborating with Web-based word processors. It's safe to say Mr. Gates and friends could have made my story irrelevant with one swift move. But it doesn't appear they did. As usual with these things, it's going to take some time for details to emerge, especially since it's been reported the live demo at the announcement in San Francisco failed to work. I kept tabs by monitoring Todd Bishop's excellent Microsoft blog from the Seattle P-I and the Microsoft Monitor from Joe Wilcox. It appears my look at Writely, Writeboard, and Zoho Writer is good to go tomorrow morning. Says Wilcox:
    There's been a lot of chatter about how this is a response to Google or how it's Microsoft being dragged into offering these type of services at the expense of losing its traditional market for Office apps. Well, that analysis is all wrong. Microsoft has been planning this for quite some time, long before it would appear as a response to Google or anyone else. Let's also make one thing clear, these services aren't about replacing Windows or Office nor is this a retreat from the traditional Office applications. If you're looking to replace your Word, Excel, PowerPoint or Outlook with this set of offerings, you're looking in the wrong place.
    Let's assume this is a little bit about Google (and many, many people will insist it is more than that). This is an interesting move for Microsoft. The new services — the precise nature of which remains a mystery — will be, in part, supported by advertising. Google, we learn more everyday, is an advertising company. But Microsoft has the applications in its desktop productivity suite. It's never good for a company when they have to cross onto the other guy's turf. Both Dan Farber and Wilcox see MSN moving more front and center to be one result of all of this, which again goes back to advertising.
     

    Venture Capitalist Rick Segal has been asking one question in particular of the people at start-ups: "What do you think of the Microsoft vs. Google battles, both today and ones to come?" It's an open-ended question, and he doesn't have an answer in mind, he just wants to see what kind of answers he gets. In his blog yesterday, he shared some basic conclusions based on the answers he's received.
    Google's plan of just giving away as much as possible and sharing revenue with everybody on everything is a dead simple message that everybody just gets. Regardless how evil or not you think Google is or isn't, the message that developers are hearing is this: Use our stuff and let's make money together.
    I thought that was interesting because for a company as large and successful as Microsoft, it's never been great at conveying its message. Its marketing nomenclature can get extremely confusing at times. Google is much more simple thoughout. One warning Segal issues centers on the whole idea of Google as an advertising company.
    While nobody wants to ship 50lb bags of dog food for free in return for advertising, the whole notion of free whatever making money by highly targeted advertising seems to be taking on a bit of bubble 1.0, make it up in volume, kinda hype. Worth watching because at a certain point, somewhere, advertising can't cover it all. At least I don't think so, could be wrong.
    Thanks to Don Dodge for the link.
     

    Search Datamation Blog