Free Newsletters :

Articles in “August 2005” from Datamation Blog

I saw this earlier in the week on Computerworld, but didn't have a chance to talk about it. It seems IT consultancy Gartner mentioned in an SEC filing that it is reviewing opportunities to make acquisitions in the $50 to $100 million range. You'll remember that in April Gartner purchased Meta Group, another IT consulting group that (like Gartner) is based in Stamford, Conn. Mergers in the Internet space are back in the news in general. Everyone is waiting for Skype to be bought, with Google being named most often. Going back to The New York Times purchase of About.com and News Corp.'s acquisition of MySpace parent company Intermix, merges of offline and online organizations are becoming the fad. Writing in BusinessWeek, Steve Rosenbush has more ideas that focus on combining online resources to offline brands.
All in all, the environment is light-years away from that of the recent past, when Internet deals hinged on a hope and a prayer. The values of Net companies then were based on page views and other assorted metrics. Now the froth has been skimmed. The survivors are generating ad revenue. "Now it's about money."
How does this sound for matchmaking? TheKnot.com and Target; or iVillage and Lifetime.
 

I have a theory about why terrorists have yet to attack the Internet directly: they need it as much as we do. Since irony is the basis of life on our planet, if my theory is true, this is one of the ultimate ones: A bunch of nut cases that want to set civilization back a thousand years are succored in their deranged efforts by an infidel technology without which they would need smoke signals and post riders to get their messages through. Go figure.
 

I am the editor of Intranet Journal, after all. Paul Miller, one of the founders of the Intranet Benchmarking Forum (IBF) in the U.K., alerted me to a story about the IBF (PDF version in the link) in the Financial Times this morning. In addition to explaining how the IBF works, the article talks about some of the innovative ways companies use their intranet.
Sometimes it is the surprisingly small things that make big savings. The BBC, for example, put all its taxi bookings on the intranet, saving about £2.50 in administrative cost per booking. Though the BBC's annual taxi bill is still high, the intranet is helping shave an estimated £1.7m off costs.
The value of the IBF is that it gives intranet teams a chance to see other organizations' intranets and talk to other intranet teams, which is a rarity because intranets by definition just aren't accessible to outsiders. It's also worth noting the IBF will be having its first U.S. meeting in March in New York.
 

I haven't seen any yet, but greedy, heartless sleazebags soon will try to cash in on the suffering of thousands of Hurricane Katrina victims by using the Internet to steal money from people who want to contribute to relief efforts. The same thing happened early this year after a tsunami in south Asia claimed more than 150,000 lives. Security software vendor ESET has some good, basic advice on how to spot such scams making the email rounds. Among ESET's tips:
If you didn't opt-in, delete. Unsolicited emails appealing for donations are almost always fraudulent. Don't be fooled by appearance -- emails can appear legitimate by copying the graphics and language of a legitimate organization. Don't click through to links -- links in emails can lead to "spoofed" Web sites that mirror the look and feel of a genuine organization.
 

A few years back I organized a series of monthly technology breakfast forums in Boston. One of the sessions was all about nanotechnology. If you're totally unfamiliar with the term, or a bit hazy as to what it's all about, read the definition here. Go on, read it. I'll wait. And then come back. Pretty dry stuff, right? That's what the breakfast was like. The only reason I didn't fall asleep was because I was moderating a panel and had to honor the minimum requirement of wakefulness. But even I have to admit that this real-world application of nanotechnology is pretty exciting news.
 

Apple Computer may as well quit acting coy about its "special event" in San Francisco on Sept. 7. The well-traveled word on the street is that Apple and Motorola will unveil an iTunes-enabled cell phone. Not only that, but Cingular Wireless reportedly has won the honor of being the first to distribute the much-anticipated device, which will be able to download music over a wireless network using iTunes software. Motorola announced earlier this summer that an iTunes-enabled cell phone would go on sale in late September, making Apple's efforts at building suspense all-the-more puzzling (and, honestly, a little bit silly). Attempts at hype aside, it does sound like a cool tech toy. The one remaining mystery concerns pricing. I guess we'll find out soon enough. Or maybe sooner!
 

A controversial study by some controversial scientists to be published in November's British Journal of Psychology will claim that men, on average, have an IQ five points higher than women. The five-point gain occurs at age 14; until that point, boys and girls have comparable IQs, the study says. That doesn't explain another British study (Warning: must be fluent in conversational British) that says men are more likely than women to get spam, online viruses, and fall for Internet scams. This is despite the fact that men are apparently more familiar with online threats and have a better understanding of the terminology. This second survey was done by StreamShield, which makes Internet protection software.
Geoff Bennett, Director of Product Marketing at StreamShield insisted that the research proves that there is a clear difference between the male and female experience when online, suggesting that this may be due to the "two sexes may be using the Internet differently."
Men get more spam, spyware, and viruses because of how they use the Internet, even though they know what the threats are. We know what that means.
 

Give a New York Times reporter a tour of your operations center, but don't allow him publish its location, other than the "central United States." It's ironic, actually, because as the story in the Times points out, virtually every step in the credit card processing chain, from transaction to statement, is outsourced. No one has put Visa's operations center under siege by dropping forces into the central U.S., but as we saw in June, data from 40 million credit cards was exposed through a processor. If you're not familiar with the details of the credit card industry, which is interesting in that the big brands are more associations than companies, the article talks a lot about how security compliance between banks, processors, and large retailers seems to fall into a gray area. Much has been talked about, but real action seems to be lacking.
In 2003, Visa led a series of discussions with MasterCard, American Express and other major card brands to establish a set of security standards and a timetable for complying with them. Yet only one-third of the 400 small and midsize processors, which together handle about 10 percent of all domestic transactions, can say they currently meet the industry's requirements, even though the standards took effect in September 2004. Less than 0.3 percent of the country's roughly five million merchants are known to have taken any compliance steps at all.
Thanks to Bruce Schneier for the link. --Mike Pastore
 

You know how sometimes researchers release the results of a study and your immediate reaction is, "They had to conduct a study to prove this?" I mean stuff like "Using Cell Phones Distracts Drivers" or "Beautiful Women Make Men Stupid." To the Canon of the Painfully Obvious we now can add this stunning revelation on why companies outsource.
 

Gartner last week released its Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle, which sounds like something that would put into perspective a lot of the technology predictions we hear in the mainstream press. But instead it's just one of 68 "Hype Cycles" Gartner will release this year.
...the Hype Cycle highlights the progression of an emerging technology from conception, to market over-enthusiasm, through a period of disillusionment, to an eventual understanding of the technology's relevance and role in a market or domain.
There are three key technology themes for business in this year's Hype Cycle: Collaboration, Next Generation Architecture, and Real World Web. Among the technologies listed in the categories are applications that have already been hyped, and in some cases over-hyped. It's nice to see some of the themes we've been covering at Intranet Journal getting some recognition, such as podcasting, RSS, and corporate blogging. Gartner seems pretty bullish on wikis:
Gartner predicts that Wikis will impact ad hoc collaboration, group authoring, content management, web site management, innovation, project execution and research and development.
--Mike Pastore
 

It's been almost a year since I've been able to log on to a certain (not to be named but I'd sure like to) online music distribution company. I've emailed their customer service department about 12 times (no lie) asking for help. All I get back is a "We've received your email and will handle your request as quickly as possible" message. Well, I think my cry for help goes directly from that auto-reply server to the trash bin. I can't even find a phone number for these guys and I'm a journalist! I guess my point is, if you are going to use technology as the linchpin of you customer service, then you should make sure it works for the people that actually use it: your customers. Technology solutions are only good if they solve a problem, otherwise the millions you "saved" by implementing ___________ (enter name of technology here) could have been better spent on a phone line and a live person who could actually help solve a problem instead of causing one.  Allen Bernard, Managing Editor, CIO Update.com PS - I put "saved" in quotes because to get me (and the other thousands of people probably having similar problems) back as customers is going to cost you a lot more.
 

Here are some more details on the arrests of two suspects in the Zotob and Mytob computer worm cases. The Techworld piece gives a lot of credit to Microsoft for its cooperation with law enforcement:
The software vendor, through a division it created two years ago to investigate cybercrime, provided the FBI with technical information and analytical support that was then shared with Turkish and Moroccan police.
As it stands now, it looks like the suspects -- two males, 18 and 21 years old -- will be prosecuted in their own countries rather than being extradited to the U.S.
 

Did you get your piece of cake? Funny... I missed mine. Shouldn't there be cake all around? We saw this week the tenth anniversary of Windows 95. Do you remember the hooplah that accompanied the release? The glitzy commercials? The promises? People waiting in long lines to get their copy? It was craziness. It was excitement. Are you seeing any of that for the promised release of Longhorn? I haven't yet. I think we've all gotten over that kind of excitement. We probably can thank the Internet boom and bust for that. Maybe we all lost too many stock options to rah rah much over new software releases. A cheaper iPod... now then I'd be excited. But I have to give it up to Microsoft anyway. Ten years old and people are still using Windows 95. Are they just avoiding the bugs in newer releases? Could be. But Win 95 is still working for a whole lot of people. And these days, that's saying something.
 

...I mean, let's hope justice prevails in the Mytob and Zotob computer worm cases, in which arrests have been made by law enforcement officials in Morocco and Turkey. And then string 'em up.
 

I wrote on Wednesday about an article in the New York Times reporting on how Googles runaway growth and ambitions are making the digital search king the new technology company to hate. The old one, of course, is Microsoft and its incredibly wealthy founder, Bill Gates. Redmond-bashing long has been a major activity in the tech industry, and I myself have been a frequent and gleeful participant. Who knows, I might even bash Microsoft or Gates again before this post ends. But it wont be over an issue raised today at Salon (registration required; sorry). According to the story, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is being vilified in some circles for pledging more than $10 million to a Seattle think tank that promotes the teaching of "Intelligent Design" in schools. While the Discovery Institute does indeed advocate for Intelligent Design - which challenges the theory of evolution -- thats just one of its areas of focus. Others include spreading broadband to more U.S. homes, chiefly by removing regulations, and reducing tax and regulatory barriers to spark economic growth. Taken together, these are politically charged issues argued from a traditionally conservative view. But the money donated by the Gates Foundation is going toward another Discovery project called Cascadia, whose goal is to improve transportation in the Pacific Northwest. Cascadia appears to be a bipartisan, non-political effort, and Gates Foundation spokespeople have made it clear that the grant money is for Cascadia only. The Foundation contributes zero to Discoverys Intelligent Design efforts, and is not abandoning its support of sound science. Say what you will about Microsoft, but Bill and Melinda Gates have been incredibly generous to a number of good causes through their foundation. Lets hope they're not tarnished unfairly because of these contributions to Discovery.
 

It only makes sense to wait until Vonage discloses financial documents before assessing the VoIP player's rumored initial public offering. But my quick take is that while Vonage is the current U.S. market leader in voice over IP -- it has 800,000 households using its services to make phone calls over the Internet -- its list of powerful competitors is long and sobering. Among the companies fighting for VoIP market share are telecoms such as AT&T and Verizon and cable firms such as Comcast and Time Warner. Internet gorillas such as Google, Microsoft and AOL also are adding voice functionality to IM and online games. Meanwhile, Skype, an Internet telephony company based in Luxembourg, has 50 million global subscribers to its free service. (Full disclosure: I use Skype and have had great success with it.) Vonage reportedly hopes to raise $600 million with its IPO. It'll need a deep war chest to win this battle.
 

It was Abraham Lincoln who said (or so they say) "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." Honest Abe apparently didn't say anything about those who keep their mouths shut but get quotes attributed to them anyway. It's happened to some of the most famous and intelligent minds in the tech industry, like IBM's Thomas Watson, who is often quoted as saying "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." And Bill Gates, who supposedly said "640K ought to be enough for anybody." USA Today's Kevin Maney, who wrote a book about the aforementioned Watson, devoted a column this summer to debunking these and other famous quotes from the technology world that never happened. In addition to exposing fictitious quotes, Maney devotes some space to clarifying and adding context to quotes by William Orton, president of Western Union, who professed no faith in this thing called the telephone; and Harry Warner, of the Warner Brothers, who didn't understand why people would pay to hear actors talk. In our efforts to attribute such quotes to famous people, we overlook some of the most veracious things ever said about technology. Like my favorite by Saturday Night Live's Jack Handey:
One thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse.
You'll find me on the golf course tomorrow. Have a nice weekend. Thanks to Ed Bott for the link. -- Mike Pastore
 

To Mike Pastore's post below about outsourcing demand outpacing India's supply of IT talent, I would add China to the list of countries that could become the new IT outsourcing capital of the world. This article on ebusinessforum.com explains why.
 

Two recent articles have shed light on a quiet storm - the boom in high-tech jobs.

Datamations James Maguire filed a thorough report recently on the good news in the IT job market:

The job market for tech workers has rebounded considerably since the dark days of 2000 and 2001, according to a recent report by outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas.

John Challenger, the firms CEO, tells Datamation that hes bullish on tech hiring. Its a strong job market for IT, he says. Its picked up in the last two to three years -- quite heavily.

& Between the first and second quarters of this year, job hiring announcements spiked 184 percent, according to Challenger figures.


Another writer has also chimed in on the boom. Well-known technology journalist Michael Malone explores the subject in his Silicon Insider column. A recent drive from Silicon Valley up to AT&T Park to watch the Giants got him thinking about the boom and why it hasnt been reported:

One (reason) is the media, everyone's favorite whipping boy these days. Let's face it (and I've been a journalist long enough to know), the press is hesitant to ever credit a Republican president for a strong economy  for fear it might help the GOP win the next election and prove correct all of those absurd ideas like tax cuts.

A second reason, I believe, is superstition. Not just economically, but psychically, we took a devastating double whammy from the one-two punches of the tech crash of 2000 and September 11, 2001. One of the greatest economic miracles of modern times is how the U.S. managed to come all of the way back from that multi-trillion-dollar loss in only a half decade. But no one seems to want to talk about that  because, psychologically, I think we are still shell-shocked."


I recently embarked on a similar trip to San Francisco and I also noticed another boom that Malone writes about: the boom in luxury cars.

BMWs in particular are fresh in my mind, because of the shenanigans of some jerk. We'd stopped at the Father Junipero Serra rest stop on Interstate 280. The rest stop features a big statue of a pointing Father Serra (a statue that Stanford students like to dress up for the Big Game with Cal).

I was walking with my son to the rest stop's bathroom, when a shiny new black BMW with tinted windows came racing through the parking lot like he was still on the freeway. He was throttling it hard. I wanted to throttle him. Reminded me of the stressed out tech execs and venture capitalists of the late 90s.

Lets hope this latest boom will produce many great products, lots of jobs, more media coverage & but fewer out-of-control venture capitalists and lame-brained entrepreneurs.

 

I try not to get too much news from CNN, and I'll give you an example why. This past Sunday, while eating breakfast, I flipped between CNN and ESPN to catch up on what I missed while I was out and about all day Saturday. CNN aired a very timely segment on improving the fuel efficiency in your car. Recommendation No. 1: Don't drive with the windows open, it increases drag. Recommendation No. 2: Don't use the air conditioning. Click. But I digress. CNN did cover a Gartner report that says India, outsourcing capital of the world, will have trouble holding that title in the near future. India has problems with its infrastructure and keeping up with the demand for skilled workers, according to the report. There are also basic economics at play:
Given that India's been doubling its outsourcing operations every year for the past four years, Chohan said he's not too surprised by the current imbalance in the labor demand-supply equation as well as the onset of wage inflation and high levels of attrition.
Outsourcing is going to follow the cheap labor. The Gartner report mentions the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Hungary and Poland, as those who can challenge India as the outsourcing capital of the world. --Mike Pastore
 

I note for three reasons the news that Playboy next month will launch a Web version of its print magazine: 1. Its a cheap way to get page views. 2. It could mean more workplace porn hassles for IT managers. 3. Did I mention the cheap page views? Regarding No. 2, a good piece in Computerworld two months ago reported that more than half of Fortune 500 companies have had at least one computer porn-related incident in the past 12 months. And its no laughing matter. In 44 percent of the cases the culprits were fired, according to a survey cited in the article, while another 41 percent of incidents resulted in disciplinary action. That kind of thing costs an organization money, disrupts business and affects morale. In addition to Playboys cyber plans, it appears the monthslong lull in pornographic spam (I didnt know there was one) has ended. So IT managers can expect an even larger flow of objectionable images into their networks. While were on the topic, in every story I read about the hazards of porn in the workplace, theres always some expert warning about the possibility of sexual harassment lawsuits. Has there ever been one? If so, I cant find it. Anyone who knows, please drop me a note.
 

Ed Bott, a Windows and Office guru, is tracking reviews of the Windows Vista Beta 1 release on his blog. We know that Beta 1 is geared toward developers and those who are very technically inclined. So it should come as no surprise that Ed found issues with reviews published in both the Boston Globe and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. I think it's safe to say that the reviewers in the mainstream press were in over their heads, focusing mainly on cosmetic changes and simply installing the far-from-finished product. Of course, being savvy enough to install the software is a good first step. From the AJC review, after the writer had trouble installing the beta on three PCs:
When I finally tried it on a fourth computer at work, I realized that the disc was a DVD, not a CD. Have I mentioned I can be a bit dim-witted? None of the machines I used had a DVD drive.
And he felt compelled to include this in his review because... Ed did find a review he liked, and not only because it took a favorable view of Vista Beta 1, but because it had substance. It's in Government Computing News (you can find it here), and it talks quite a bit about the new security features in Vista. And since security is the most popular topic when Microsoft comes up, that seems like a good place to start. --Mike Pastore
 

There's an interesting article in today's New York Times about how many in the technology world -- particularly in northern California's Silicon Valley -- are turning against Google, the corporation. Here's the nut paragraph in Gary Rivlin's piece:
It was not that long ago that Google reigned here as the upstart computer company that could do no wrong. Now some working in the technology field are starting to draw comparisons between Google and Microsoft, the company in Redmond, Wash., that Silicon Valley loves most to hate.
And here's one of the article's money quotes:
"In the day, you'd hear that Microsoft was the evil empire, especially in Silicon Valley," said Brian Lent, president of Medio Systems, a start-up in Seattle working on mobile-phone-based search. "Google is the new evil empire, because they're in such a powerful position in terms of control. They have potential monopolistic control over access to information."
That last sentence, if true, is pretty scary. It'll be interesting to see how things continue to evolve. But for many people in the tech industry who root for the underdog, it seems Google has jumped the shark.
 

With Google letting everyone in on its rather poorly kept IM secret, today is a good day to discuss the state of collaboration. It's one of the areas we cover on our Intranet Journal site. An Oracle exec writing over at Line56.com this week echoes something I've heard for years from those in the collaboration and usability areas: e-mail as a collaborative platform is just awful. (Thanks to the Shared Spaces blog for the link.)
While very powerful, e-mail is not inherently secure across organizational boundaries and provides very little structure for teams to work together. As the volume of e-mail increases, important items are increasingly lost in a sea of information. Keeping track of approvals or the latest version of documents is difficult if not impossible. The bottom line is that e-mail is an ineffective tool for team collaboration.
The result, according to the author, is an increase in collaborative team spaces, including the new one Oracle (surprise!) unveiled this week. All of the familiar names are involved in the space. In addition to Oracle, IBM has its Lotus Workspace product and Microsoft has both its Groove and SharePoint products. There are some other names that have been doing the workspace thing for some time: SiteScape's Forum and WebWorkZone and Documentum's eRoom come to mind. I do hear one major concern about these workspace products, and that's the fine line they have to tread between letting the users have control and making sure the sites and forums don't proliferate out of control. As we've increased our coverage of SharePoint on Intranet Journal I've heard from several people with horror stories about Windows SharePoint Services sites getting out of control. Those who turn to collaborative workspaces have to ensure they don't repeat the problems of e-mail. Otherwise they have to go back to using the telephone. --Mike Pastore
 

A recent column by one of CIO Update's guest columnists, Andy Hayler of Kalido, got me thinking about IT and its struggles to provide services in the way its users want to consume them. It's the word "users." In Andy's column he points out that the only other "industry" that refers to its customers as "users" is the narcotics business. To better meet the demands of the people that consume what IT produces maybe it's time to stop referring to these people as "users" and call them what they are: customers. I know that changing one word in a lexicon isn't going to instantly solve all IT's problems, but it can't hurt. By referring to users as customers, IT folks will start to see them for what they really are and, in the long run, this may help IT folks rethink how they relate to the people that are consuming what they produce and, therefore, provide better services. This is not a new idea, I realize, but if history is any sort of guide, then changing the way one group refers to another often means the difference between stigmatizing and understanding. And, if you can understand a group as diverse as the "user community" then maybe it will be easier to solve their problems because you are starting with your own.  Allen Bernard, Managing Editor, CIO Update.com
 

What would you guess is the percentage of households in the U.S. using dial-up connections to access the Internet? Thirty-five percent? Forty-five percent? If I went by people I know, I'd ballpark the answer below 20 percent. But the real figure is an amazing (to me, anyway) 56 percent, according to a new report from JupiterResearch. I say amazing because it's hard for me to fathom how people can tolerate dial-up. I have a dial-up account that I keep as a back-up to my DSL at home, where I work. The few times a year I'm forced to use dial-up, not only does it make me not want to be online, it makes me not want to have electricity. It's slow torture. But there are good reasons why more than half of the Internet-enabled households in the U.S. have stayed in the slow lane. Not everyone spends vast chunks of their time glued to a Web browser, the way many of us in the tech and publishing industries do. Therefore, they dont want or need to spend a lot of money for a high-speed connection. And sometimes, notably in rural areas, its simply a matter of availability. But JupiterResearch concludes that critical mass of broadband has arrived and forecasts that 80 percent of online U.S. households will have broadband by 2010. Thats why youll see more of this kind of price war to lure dial-up customers to broadband.
 

I saw this on Bruce Schneier's blog. Bruce is one of the most level-headed folks in the security industry. There is a report out of the U.K. that thieves are using Bluetooth-enabled phones to find Bluetooth-enabled laptops in cars. Once they've located a laptop, they can break into the car and take it. Or, you know, steal the car and get a bonus in the laptop. According to Bruce, laptop owners need to make sure the Bluetooth technology is turned off when they aren't using the computer. And if you need another reason to disable your Bluetooth connection, six London rail stations recently did trials of Bluetooth billboards.
As people walk past the posters they receive a message on their phone asking them if they wish to accept the advert. If they do, they can receive movies, animations, music, or still images further promoting the advertised product.
This is all part of the cycle of technology where something fills an important purpose, then it gets abused and a backlash is created. It happened with the telephone, where marketers get much of the blame. It happened with cell phones, where rude people ruined it. It happened with e-mail, when it became a conduit for spam. Before you know it, you're perfectly willing to live without something you needed not all that long ago. --Mike Pastore
 

According to a report in today's LA Times, Google is planning to launch an IM service as early as this Wednesday. Looking to compete with major Internet portals, like AOL and Yahoo, the search engine giant is reportedly coming out with the new service, coined Google Talk, to get them into that arena. This will help put Google on the offensive, since its competitors have recently been moving into its search engine space. The LA Times also reports that Google Talk is designed to let users chat using more than their keyboards. Users with headsets plugged into their computers reportedly will be able to have conversations with other users on headsets. While a Google spokesperson told the Times that they would be releasing a new product this week, that person declined to say if it would be Google Talk. Sources say Google has been testing the service for the past month. -- Sharon Gaudin
 

A survey of 100 CIOs in the United Kingdom shows that a whopping 80 percent have no confidence that their email systems comply with regulations. To make matters worse, only 18 percent say their current investment in the systems is sufficient. And 99 percent of those surveyed say email could have a negative impact on their company's reputation, according to Cryoserver Ltd., the London-based email management company that performed the survey. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put this together. A fairly impressive percentage of CIOs are biting their nails down to bloody stumps because they're not able to meet regulations when it comes to their email systems. And yet they're not spending any money to fix the situation -- most likely because their budgets are tight and other critical matters are screaming for attention. But when it comes to matters of compliance, CIOs, CFOs and CEOs need to realize how high the stakes are. Maybe it's time to rethink IT budgets and figure out how to meet regulations. And the survey may have been conducted in the U.K., but how different is the situation here in the U.S.? -- Sharon Gaudin
 

IBM is partnering with an independent user group to entice more young people to consider a career in mainframe computing. Big Blue and the user group SHARE say they will provide contacts and resources to IT students to steer them toward jobs riding the big iron. Encouragement and a spirited mainframe blog are fine and dandy, but I think the partnership needs to ratchet up the marketing sizzle considerably if it hopes to attract today's youth to what many would consider their grandfather's computer. So to help out, here are a few surefire mainframe-career marketing ideas: -- Cartoon superhero called "Mainframe Man" (optional sideckick: "Batch Boy") -- Honorary DB2 certification to rapper 50 Cent -- Product placement (perhaps the super-sexy IBM z9!) in next Tom Cruise movie -- A mainframe blog! (Sorry, they have that covered.) I have plenty more, but that should get them started.
 

There's an interesting concept put forth in this article from Technology Review. The cost of computer hardware keeps falling, thanks to commoditization. Open source makes software more affordable. The end result, the article says, is start-ups with low overhead and lots of new ideas.
Since you don't have to put out a lot of capital to start, you're going to see a real creative wave of products.
Low capital costs are, of course, a radical departure from the days when software start-ups spent like wild on technology using funds from venture capitalists. This is all possible, according to those in the article, because the quality of open source software has improved.
In the past, one had to have plenty of technical know-how and patience to use open-source software. Although tech know-how is still required, the programs have gotten much easier to use and the support much better.
The anecdotes in the article seem to prove that using open source software and keeping hardware costs down can speed time to market. And I would assume the creativity increase comes from the low capital opening doors for just about everyone. We've been through this before, I think, back when anyone's good idea could become a stock market darling. But these entrepreneurs don't have to deal with VCs that think they know everything. We'll see if they do any better without them. --Mike Pastore
 

I'm not even close to being a "gamer" -- the only video game I ever play is Madden. But a lot of ITers are, so I'm posting a second consecutive item on video games because this one is about a more important topic than the exorbitant price of Microsoft's upcoming Xbox 360. Two university professors who conducted an empirical review of 20 years of research into the effects of video games have concluded that children who play violent video games are more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior. The researchers said players "tend to imitate the moves they just 'acted out' in the game they played." I know from personal experience that this is true. Once, after a particularly high-scoring game of Madden, I absolutely toasted my wife on a fly pattern to our living room. Seriously, as reflexively defensive as many gamers are about purported links between violent video games and aggressive behavior, it's hard to dismiss a growing and consistent body of research supporting this thesis. And with politicians realizing they can score points and even raise campaign money with this issue, look for more media noise and legislative proposals to control/censor/ban certain video games as the midyear national elections approach in November 2006.
 

An interesting opinion piece from Computerworld last week talked about how IT workers spend their time at work.
My company's research shows that roughly two-thirds of most IT staffers' time is spent on the installation, migration, patching, security and compliance work that, while clearly necessary, contributes little or no direct business value. In some organizations, the figure is closer to 90%.
That's frightening. It's no wonder people are trying to place blame for viruses and patches. Many organization may turn to Service Oriented Architectures (SOAs) to help solve complexity and redundancy issues, but that won't be a quick or easy fix.
In the short run, SOA actually increases system complexity and requires conceptual and architectural skills that many IT departments sorely lack. Most enterprises are still experimenting, and even the leading vendors talk about a relatively slow transition, with the real momentum for SOA not building until 2007 or so.
Any organization spending 90 percent of its time patching systems and doing installations and migrations has deeper issues. And, as the article points out, reducing those issues is what's needed. Not more software thrown at the problem. --Mike Pastore
 

A Web poll of 1,000 business users shows that 35 percent blame Microsoft for the recent worm attacks that have laid many companies low. The poll came just as three major viruses took advantage of a Microsoft plug-and-play vulnerability -- even though a patch had been issued for that flaw. Zotob has been wreaking a lot of havoc, as have Rbot and Tilebot-F. Analysts at Sophos, Inc., the anti-virus and anti-spam company that ran the survey mentioned above, say they're not sure which of the three viruses disrupted the networks at The New York Times, CNN, ABC and The Financial Times... but be sure that one of them is to blame for some downtime at these lofty news outlets, as well as at countless other companies. The Sophos survey goes on to show that 20 percent blame system administrators for not getting networks patched fast enough. And 45 percent hold the virus writers responsible for the estimated 19 worms that all take advantage of the same flaw. So who is to blame? Microsoft for having the flaw in the first place, even though they issued a patch before the malware hit? IT managers for not getting their systems patched quickly enough, despite the fact that they're commonly swamped with a flood of patches to deploy? The obvious answer is that the virus writers are to blame, but I doubt that our scorn is going to dissuade them at all. The industry simply has to come up with a better mouse trap when it comes to dealing with patches. Money, businesses and jobs are at stake. -- Sharon Gaudin
 

Earlier in the week I wrote about how fears surrounding data security are pushing online consumers away from personalization. Yesterday I spoke to Andrew Dunning, director of product marketing at portal vendor Plumtree, and asked him about something I read in Plumtree's State of the Portal Market 2005 report. It seems personalization has lost its luster among enterprise users as well. There was a time when end-user personalization was a big selling point for portal vendors like Plumtree. There are several possible reasons for this. I think the way Internet users receive information from sources like Google and RSS feeds has opened their eyes to content similar to or related to the content they are looking for. Personalization did make certain information easier to find, but it also put users in a box. It also had the potential to make life difficult for those moments that inevitably pop up when someone is sick or on vacation and we need our roles to adapt. There's also the possibility that personalization was just one of those early Internet ideas that seemed like a good idea at the time. --Mike Pastore
 

The stakes -- or at least the prices -- are getting higher for buyers of video game consoles. Microsoft has announced that its new Xbox 360, tentatively due out in November, will sell for up to $399 in the U.S. market, making it the most expensive game console yet. Maybe that price tag should include legal fees for your Grand Theft Auto character.
 

I found this article from Digital Web Magazine fascinating. Think for a minute about every conference call, meeting, and e-mail thread you've been involved in about home page design. You know the ones. They usually go for days about the minutiae of where to place a certain icon or logo, or how big it should be. Not to be the bearer of bad news, but you've been wasting time. Well, OK, maybe not. But the gist of the article is that in a world increasingly full of content aggregators like search engines and RSS feeds, the home page has lost much of its importance.
Despite our long hours and good intentions, content aggregators throw this site-centric idea out the window. They allow users to bypass a large portion of the design, whose sole purpose is to get them to target content. In this way the information architecture the designer envisioned may go unused, with users never clicking on the carefully crafted navigation links, never using the location-specific breadcrumbs, and in some cases never even seeing the much-fretted-over home page.
The writer recommends that as part of their re-thinking designers follow a few steps: embrace Web standards, focus on the page level, design for different aggregator types, and move toward user-driven aggregation systems. Thanks to the daily headlines at Shore Communications for the link. If your role in your organization is at all related to content, it's a must read. --Mike Pastore
 

It's one thing for the Zotob worm to cause slowdowns and other technical problems that impact the daily course of business. It's another thing altogether when some punk's idea of a prank interferes with the ability of wired workers everywhere to goof off efficiently on company time. Curse you, Zotob!
 

Google is offering 14.8 million shares of common stock to raise funds for a number of reasons, including working capital and possible acquisitions. While the online search leaders stock dipped on the news, Google has been a huge success story on Wall Street, with shares these days trading around $280, more than triple the $85 per share IPO from last Aug. 19. So as Google approaches its one-year anniversary as a public company, whats it worth? Based on todays stock price of $279.28 (at 11:30 a.m.), Googles overall value as a company  its market capitalization -- is $77.66 billion. Lets put that market cap in perspective: Billions $366.33  Exxon Mobil $290.75 - Microsoft $129.29  IBM $113.89  Cisco Systems $87.12  Home Depot $77.66  Google $53.81  eBay $53.38 - Disney $48.45  Yahoo $28.28  Halliburton (yes, that Halliburton) Clearly Google is a playa, worth more today than Internet venerables such as eBay and Yahoo, but still well below more mature technology companies such as Microsoft, IBM and Cisco. From an analyst's perspective, I believe that if Google can develop a line of quality, reasonably priced power tools, then leverage its existing partnerships, it can make a run at Home Depot. -- Chris Nerney
 

With sky-high gas prices hurting the average Joe more than anyone else, maybe it's time to take the wraps off an idea whose time is nigh: teleworking. Today, more and more companies are saving money on office space, electricity and general overhead while boosting morale by allowing some employees to work from home. Sun, for example, has up to 25% of its workforce off-site at least part of the time, saving the company millions. Studies have shown that employees allowed to work at least one day a week from a home office are happier, more productive, require less sick leave, etc. Not everyone in a company is able to work from home, but as the economy shifts from manufacturing to information as its base, more and more employees are able to do their jobs from just about anywhere. And, on top of everything else, this could mean you don't have to lay off employees to cut your operating budget. AT&T, for example, is said to save up to $150 million per year through teleworking. So maybe it's time to release that Kung-Fu grip on your staff and at least explore the idea. Who knows, maybe you could even get yourself out of the office before 8 P.M. and lower your own stress levels at the same time & wouldn't that be a nice change?  Allen Bernard, Managing Editor, CIO Update.com.
 

I know you're all loyal EarthWeb readers and read our CIO Update site religiously, so I'll take it upon myself to point out interesting CIO content from another site. James Champy, chairman of Perot Systems Corp.'s consulting practice and the company's head of strategy, has opined on how to be a good CIO. Champy has written several books on management and corporate strategy, so his ideas carry some weight. If you've been following this blog, you know my feelings about most meetings and I was happy to see Champy agrees with me. Part of his advice for CIOs: Stop going to meetings unless they are with customers.
The most productive meetings are always with customers -- internal or external. Too many internal meetings are spent arguing about resources or the allocation of costs. The worst meetings are those that try to solve the conundrum of transfer pricing between internal organizations, like IT and manufacturing. Just remember that no company becomes great doing business with itself.
He also advocates new ways to measure production:
Too many companies measure productivity on intermediate results, such as lines of code produced per day. What does that matter if the code is never implemented or accomplishes no real improvement in how the business runs?
--Mike Pastore
 

Well, at least it's a renewable energy source...
 

If your organization is investing in content personalization for Web site visitors, it would behoove you to examine the results of the Second Annual Personalization Survey. Almost two-thirds of respondents are concerned their personal data they provide in return for personalization might not be secure. The result of this, as you might expect, is fewer online visitors are using personalization features.
Based on the fear of losing personal information, fewer consumers than last year are willing to provide personal preference and demographic information in exchange for personalized content, according to the survey. In 2005, 59% of respondents indicated a willingness to provide preference information, down six percent from 2004. Additionally, 46% of respondents are willing to provide demographic data in 2005, down 11% from 2004.
Personalization makes it easier for online visitors to find things, and should, in turn, make them happier customers. At least, that's what happens when it's done properly. One thing is clear from the survey: Not only do organizations have to make visitors aware of their policies regarding personal information, they have to make sure the information is secure. --Mike Pastore
 

In its rush to clean up the mess after Enron and Worldcom fell apart, the government turned to legislation and stricter regulation from the SEC. The most famous of these efforts would be Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), which in addition to practically spawning a software market overnight, will ensure that people remember (and probably curse) the name of Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes, who is retiring next year. While public companies must deal with SOX regulations, SEC-regulated brokers and dealers have their own rules to follow. The best known, at least I thought it was the best known, of these regulations says that brokers must maintain a secure, non-alterable, and searchable archive of all their e-mail for as long, in some cases, as long as seven years. But lo and behold, it seems that while I knew brokers have to maintain an e-mail archive, many of the brokers didn't. Or don't care. Or haven't gotten around to it yet. According to a study from Intradyn, one in three small-to-mid-sized securities firms are still not archiving e-mail to meet SEC regulations. While Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and the rest of the Wall Street old guard have had the most prominent roles in the ups and downs of the last few years, firms of less than 100 employees make up 94 percent of the NASD's membership.
Key findings indicate that 36 percent of the firms surveyed were not yet archiving e-mail. More surprising, 20 percent said they were not even aware of the requirements. However, 80 percent of the firms that were not currently archiving have plans to do so.
Then there is another group:
Even though their privacy was assured, more than half of the broker-dealers contacted refused to participate in the survey. These firms were not counted in the study results.
Is there any wonder people don't trust Wall Street? --Mike Pastore
 

New CEO Mark Hurd got a good report card for his first full quarter at the helm of HP. The company reported Tuesday that third-quarter revenue rose 10 percent, topping Wall Street forecasts. Hurd took over as CEO in late March after HPs board of directors fired his ill-fated predecessor, Carly Fiorina, who has gone on to a career as a Republican political appointee-in-waiting. HPs revenue for Q3 was $20.8 billion, compared to $18.9 billion in last years third quarter. Net income (excluding one-time items) was $1.2 billion, or 36 cents per share. Analysts had predicted an average net income of 31 cents per share. While I dont have the earnings statement line items in front of me, Im certain that eliminating Fiorinas traveling coterie of hairdressers and security professionals was worth 3 cents per share in savings alone. Plus it freed up all that money for HP to hire former Dell CIO Randy Mott, whose compensation package tops $15 million. (A move which no doubt helped cushion the blow for the 14,500 employees HP announced last month it was shedding.) Speaking of Mott, another one of his former employers  Wal-Mart, also known as the distribution arm of Chinese trinket manufacturers  showed its smallest quarterly profit gain in four years and warned that Q3 earnings would not meet street estimates. At last, a genuinely positive economic trend!
 

Those of you who enjoy rooting for a plucky upstart against a certain large, monopolistic company just received some sobering news. The latest numbers from Web monitoring firm Net Applications show that Microsofts Internet Explorer browser finally may be turning back the challenge of Mozillas Firefox open-source browser. Microsoft saw an increase in users of IE in July to 87.2 percent from 86.56 in June. Meanwhile, Firefoxs market share dipped to 8.71 percent in July from 8.07 percent the month before. These might seem like miniscule changes, but they are significant because they reverse a monthslong trend that began when Firefox was released last November and had been fueling hopeful talk that Microsofts oft-criticized browser -- which boasted 96 percent market share in June 2004 -- may have met its match. Further, they increase the chance that the Mozilla Foundations stated goal of 10 percent market share by the end of this year will prove to be a pipe dream. As I wrote in May, "just as any public company can be punished on Wall Street for missing financial targets, it's possible that a flurry of 'Firefox Misses Market Share Goal' headlines could create a deadly psychological barrier in the browser market." My gut feeling is that Firefox needs at least 20 percent market share to be a viable alternative to IE for the average Internet user. It was headed in the right direction. Now its not.
 

This story is popping up on several sites and blogs today, and I promised myself I wouldn't use the same headline everyone else is: "What's in a Name?" There is brewing battle against (you'll never believe this) Microsoft over its use of the term "web feed" in the Internet Explorer 7.0 beta. It seems Microsoft uses "web feed" in place of RSS. I'm going to assume we all know what RSS is, and I hope you're using it to read this blog and get your news. Here's a summary of the argument from Ed Bott's blog, complete with a screen shot. Some critics are undoubtedly concerned that by not using the term RSS, Microsoft can come up with its own not-quite-standard, like it did with XML for its Office products. Let's assume that's not the case for now. (Remember, IE 7.0 is in beta 1 and has a ways to go.) What the Microsoft critics are missing here is that RSS doesn't mean anything to the masses. Most computer users (i.e., not geeks) probably don't even know or care what HTML is. They just care that the technology works in the way they expect it. The estimates range from 2 to 12 percent for how many computer users make use of RSS feeds. Adoption has a long way to go. And if Microsoft gives it a simple name that everyone understands, there's no harm in that. Ed Bott comes to a similar conclusion:
The important point here is that brand names get established because people want to sell stuff, and brands help them simplify the process of explaining what the stuff they're trying to sell is for.
And, of course, Microsoft is not alone. There is a whole list of organizations that call RSS by another name.
 

"Despite all the work the PC industry has done to try to make their products easier to use, customers are still frustrated by PC technology." I pulled this line from a story on buyer satisfaction with their PC makers. It seems that Dell is slipping (I never got good service from them on two separate machines that were dead out of the box) and Apple is still No.1 (not for me, I had to pay $140 re-stocking fee four days after I bought a machine that -- again -- didn't work right out of the box. But, anyway & ). My first thought was "Of course, they are frustrated." Computers are hard products to use and even harder products to understand & the bits go in and the images come out. No moving parts to replace or oil and you can't even imagine how it's done unless you have a PhD in computer science. The technology which looks so smooth and easy in TV ads is actually quite quirky and clunky to use compared to say, a coffee maker or your TV. Nothing happens in real time at the PC level and the Internet is still a vast shopping mall that takes too long to window shop -- even with broadband. Yes, PCs have come a long way since the flashing C:/ prompt, but it's really only the early adopters who know that. Most people that use computers have only come on board since GUIs were borrowed from Xerox PARC. To really get by using a PC you have to master a whole new language and who really has time for that? You have to understand how to guard against a litany of threats you cannot see. And if you computer is infected by a worm, virus, Trojan (is that a little man with a spear?), spyware, key logger, data miner, spam, et. al., you might end up giving away your bank account info. or worse. And let's not forget about those lovely little social engineering past-times called phishing and pharming. People understand that these used to be good ways to make a living, not ways to rip you off. So, it's no wonder to me that users are frustrated; and I'm just scratching the surface here. Let's not forget the world before Microsoft made plug and play a useable, if imperfect, technology. Actually, in the end, it surprises me that anyone willingly uses computers for anything outside of work (geeks aside of course). But that's why I'm writing this blog on my Compaq when I should be sunning myself while my NASDAQ stocks work for me -- instead of the other way around. -- Allen Bernard, Managing Editor, CIO Update.com
 

I was a very, very young lad when Nancy Reagan led the war on drugs with her simple Just Say No campaign. You couldn't watch television in those days without seeing public service announcements warning about the dangers of drug abuse. Was it part jingoism? Of course. Did it solve the problem? Of course not. But it did raise awareness. An article published last week on eSecurityPlanet talked about two scourges of our daily lives that didn't even exist back when Mrs. Reagan was waging the drug war: spam and phishing scams.
Anti-phishing is the newest area of Internet security, says the [Anti-Phishing Working Group] APWG's Dave Jevans. There are a number of companies providing innovative products and services in this area, but it's still a new and evolving science. Also, internal education can be an important factor. This is especially true when educating employees about avoiding internal phishing, i.e., attacks designed to spoof IT administrators and steal access credentials to internal systems.
We have already seen software to battle phishing scams. There is SpoofStick from CoreStreet and there are components to fight phishing in the next version of Internet Explorer. And there is more software to come. But how effective is this software if people don't know about it? It's a safe assumption that the readers of eSecurityPlanet are not the victims of phishing scams. A report that is almost a year old found phishing scams cost U.S. victims $500 million. You don't have to be a security software genius to think most of the victims are elderly or poorly educated. And here's another interesting fact about phishing:
The Anti-Phishing Working Group reports that more than 3,326 phishing sites were operating as of May 2005, with more than 107 trusted brands having been hijacked to perpetrate attacks.
That's 107 banks, credit cards, online auction sites, and of course PayPal. I know my bank has a warning on its Web site about fraudulent e-mail scams. I know I've never read it. But I wrote a rather lengthy guide to identity theft that included information on how to detect a phishing scam. Where are the public service announcements on TV warning people and educating people about these scams? Yes, there are resources online, but how Internet savvy are the victims of these scams? We still have so many PSAs about drug use they have their own Web site. Where are the banking associations and the government? Five hundred million dollars bilked from Americans and we're relying on software solutions instead of spreading the word where the victims will hear it. The word needs to get out that when you're asked for personal financial information online, just say no.
 

While it might be time to stop singing in the car, it also might be time to stop assuming you're having a private conversation. Under specific conditions, people outside of your car can listen in on conversations inside your car if you have a built-in Bluetooth telephone link, according to a story in the New York Times. This low-power wireless connection between your cell phone and your car is designed to allow for hands-free conversations. However, the Times reports that it appears to be vulnerable to eavesdroppers. The vulnerability was announced at a recent European computer security conference, where some security gurus calling themselves the Trifinite Group showed how they could use a laptop to not only listen in on conversations in passing cars with the Bluetooth setups, but they also could talk to people in the other car. The Times reports that the vulnerability exists only if the Bluetooth setup does not follow industry standards. But for those of us still baffled by setting up TiVo, this seems like a high price to pay for messing up my hands-free installation. Imagine driving along on the way to work or to an offsite business meeting and have someone in a passing car listen in on a conversation you're having with your boss or someone from the financial department. Suddenly plans for a corporate acquisition or a big technology deployment are not so secretive. And egads!! Imagine that someone passing by actually could comment on the way you sound singing along to the radio!!
 

I was on vacation last week in a place where you cant get Internet or cell-phone access (yes, some still exist), but was able to cope because August usually is a slow news month and I didnt think I was missing much. Which I wasnt, unless you count the latest action in Microsofts ongoing vendetta against Google for stealing a top executive in July. It seems revenge-minded Redmond is engaging in the cyber-equivalent of dumpster diving. Legal documents filed by Microsoft in a Washington state court claim that an employment agreement between the online search leader and former top Microsoft techie Kai-Fu Lee was "recovered from the Recycle Bin of one of Dr. Lees computers." According to news reports, the court documents show Google was encouraging Lee to break a non-compete contract and fully expected legal action from Microsoft. The Recycle Bin remnants on Dr. Lees computer also reportedly said Google was willing to put him on paid leave for a year while the court fight raged on. Nice gig if you can get it. A judge has issued a restraining order preventing Lee from performing certain tasks for Google until a September court hearing. While he was at it, the judge should have revoked Dr. Lees Ph.D. for leaving such a "hot" document in the Recycle Bin. Its one thing for a 15-year-old boy to be enlightened about the browsers "History" feature by his parents in the wake of an Internet porn romp. This guy should have known better. At the very least, this legal tug-of-war makes for good entertainment in the slow summer weeks.
 

I really got to reading about Ajax programming when Information Week made it the focus of its cover story in its July 4 issue. Ajax, which is sometimes spelled out in caps, stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, and its best known these days for powering the Google Maps Web application. I've seen renewed interest in Ajax this summer, with how-to articles appearing on developer-oriented sites like DevX.com, and I've even thought of publishing something related to Ajax on our Intranet Journal site. Late last week Jim Wagner over at InternetNews.com filed a feature on Ajax technologies which, while possibly a bit late to the party, was very thorough. Jim's story points out that Ajax, despite the recent spotlight, is far from a new technology, and he also explains how browser standards, and the lack thereof, have hindered its growth. It's timely to point out relationship between Ajax and browser standards with a new version of Internet Explorer coming from Microsoft, as well as Ajax programming tools code-named Atlas. Sounds like an increasing number of Web applications will be built on either Ajax or Macromedia's Flash in the future. Ajax needs Web browsers that support it. Flash, much like Adobe's Acrobat, relies on a client-side plug-in, but it's one that 98 percent of computers have. Says one Macromedia exec in Jim's story:
The distribution dynamics of Flash versus browsers -- this lowest common denominator problem you have when you rely on features that are shared across browsers -- is a fundamental issue that is going to leave a lot of people dissatisfied with how far they can go with the AJAX technique.
 

There really are an unlimited number of interesting angles to Google in general. When most of us got started in this business, there was no Google. The search engines that did exist insisted we get headlines, weather, stock quotes, and horoscopes with our search results. Who would have thought the search engine of choice for almost everyone features nothing but search on its front page? The What's Next column in Business 2.0 this month takes a look at, well, what's next for Google. It starts by asking the question: "What if Google wanted to give Wi-Fi access to everyone in America?"
The gatekeeper of the world's information could become one of the globe's biggest Internet providers and one of its most powerful ad sellers, basically supplanting telecoms in one fell swoop.
There is a rather simple explanation why Google would get into the network business. Put simply, the company's oft-stated goal is to organize the world's information and make it accessible. And as I know from covering content management and intranet technologies, the amount of information in the world is growing at an astronomical pace. This presents a basic challenge for Google.
Every time a user performs a search on Google, the data is transmitted over a network owned by an ISP -- say, Comcast -- which links up with Google's servers via a wholesaler like AboveNet. When AboveNet bridges that gap between Google and Comcast, Google has to pay as much as $60 per megabit in IP transit fees. As Google adds bandwidth-intensive services, those costs will increase.
Once Google has a network built, the article says, it could offer services to consumers. The company already took part in a project to add Wi-Fi to San Francisco's trendy Union Square shopping district. Google has already done a very good job organizing the world's information, perhaps this is how they make it accessible.
 

Remember the famous Twinkie defense? Call this one the hacker defense. According to a news report in the Sydney Morning Herald, an Australian man got out of a speeding ticket by claiming that the technology behind the camera that caught him speeding was susceptible to hackers. The judge bought it and let him off the hook. Actually, according to the Sydney paper, the judge threw the case out because the Roads and Traffic Authority failed to find an expert to testify that its speed camera images were secure. Seems the driver's defense lawyer argued that the algorithm (known as MD5, for those of you fluent in algorithms and such) used to store the time, date, place, license plate and speed of cars caught on camera was a ''discredited piece of technology''. The lawyer told the Sydney Morning Herald that he's had more than 100 inquiries from motorists anxious to use the same defence. Of course, they're anxious to use the same defense. No one seems to have said that the technology has been hacked into. But no one has said that it can't happen either. Chalk this one up to the hacker defense!
 

A Washington Post article I found via MSNBC today issues a warning to managers about what seems to be a huge problem (maybe moreso among Washington bureaucrats than IT workers): workplace boredom.
...boredom is a condition that can be more stressful and damaging than overwork, according to those who have studied the issue. "We know that 55 percent of all U.S. employees are not engaged at work. They are basically in a holding pattern. They feel like their capabilities aren't being tapped into and utilized and therefore, they really don't have a psychological connection to the organization," said Curt W. Coffman, global practice leader at the Gallup Organization, whose large polling group measured employee engagement.
It says in the article that the busiest employees are the happiest. A survey by Sirota Consulting of more than 800,000 employees at 61 organizations worldwide found that those with "too little work" gave an overall job satisfaction rating of 49 out of 100, while those with "too much work" had a rating of 57.
"Those who are saying their workload is heavier rather than lighter are more positive," said Jeffrey M. Saltzman, chief executive of Sirota. "When you say you have too much work to do, other things are happening in your head: 'I'm valued by the organization. They're giving me responsibility.' That's better than being in the other place where you say I'm not of value in this place.
The story, which I highly recommend reading, is full of interesting little anecdotes. It points out that airport screeners have a program in place to deal with boredom: they rotate positions every 30 minutes, which isn't something we can all do. There's a charming story about a bureacrat who sneaks off to the movies during the day and runs into a colleague at the theater; and another about a contractor with a soft spot in her heart for Tolstoy:
...she brought [sic] copy of "War and Peace" to work. She finished it in two weeks.
The point is you have to keep your employees busy to keep them happy and make them feel valuable. All but unmentioned in the article is the fine line between busy and overworked to death. I personally like being busy, but your opinion may vary. A look at the related articles to the MSNBC story suggests boredom may be an issue at both work and home, despite our 300 TV channels, the Internet, gaming consoles, and satellite radio. Listed among the headlines: "Cheating wife says she's bored by husband."
 

It's safe to say that 10 minutes after the blog was invented, someone was trying to figure out how to make money off of the idea. And much like we saw when marketers struggled to grasp how the Web could be used to market and advertise, it appears blogs are headed in the same direction. I covered marketing for internet.com's CyberAtlas site (which later became ClickZ Stats) back when there were Web traffic surveys from Media Metrix and Relevant Knowledge, and when comScore came into existence. The Web traffic numbers didn't always match up, but an educated user knew the differences in methodologies and understood, I think, the numbers were the best we had with such a nascent technology. So fast forward a few years, and now people are trying to grasp blog traffic and usage, all in the name of making more money. But where blogs differ from the most popular sites on the Web is the cult of personality many of them carry. Witness what can only be described as a catfight in this ClickZ News article about a blog readership study comScore released that was co-sponsored by Six Apart and Gawker Media. (Six Apart makes the software that powers this blog.) For those interested in advertising and marketing via blogs, this is what you need to know:
"...blog publishers should benefit overall from its discovery that the blog audience is both richer and younger than the overall Internet audience."
For those interested in the sniping and screeching among those with an inflated sense of self-importance (it is a Friday in August after all) the exchanges in the article between Jason Calacanis, publisher of Weblogs Inc. Network (WIN) and Nick Denton, the Gawker Media publisher who sponsored the study and likes its results, are pretty good. Says Denton:
"I know it galls Jason Calacanis that his sites are about as memorable as Burger King franchises, and that none register among the top blogs, except Pete Rojas's Engadget."
As entertaining as the exchanges in the article were, it's important for IT managers to remember a couple of things about blogs and the underlying technolgy. 1) RSS has the potential to be a very useful technology in the enterprise for applications that don't involve blogging. Witness what KnowNow is doing in that area. 2) Corporate blogging has its own risks and benefits, and it would be wise to nail down an obective before you or your employees take it on.
 

I recently switched my long distance to MCI because they offered a flat rate. When the bill came it was at least $30 more than the "flat" rate I was quoted by the MCI rep. It was full of extras, fees, charges, and outrageous long distance charges that somehow didn't fit into their calling plan. While this in of itself is not unusual, seeing Bernie Ebbers get 25 years for fraud and one of his lieutenants get five years made me think about that old adage of things "flowing downhill." It appears that Ebbers' $11 billion bait-and-switch accounting has permeated the entire organization from top to bottom. This, in turn, made me think about how organizations really do reflect the values of their leaders. If a company is run by well-intentioned, hard-working people, chances are the rest of the organization will reflect those values. There is another company I've heard about lately that, while not doing anything technically illegal, is repackaging open-source software as their own. I think, technically, they are following the letter of the GPL, but former insiders tell me that the company's leadership is so bad (arrogant, antagonistic, autocratic) now it's only a matter of time before something (bad) happens. Ethics and managerial "style" aside, everything comes down to the basics -- the Kindergarten Code, if you will -- lying is bad (you loose friends and respect), treat others the way you would like to be treated, play fairly, be honest, and accept responsibility for you actions ... all the things you and I do to survive in our personal trenches and sleep well at night. If doing things differently than this is the cost of power or riches, I think I'm happy just where I am. What's the point of getting everything you've always wanted just to loose everything you already have? PS - MCI called back the other day to offer me their services for free. Should I believe them this time? I don't think so. I asked to take me off their calling list and they agreed & we'll see.
 

It seems to me that while much is made of SOA, utility computing, grids, hosted apps, web services, etc. that many CIOs are still stuck with siloed infrastructures that don't let them make the most of these technologies. There are a host of automation products on the market today, for example, that promise to bring some sense of sensibility to infrastructure and network maintenance, patching, provisioning, and software updating, etc. but these products can only scratch the surface since most CIOs and IT managers today still have to deal with antiquated infrastructure models that don't lend themselves to automation. It reminds me of the promises of ERP and CRM that where never fully realized. Worse, legacy mainframes still handle a vast majority of transaction-level and mission-critical processing and these systems are silos unto themselves (unless of course they are API'd to death, which I know they are, but that's hardly streamlining). So the questions I have are a) am I right? (I always reserve the right to be wrong, by the way) and b) if I am right, are things turning around? I know the last IT-year (which is like three human-years) or more has been spent on Sarbanes Oxley and other compliance driven initiatives, not (that I can tell, anyway) on re-working infrastructures, platforms, and networks to take full advantage of what vendors are offering today, although that can very well be part of that process. And before that was Y2K. And, of course, the tech/dot-com bubble burst. And then, of course, 9/11 and the subsequent economic downturn that slashed IT budgets and laid-off thousands and thousands. But, today, there seems to be a bevy of new products designed to take advantage of what appears to be a turnaround for IT. Big initiatives like BPA and BPM, SOA, utility computing, etc. have all been getting green-lighted -- at least in the pilot stages. Does this mean IT is heading for greener pastures? I think its hard to say since most budgets have expanded only moderately and any new project has to justify itself with a positive ROI. But overall, IT today seems to be better off than yesterday and some of the promised promised-land of better, faster, cheaper (and standardized) infrastructure and software may truly be around the next bend. Only time will tell of course, but "Are we there yet?" may be an answerable question sooner rather than later these days.
 

On the day President Bush signed into law a new energy bill, we suffered a power outage yesterday morning that brought things to a halt here at EarthWeb Central. It never ceases to amaze me how quickly I can go down my list of things to do and come up empty when the power is out. As part of the new energy bill, as you've probably heard, daylight savings time will start earlier in the year and last longer starting in 2007. The idea here, I'm told, is that people will use fewer lights because it will be lighter longer. Or something like that. I doubt it will have a major impact on power consumption. All of the lights and air conditioners in commerical buildings dwarf residential power consumption anyway. I don't know about where you work, but the lights are always on here in the middle of the day. One interesting wire story making the rounds this week says our electronic gadgets are going to flip out in 2007 once Daylight Savings Time isn't where we left it. But devices connected to the Internet can be patched. And devices connected to other networks, like cell phones and cable boxes, will be adjusted. In the end, we're not talking Y2K+7 here. Some electronic devices will have to be manually changed. I agree with this guy:
Moti Tzur, a sales manager at Sakal Electronics Ltd. in Jerusalem, says the constant changes do little to confound manufacturers, sales representatives or consumers. "We get up and change the time on the VCR ourselves," Tzur said. "These things come with directions."
And not with this one:
But while other countries have coped, Americans have largely become complacent and expect many clocks to change automatically because dates have been set for two decades, said Lauren Weinstein, a veteran technologist. "Missiles wont be launching but it's still going to cause a lot of hassle," he said. Risks grow when "things advance to the point where you expect things to happen automatically and you expect it to be correct."
You want a hassle? Trying having no power at work in August.
 

More jobs seems like a pretty good thing to most of us. But on Wall Street, news of rising employment invariably is greeted with the same level of enthusiasm accorded a major accounting scandal. In other words, the market tanks. So it has gone on Friday, with stocks down in the wake of better-than-expected jobs data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The BLS reported the American economy added 207,000 jobs in July, far exceeding economists predictions of 180,000. In response, the Dow Jones, the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 have spent almost the entire day (through mid-afternoon) swimming in red. Whats going on? Is Wall Street lined with misanthropic wealth and power junkies who cant bear to see the working classes enjoy even the modest benefits of a recovering economy? Of course it is! Dont be so na?ve! But there's more to it than that (well, in some cases). Growing employment and increases in average hourly earnings spark fears of rising interest rates and inflation, which investors believe will dampen spending and borrowing. Hence the instinctive curmudgeonly selloff when jobs and paychecks are on the upswing. The market usually overreacts to any kind of notable economic news, so we should see at least a partial recovery by days end. What Id really like to see some day is Wall Street enbracing a strong jobs report with unbridled good will and enthusiasm.
 

It is my personal belief that there are two kinds of people in this world: those who hate meetings, and those who call meetings. With that in mind, I present 10 Steps To Better Meetings. It's funny how many of these tips seem like common sense. But then again, if everyone were good at running meetings, the concept wouldn't be so despised. Among the common sense tips:
Cancel your meeting if you think you no longer need to have it or if everyone is not prepared. Never, I repeat, never have a meeting just for the sake of having it.
and
Start on time.
There is also a tip about effective leadership. Many years ago I was part of a group organizing an event, and we held weekly meetings. It always seemed some of the participants couldn't make the meeting from time to time. But when they did show up, they would bring up issues we thought we resolved the week earlier. The leaders were unable to say those issues were settled and move on, but instead they would put them back on the table. That was the most frustrating meeting experience of my life. And yes, I know that anecdote was vague. And yes, I did that on purpose.
 

What type of spam do you get most frequently? Viagra? Mortgage offers? Porn? Have you heard from that Nigerian nobleman recently? Network security vendor Sophos has just released a study showing the prevalence of different categories of spam. The results may surprise you. I know I was surprised. I always thought there was basic parity among the major types of spam, but during the first half of this year, unsolicited email offering deals on medications and pills (Viagra, etc.) comprised 41.4 percent of all spam. Thats nearly four times as much as the runner-up, mortgage solicitations, which logged 11.1 percent of the total spam this year through June. Porn is in third place at 9.5 percent, though Sophos says x-rated spam has been on the decline. To be fair to porn, however, you easily could make an argument that it should be put into a category with Viagra, since they're really about the same subject. The fast riser so far in 2005 is stock spams, or scams. This category comprises 8.5 percent of all junk email through June and has been growing about 10 percent a month, according to Sophos. Fifth place is product spam, at 8.3 percent. That leaves 21.2 percent for Sophos to shoehorn into an other spam category. (Note to Sophos: Drill down, you Sophosians! You cant have other make up more than one-fifth of your total. We want the Nigerian!) So lets sum up the top categories that spammers think will pry money out of consumers: Viagra (sex), mortgages (money), porn (sex) and stocks (money). Sounds about right.
 

Following up on the IE 7.0 posts from yesterday... Joe Wilcox, the Microsoft Monitor analyst over at JupiterResearch, posted his impressions of IE 7 Beta 1. Joe wants spell check included. He likes the way the tabs are designed so it's hard to accidentally close them (an issue he had with Safari). He didn't post yet on the RSS capabilities, but Jane Kim, the program manager for RSS in IE, gave an overview of what Beta 1 offers in the Longhorn RSS blog a couple of days ago for those who are interested but don't have the beta. (And while I'm on the subject of Microsoft and monitors, there's an interesting tidbit on TechDirt on how Windows Vista will require users to get new monitors. Well, maybe not require, but if you want to see DRM-protected content at high quality, a new monitor would be useful in that regard.) Joe used a Sony VAIO S460 for his Beta 1 test, which was done at 11:30 last night. For the record, I have not seen the Beta 1 yet, and at 11:30 last night I had just gone to bed after watching the Mets' bullpen blow a game to the Brewers.
 

As part of my regular gig as editor of EarthWeb's Intranet Journal Web site, I read quite a bit about knowledge management. I came across this interesting post on Jack Vinson's blog. Jack found it on the blog of Godfrey Parkin. We all know the retirement of the baby boomer generation has the United States in a tizzy over healthcare costs, retirement, and social security. But one impact that's not getting much attention is the potential for brain drain when all those boomers head off for the sunset (or Florida).
A quarter of current American employees will be retiring within the next five years. If the outgoing masses know anything of value and it is not being passed down to others in their companies, those organisations face a brain drain that could harm their ability to operate.
Parkin points to an Accenture survey that found some pretty scary results:
...one-quarter (26 percent) of respondents said that their organizations will let them retire without any transfer of knowledge. Just 20 percent said they anticipate an intensive, months-long process of knowledge transfer prior to their leaving, 28 percent said they believe the knowledge-transfer process will last one or two weeks, and 16 percent think they will simply have an informal discussion with others in the organization prior to retirement.
Common sense says this a potentially huge problem in IT departments because technology changes so quickly. It got me thinking about IBM's recent news coming from their mainframe business. In a few years, who exactly is going to know how to run a mainframe? As it turns out, EarthWebNews published a story just last month that asked the same question.
Clipper Group analyst Mike Kahn said the problems facing mainframe customers are legitimate concerns. "One of them is: 'Where am I going to get my next generation of systems programmers and analysts because the kids they are getting out of school used to do C and now they do Java, and what good is all of this going to do unless I'm running Windows and Linux?'"
There's probably an opportunity here for some of those boomers to make a little extra dough on the side once their 9 to 5 days are over. But Accenture says companies aren't taking advantage of it.
Just one-third (34 percent) of respondents reported that their companies hire retired employees as contractors so those former employees can transfer their knowledge and skills to their replacements.
Food for thought if your IT staff is getting ready to call it a career.
 

In extraterrestrial tech news, Datamation salutes Stephen K. Robinson, the shuttle Discovery astronaut who performed a daring repair job on the crafts shell during a space walk Wednesday morning. While perhaps not as challenging as hot-swapping a server, it was the first time a shuttle astronaut has tried to repair heat shields while in orbit. Robinson removed by hand two small pieces of cloth dangling from Discoverys underside. NASA scientists were worried the two pieces of cloth - called gap fillers -- could cause overheating during re-entry. Robinson, 49, is a mission specialist and has a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. He also plays lead guitar in a rock band called Max Q, according to his NASA biography. Max Q is a term for a specific point during shuttle takeoff when craft speed and air density are at a maximum. This link has a tremendously geeky explanation, featuring equations and some line-chart grid thing. Id turn back if I were you.
 

For as long as its been a software powerhouse, Microsoft has aggressively defended the quality of its products, right down to the last bit of code in its hourly line of security patches. So it caught my attention when a top Redmond programmer freely acknowledged that Internet Explorer 7.0 -- which was supposed to silence criticisms that the browser hasnt been upgraded in eons - will have some catching up to do. In Microsofts IE blog, Chris Wilson, head of development for the Web platform in IE, said IE 7.0 will not pass a test created by a grassroots organization seeking to pressure browser vendors to support World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) standards. The Web Standards Projects "Acid2" test primarily determines whether a browser supports HTML4, cascading style sheets (CSS1), portable network graphics (PNG) and Data URLs. (Sobering note: Its 2005, and three of these four were initially recommended in the past millennium. Whatever happened to Internet time?) The test consists of clicking on a link that shows you a happy face - if your browser supports W3C standards, that is. If it doesnt, your happy face looks as if its missing some DNA coding. The Web Standards Project was magnanimous about Microsofts admission. I can assure you this sort of openness is a radical departure from the Microsoft of old and as good a reason as any for optimism that this is just the beginning, and we can expect even more and better in IE 7.5, blogged Web Standards Project member Chris Kaminski. Maybe. But this isnt exactly Steve Ballmer bellowing out the news at a press conference.
 

I know what you're thinking: "Where's the punchline?" But the Internet Explorer team has released some information on the security for IE 7.0, which entered Beta 1 recently. This information all comes from Microsoft's Rob Franco and you can read it from the IE team's blog. I'll sum it up here and make a few comments. --Internet Explorer for Vista will feature a "Protected Mode" (formerly known as Low-rights IE) to help prevent malware from installing on a user's system through a vulnerability. --Beta 1 features a "No Add Ons" mode to disable features like ActiveX. In Beta 2, it will become a "Manage Add Ons" mode so users have more power. --There will be a "phishing filter" to steer users away from sites that are known to be used for phishing scams, and even to warn you when a site that wasn't already reported looks "phishy" (like it uses the tricks phishing sites use). Of course, this is all in the beta and how it works will decide whether Microsoft uses it in the final release or not, and in what incarnation. You have to recognize that Microsoft will always be a target, and that nefarious acts like phishing will always be out there, with their tactics changing to beat things like phishing filters. I use Internet Explorer (and FireFox, actually) so this was of interest to me. And while many IT managers may not be IE users, end users in your organization likely are, and they most certainly are at home. It's an uphill battle Microsoft faces regardless of what you think of the company, its security efforts, and its browser. The phishing scams especially drive me crazy, and if the filter knocks a few of them out of business, then I'll be grateful. As an Internet security expert once told me for a story I was doing "They must be making money because they keep doing it." So anything that stems the flood of e-mail about my closed bank accounts at banks I've never heard of -- yeah, I'm all for trying it.
 

Search Datamation Blog